Tuesday, February 28, 2023

In the era of Great Power competition, state of the art technologies are needed - Breaking Defense

In the era of Great Power competition, state of the art technologies are needed - Breaking Defense

2301_IDEX_SeaG-ASW_SocialMedia_1600x900_P06825

For the maritime domain, GA-ASI’s MQ-9B SeaGuardian® uses advanced sonobuoy technology to track submarines.

World defense leaders are gathering in Australia for the 2023 Avalon International Airshow against the backdrop of some of the toughest security challenges in the world.

Continued attempts by China to coerce Australia, the deep chill between China and the United States, the ongoing war in Ukraine and more – these are difficult problems, and they’re not going away anytime soon.

Responsible powers need the newest and best tools in order to assure their own security, their international commitments and to preserve the allies’ goal for peace and security in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond. The good news is that the state of the art in advanced aircraft and other systems give military, intelligence and other government leaders newer and better options than they’ve ever had.

There are many good examples, among the systems manufactured by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., the world leader in remotely piloted, multi-mission aircraft. San Diego-based GA-ASI invented and pioneered the use of unmanned aircraft with its iconic Predator, giving it the knowledge and experience to be better poised than anyone else for the expansive new era of what’s possible with unmanned systems.

The state of the art

This includes aircraft such as the MQ-9B SkyGuardian, a direct descendant of that earlier Predator – but better in every way. The MQ-9B is larger, can fly for longer, carry bigger payloads and do more in every respect. It can support missions over land, coastal areas or open ocean. It can support mission across multiple domains including land and maritime, all within the same flight if necessary.

A number of advanced militaries are using or plan to make use of the MQ-9B, including the UK Royal Air Force, Belgium, Taiwan and Japan, with more programs expected. Users prize its ability to fly for around 30 hours, collect high-quality, multi-sensor intelligence and exploit a number of other tools or sensors, from communications relays to anti-submarine warfare systems.

Although potent on its own, the SkyGuardian and its sibling SeaGuardian also make powerful complements to other tactical units. They’re a fraction of the cost to operate of a big, human-crewed maritime patrol aircraft, and yet they generate nearly all of the same intelligence and have many similar capabilities. And when SeaGuardian works together with those aircraft, it vastly expands what can be accomplish together as a team.

Integrating SeaGuardian into air and other operations revolutionizes anti-submarine warfare, for example. And the aircraft also enables any number of other important functions at sea – spotting distant targets, for example, which could then be engaged by a surface warship using long-range weapons to avoid risk. The Australian Defence Force is making big commitments to improve its long-range strike capabilities and SeaGuardian is the ideal sensing and targeting asset to connect long-range fires platforms to their objectives.

MQ-9B doesn’t only have high-quality sensors that enable joint commanders to see precisely what they wish. Its long endurance also means that it can surveil and report on targets for longer than anything else available today — with no intermittence of the kind often associated with other overhead assets.

Machine learning and high degrees of automation make SeaGuardian the most capable intelligence system of its kind. A proprietary Detect and Avoid System, invented by GA-ASI, makes national airspace authorities able to certify MQ-9B to operate alongside traditional aircraft with no special accommodation: no special corridors, human-piloted chase aircraft or other arrangements. MQ-9B can operate just like any other aircraft; its pilots communicate with air traffic controllers, just as would a crewed aircraft.

2210_GA-ASI_Gray_Eagle_and_Eaglet_Media_Photo_1920x1080px_200dpi_P07710

GA-ASI’s Gray Eagle Extended Range delivers a new degree of power, interoperability, and combat capability.

Enter the Gray Eagle

SeaGuardian and SkyGuardian aren’t the only advanced aircraft being manufactured today by GA-ASI. The slightly smaller, but similarly capable, Gray Eagle 25M also represents the cutting edge in its category, focused on the needs of major landpower services such as the U.S. Army or others.

The newest Gray Eagle offers more onboard power to support the latest high-tech sensing and computing, along with a modular, open-architecture design that permits quick and easy integration of new equipment. To put it another way, the new Gray Eagle 25M is like a mobile phone that can get new features with new software. If a user needs it to do something different, it’s only a question of downloading the right app.

These new qualities, combined with the legacy features of the aircraft, also make it ideal as an augmentation to other units. Gray Eagle already was one of the best examples of “manned-unmanned teaming,” in which, for example, the human crew aboard an AH-64 Apache helicopter can use the Gray Eagle as needed for battlefield surveillance, targeting and threat avoidance. Tough lessons from Ukraine highlight the importance of situational awareness to battlefield helicopter survivability.

But the Gray Eagle 25M also is showing the way forward on new types of “manned-unmanned teaming.” The aircraft is an optimal platform for new, small unmanned systems called air-launched effects. These too are open architecture, giving customers the option to select various models for various missions. Among GA-ASI’s systems is the Eaglet, which recently recorded a milestone flight test with the U.S. Army.

Gray Eagle and its larger sibling, the MQ-9B, are available today to permit responsible nations to focus both on contemporary and future needs, including on the important multi-domain operations that blur the old lines between the green and blue services. But because they’re mature, long-proven systems, they’re highly cost competitive when compared with many other aircraft – or as compared with attempting to design a new system from a clean sheet.

GA-ASI_Gambit-BlueNotebook_8.5x11_03_v2

GA-ASI’s Collaborative Combat Aircraft, Gambit Series, enable warfighters with disruptive tactics, machine learning, and adaptability at scale.

More advanced systems in the works

Advanced new future capabilities also are in the works from GA-ASI. One of the most exciting responds to a U.S. Air Force desire to augment its human-piloted fighters with “collaborative combat aircraft.” In the future, the Air Force wants pilots to have numbers of highly autonomous wingmen that can scout ahead of them, provide multiple looks at contacts, watch for long periods of time and, if necessary, release ordnance of their own.

That’s why GA-ASI is building a system called Gambit. This family of four aircraft are about 70 percent common across core systems – reducing their costs and greatly simplifying construction – but each one has its own unique mission: air domain sensing; armed escort; low-observable reconnaissance; and high-quality aggressor training. The Air Force Research Lab recently issued GA-ASI a contract to build and test the first of these.

Still other new systems, ranging from new small aircraft to a very large one – an optionally manned surface-effect transport called Liberty Lifter – also are coming from General Atomics Aeronautical Systems. So even though the international security challenges for Australia and its allies won’t get easier to solve, the tools with which to address them will continue to improve.

 

Friday, February 24, 2023

A400 Series Air Security Radars for Drone, UAV & UAS Detection - Blighter

A400 Series Air Security Radars for Drone, UAV & UAS Detection - Blighter

blighter.com


Blighter’s A400 series range of air security radars build on the heritage of its successful Blighter B400 series ground surveillance radars. A400 series radars are modular non-rotating, electronic-scanning (e-scan) systems using power efficient PESA (passive electronically scanned array) and FMCW (frequency modulated continuous wave) technologies to provide reliable, small and slow drone (UAV, UAS, RPV) detection even in complex environments.

A400 series air security radars are optimised for the detection of small drones carrying video cameras, wireless communication systems, narcotics, explosives and other malicious payloads. A400 series radars use D3 (Digital Drone Detection) technology that enables them to extract the tiny radar reflections from modern plastic bodied UAVs even when flying close to the ground or near buildings where clutter reflections are relatively large. Blighter’s Ku-band operating frequency is ideally suited to detecting the small structures used to construct compact UAVs such as the control wires, battery pack, motor and wireless communications system.

A400 Series Air Security Radar Configuration Options

The A400 series radars are offered in three configurations. The Blighter A402 radar covers a horizontal azimuth scan sector of 90°, the Blighter A422 radar covers 180° and for 360° surveillance a dual-A422 back-to-back configuration can be used. Vertical elevation coverage is selected by use of either the W20S antennas (20° standard or 30° extended coverage) or the M10S antennas (10° standard or 15° extended coverage). An optional Blighter Radar Tiliting System (BRTS Mk 2) allows the A400 radar to provide increased volumetric air coverage combined with drone altitude indication.

Detection Performance

A400 series radars are capable of detecting DJI Phantom drones at ranges from 10 m to more than 3 km and larger drones and aircraft at ranges up to 20 km. Drone speeds ranging from hover-drift to over 400 km/h are all detected. Target tracking software and extensive zone filtering facilities allow drones to be detected while reducing false alarms from birds.

Architectural Overview

  • Radar type: E-scan Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Doppler Radar
  • Radar mode: tri-mode (air, ground and coastline)
  • Frequency band: Ku band
  • Spectrum occupancy: 15.7 to 17.2 GHz
  • Scan type: fully electronic scanning in azimuth (‘e-scan’) using a Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA)
  • Transmitter power (nominal): 4 Watt
  • Multi-radar operation: supported and unlimited
  • Embedded software and firmware: field upgradeable via network connection

Target Detection Performance

  • Maximum detection ranges:
    – RCS 0.01 m²: 2.73 km (1.7 mi.)*

    – RCS 0.05 m²: 4.09 km (2.54 mi.)*
    – RCS 0.1 m²: 4.87 km (3.03 mi.)*
    – RCS 0.5 m²: 7.28 km (4.52 mi.)*
    – RCS 1.0 m²: 8.66 km (5.38 mi.)*
    – RCS 10.0 m²: 15.40 km (9.57 mi.)*
  • Maximum targets per scan: 700
  • False Alarm Rate (FAR): 1 false alarm per day (adjustable)
  • Minimum detectable target radial velocity: 0.37 km/h (0.23 mph)

*Free space detection performance. A400 series radar with M10S antennas. UAV detection ranges are highly dependent upon construction of the airframe and of the onboard electronics and payload.

Coverage

  • Instrumented maximum range: 20 km (12.4 mi.)
  • Instrumented minimum range: less than 10 m (33 ft.)
  • Azimuth scan angle: 90° (A402), 180° (A422) or 360° (Dual A422) horizontal e-scan
  • Elevation beam (vertical beamwidth):
    10 to 15° (M10S Antennas) or
    20 to 30° (W20S Antennas)
  • Fastest scan time (for 90°): 1.0 s
  • Fastest scan time (in Drone Spotlighting Mode): 0.25 s

Connectivity & Software

  • Main I/O interface (for radar control and target data): 10/100 Ethernet network interface
  • Auxiliary I/O interfaces: RS-232 and RS-422 control lines, opto-isolated control/status inputs and isolated switched contact outputs
  • Software (SDK): API software library (Windows) and generic Interface Control Document (ICD) are both available to System Integrators

Electrical

  • Battery/regulated-PSU input range: from 12 V to 28 V (DC)
  • Vehicle supply input range: from 12 V to 24 V (DC)
  • Power consumption (from 12 V regulated-PSU): 100 W (nominal)

Physical, Environmental & Reliability

  • External dimensions of radar unit(s) (W x H x D)*: 666 mm x 503 mm x 128 mm (26.2 in. x 19.8 in. x 5.0 in.)
  • Weight of main radar unit (approx.)*: 25 kg (55 lb.)
  • Weight of auxiliary radar unit(s) (approx.)*: 21 kg (46 lb.)
  • Operating temperature: from -32° C to +60° C (from -25° F to +140° F)

Note: extended operating temperature version available

  • IP rating: IP66 (dust tight and protected against powerful water jets)
  • MTBF: > 65,000 h

* excluding antennas, mountings and solar shield

Errors and omissions excepted. Blighter Surveillance Systems Ltd reserves the right to modify specifications without notice. Blighter radars are protected by a number of international patents. The Blighter name is an international registered trademark.

BSS-1310 ©2020 Blighter Surveillance Systems Ltd

Blighter A400 Series Air Security Radars Deployed on Mast Blighter A422 Air Security Radar Mounted on Mast

 

Thursday, February 16, 2023

Emerging Unmanned Underwater Vehicle(UUV) threat – International Defense Security & Technology

Emerging Unmanned Underwater Vehicle(UUV) threat – International Defense Security & Technology

idstch.com

Emerging Unmanned Underwater Vehicle(UUV) threat - International Defense Security & Technology

Rajesh Uppal

Drones have become an essential platform for any military and they have changed the shape of recent conflicts. Their slow speed and small radar cross-section have created a lot of challenges for conventional sensors and weapons to detect and engage them. Many technologies have been developed for their detection and neutralization vast range of platforms, from small, homemade devices to large, sophisticated uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) platforms.

New actors are quickly emerging including autonomous uncrewed underwater vehicles (UUVs), which bring an entirely new challenge to your subsea defence operations. Unmanned underwater vehicles (UUV) are any vehicles that are able to operate underwater without a human occupant. Smaller and cheaper autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV) are today very capable and gaining users. Large autonomous underwater vehicles are more expensive but they offer capabilities in some missions and applications that no other platforms can offer.

Within the last decade, interest in UUV to be part of specific military, industrial and academic missions and applications have increased due to technological innovation and the evolution of their sensor payload. Missions such as persistent surveillance, anti-submarine warfare, oceanography and mine coutermeasure are amongst those where UUV capabilities far exceed those offered by other platforms.

Uncrewed platforms in the underwater domain present an entirely new set of challenges for friendly forces. UUVs are ideal for information gathering. They may collect intelligence information through ISR missions including intelligence collection of all types (imagery, acoustic, water profiling), target detection and localization, and mapping (e.g. Intelligence Preparation of the Battlespace (IPB) and Oceanography). UUVs are uniquely suited for information collection due to their ability to operate at long standoff distances, operate in shallow water areas, operate autonomously, and provide a level of clandestine capability not available with other systems.

In an operational context, a UUV is launched from a platform of opportunity, submarine, surface ship, or even an aircraft or shore facility and then proceeds to the designated observation area. It then performs its mission, collecting information over a predetermined period of time. It autonomously repositions itself as necessary, both to collect additional information and to avoid threats. The information collected is either transmitted back to a relay station on demand or when self cued (i.e., when the vehicle records a threat change and determines that transmission is necessary)

The environment is almost the perfect blend of protection measures for potential foes where they benefit from cover from subsea terrain and noise, as well as naturally occurring fauna, animals and debris. In busy ports and harbours, vessels and crews are under substantial danger, with traditional detection systems like cameras and radars offering very little visibility underwater if at all. This makes the reliable detection of underwater intruders of any form a notoriously tricky problem, but in the case of subsea drones that are small and extremely quiet, it can seem almost impossible.

Confined spaces in ports and harbours are notoriously difficult, noisy acoustic environments. The vessels themselves are sources of noise as they come and go. In addition, shallow waters create a complex thermal structure affecting the sound velocity profile that in turn limits the performance of your acoustic systems.

Fortunately, acoustic sonar systems can be deployed to stand up to them. Only by making the right design choices, it is possible to detect hostiles using sonar. Once a target is detected, it must also be classified and distinguished from marine fauna, otherwise potential foes could be missed, or crews sent to investigate harmless objects in dangerous environments. Telling apart a harbour seal from a terrorist diver or UUV is a determination that must be made correctly, or the consequences could be dire.

Just as UAVs went from ISR to offensive roles, UUVs will also take an offensive role in underwater conflicts. UUV technologies have been evolving from defensive to more offensive roles. UUVs increasingly play a critical role in antisubmarine warfare (ASW) and perform missions such as placing and monitoring sensors on the sea floor to track enemy submarines. They can gather intelligence on opponents, detect and neutralise mines, hunt submarines and chart the ocean floor. They could, potentially, detonate warheads. And they could take part in a coordinated attack on an enemy submarine in conjunction with ‘friendly’ submarines and surface vessels.

Swarms of autonomous underwater drones could be deployed to hunt ballistic-missile submarines, targeting a cornerstone of nuclear deterrence. Groups of networked unmanned vehicles swim around independently,  carrying out high-level processing and sharing information between other members of the submerged fleet, ultimately carrying out detection and classification of enemy assets including submarines and passing the information to a command and control centre, or carrying out their own prosecution, is threatening.

Several reports indicate that Russia has been working on a ‘killer underwater drone’ since 2015. The ‘Cephalopod’ is designed for the underwater battlefield. Undersea warfare expert H.I. Sutton says that it can target shipping but its torpedoes are intended to destroy submarines.

A RAND Corporation report, Emerging trends in China’s development of unmanned systems, said Beijing had been funding 15 different universities for research programs for UUVs. Reports indicate that China is also developing low-cost unmanned UUVs for a variety of military applications, including ‘suicide’ attacks on enemy vessels.

Experts have pointed to future role in laying mines on the battlefield. To lay a minefield a UUV would have to be much larger, large enough to carry a useful number of mines. U.S. is the first sea power to start building extra-large unmanned underwater vehicles (XLUUVs). But other navies are also entering the arena, including Britain and Japan. And China, Russia, and South Korea also have large UUV projects.

The U.S. Navy’s Boeing Orca underwater drone could play an offensive role in future conflicts. The Orca design will be even larger and therefore could patrol further and could carry more. The Orca is up to 85 feet long, an order of magnitude larger than anything else out there as the moment. It has a flexible payload section which is large enough to carry multiple torpedo sized payloads.

Emerging technologies like unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) add to the complexity of the battle space and disrupt the status quo. Emerging capabilities suggest that the sea-based leg of the triad of missile submarines, land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles and crewed bombers will increasingly become vulnerable.

References and Resources also include:

https://www.naval-technology.com/comment/countering-tomorrows-uuv-threats-concept-to-reality/

https://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc199/p800838_A1b.pdf

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/could-unmanned-underwater-vehicles-undermine-nuclear-deterrence/

 

Cite This Article

 

International Defense Security & Technology (February 16, 2023) Emerging Unmanned Underwater Vehicle(UUV) threat. Retrieved from https://idstch.com/military/unmanned/emerging-unmanned-underwater-vehicleuuv-threat/.

"Emerging Unmanned Underwater Vehicle(UUV) threat." International Defense Security & Technology - February 16, 2023, https://idstch.com/military/unmanned/emerging-unmanned-underwater-vehicleuuv-threat/

International Defense Security & Technology February 16, 2023 Emerging Unmanned Underwater Vehicle(UUV) threat., viewed February 16, 2023,<https://idstch.com/military/unmanned/emerging-unmanned-underwater-vehicleuuv-threat/>

International Defense Security & Technology - Emerging Unmanned Underwater Vehicle(UUV) threat. [Internet]. [Accessed February 16, 2023]. Available from: https://idstch.com/military/unmanned/emerging-unmanned-underwater-vehicleuuv-threat/

"Emerging Unmanned Underwater Vehicle(UUV) threat." International Defense Security & Technology - Accessed February 16, 2023. https://idstch.com/military/unmanned/emerging-unmanned-underwater-vehicleuuv-threat/

"Emerging Unmanned Underwater Vehicle(UUV) threat." International Defense Security & Technology [Online]. Available: https://idstch.com/military/unmanned/emerging-unmanned-underwater-vehicleuuv-threat/. [Accessed: February 16, 2023]

 

Tuesday, February 14, 2023

Musk’s Starlink satellites accelerating development of drone warfare

 


c4isrnet.com

Musk’s Starlink satellites accelerating development of drone warfare

Elisabeth Gosselin-Malo

MILAN – The widespread use of Starlink, the constellation of internet satellites operated by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, by Ukrainian troops in defending against Russia’s invasion is accelerating development of drone warfare, according to experts interviewed by C4ISRNET.

Since receiving Starlink access terminals last year, the Ukrainian military has not shied away from making use of them. Officers from the Aerorozvidka aerial reconnaissance unit stated in past interviews that their drone pilots rely on Starlink to carry out missions, connecting the UAV team with the artillery one to generate target acquisition on Russian equipment and positions.

More recently, Ukraine officials disclosed that the country’s military was looking to establish strike forces that would be provided with Starlink equipment to create fleets of interoperable drones.



Military Use Maybe or Maybe not

Musk made somewhat contradictory remarks during his appearance on a Russian state TV show last month, saying that his company banned Starlink from being used in long-range drone strikes by Ukrainian forces. Whether these restrictions are enforced or not, one thing is clear: since being unveiled in 2015, the prospects of Starlink have long expanded beyond the original intention of providing undersupplied regions with high-speed access to the internet.

“I do not think that SpaceX ever ruled out potential military use, but it was not a case they emphasized,” said David T. Burbach, professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island, in an interview. “Today, [there is] no question that Starlink’s prominence in the Ukraine war has militaries all over the world considering and looking to make greater use of it as well as similar mobile data constellations.”

Burbach said his views are his own do not necessarily reflect that of the U.S. Navy.

Unique Low Latency

Starlink offers considerable advantages over other satellite communications networks, likely contributing to its attractiveness for equipping everything from infantry squads to armored vehicles to being integrated directly in drones as that becomes more feasible, he said.

Currently, Starlink antennas are too large and too heavy for small drones. However, there has been momentum from the defense industry to experiment. In November, Canadian company RDARS, announced that it had successfully integrated Starlink equipment to its Eagle Nest ground station, which was able to transmit data to the firm’s Eagle Eye military drone in-flight.

Via Starlink, the ground station communicates with a control center, allowing the operator to control and receive imagery from the drone. While RDARS solely integrated the dish to the drone’s ground station, the company has emphasized the potential of installing it on the drone itself.

Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command in the Middle East, has stated that Starlink was used to connect unmanned aircraft, vessels and underwater vehicles operated by allied forces in a NATO exercise in Portugal. In December 2021, Australia-based Unleash Live teamed up with Starlink to facilitate remote drone flights. Through access to Starlink’s low-orbiting satellites, the company was said to have successfully managed the system’s flight from 200 kilometers (124 miles) away.

Among the primary factors that set apart Starlink constellations from older satellite systems is its ability to operate in low-Earth orbit, at less than 2,000 kilometers above the earth, in contrast to competitors who orbit at altitudes up to 36,000 kilometers. Burbach explained that this allows the signal from Starlink satellites to be much stronger, offering higher transmission speed and requiring less power to operate.

resistant to jamming.

“The ground antennas of Starlink form a highly directional beam at the satellite it is using– the signal is then difficult to interfere except along the line between terminal and satellite,” he said.

Another benefit it has over geostationary systems is that its very large number of satellites are interchangeable, where if one is put out of service another one is able to take over. With respect to drones, Burbach states that if high bandwidth commercial satellite links can be installed inside of one or more while functioning in flight, then this would make it possible for the operating country to control it far outside of its borders.

For any country or military to rely on Starlink does entail a number of security risks as well. Perhaps the most important one being that it is possible to geolocate the terminals, possibly giving away the physical positions of forces.

Davide Scaramuzza, associate professor of robotics and perception at the University of Zurich, said that as a base station or flying drone emits radio signals, it can be intercepted by enemy forces using high power antennas across a wide array of commonly used bands.

Achieving this might be harder in practice than is let on for several reasons. On the one hand, as Todd E. Humphreys, professor of aerospace engineering at the University of Texas points out that beams a Starlink terminal produces “are narrow (less than 5 degrees and they hop around in frequency, which make it hard to get an actual lock on a terminal.”

This can in part be seen in Russia’s large inability to locate satellites one year into the war, at least on a significant scale.

Limit Useage Area, Can be shut off anytime.

On the other hand, Humphreys says that SpaceX applies geofences on user terminals to prevent their operation outside approved areas. The company also holds the power of revoking one’s access to the network if it finds this one being used in violation of the user agreement or permitted instances. One implication of this, is the possibility for a country depending on Starlink to lose access to these services in the middle of a war if the commercial operator decided so. For a military force, this would imply that it could no longer rely on or use these connections for weapons attacking the affected areas.

Burbach of the Naval War College said a more subtle risk is that the system operator, SpaceX, has an extensive access to information about clients, and by extension Ukraine.

‘If I were the Russians, I would be very interested in trying to get into Starlink by compromising an employee or even getting an agent on staff,” he said. “We know several foreign intelligence services have done so with other social media firms.”

Global expansion

SpaceX has undergone an important expansion recently, opening a representative office in Azerbaijan in late 2022, and announcing it had applied to establish a Starlink branch in South Korea. In addition, a new satellite constellation should be up later this year to provide coverage in the Middle East. While its services are currently active in 45 countries, mostly NATO members or allies of the U.S.

Experts say that it is not a far remote possibility that the company could begin supplying customers in countries unfriendly to the West, who could also be interested in using Starlink for military applications.

While, as the University of Zurich’s Scaramuzza argues, it is false to assume that Starlink can be associated with a country, there are still important concerns to be raised regarding the development of its integration on unmanned platforms and overall uses. In January, footage from a pro-Russian paramilitary group on a telegram channel claimed that they had captured and disassembled a Ukrainian drone, finding a Starlink dish modified to fit onto the system. While these reports remain unconfirmed, such events could likely happen on a more frequent basis, as the demand for the internet services continues to rise and further integration with drone systems persists.

“Generally, it is very hard to operate a drone that you obtained from another country, especially when the security protocols such as encryption are designed well. Just like if your laptop got stolen and you had not saved all your passwords for online-banking on the device itself, your account would still be secure,” he said.

Despite this, it remains very easy to dismantle an enemy aircraft to learn more about the technologies used inside it and extract information. This has been seen extensively in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, where each side has attempted to destroy enemy capabilities and improve its own.

The proliferation of Starlink, less regulated than Starshield, for military purposes remains in its very early days.

Samuel Bendett, research analyst at the Center for Naval Analyses’ Russian Studies Program concludes, “whatever happens in Ukraine is going to serve as a blueprint for future Starlink applications in drone warfare.”

A legitimate military target?

Last September, a Russian delegation to a UN working group on space security, insinuated that under international humanitarian law, Starlink could be designated as a legitimate military target. In a similar fashion, it has been reported that China is working on developing counter-systems to Starlink and that in the event of a conflict with the US, the satellites would be treated as an active target.

Heiko Borchert and Torben Schutz at the Defense Artificial Intelligence Observatory in Hamburg said that this is one of many complexities and sets of questions that will have to be answered as Starlink is further militarized.

“If it is to be considered a proper military target, the question then becomes how would Western governments respond in the event of an attack on a single satellite or constellation,” they said in a post.

Such matters are also challenging considering that SpaceX has not only received significant subsidies from the U.S. government, but that the U.S. Agency for International Development reportedly also paid the company to send over 1,000 Starlink terminals to Ukraine.

Borchert says that this is an important space to watch, concerning whether Washington would be willing to provide the same level of support to make Starlink available in the event of other conflicts to friendly governments.

Elisabeth Gosselin-Malo is a Europe correspondent for Defense News. She covers a wide range of topics related to military procurement and international security, and specializes in reporting on the aviation sector. She is based in Milan, Italy.

Researchers Discover a More Flexible Approach to Machine Learning | Quanta Magazine

 

 

Researchers Discover a More Flexible Approach to Machine Learning | Quanta Magazine

By Steve NadisFebruary 7, 2023

While the algorithms at the heart of traditional networks are set during training, when these systems are fed reams of data to calibrate the best values for their weights, liquid neural nets are more adaptable. “They’re able to change their underlying equations based on the input they observe,” specifically changing how quickly neurons respond, said Daniela Rus, the director of MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.

One early test to showcase this ability involved attempting to steer an autonomous car. A conventional neural network could only analyze visual data from the car’s camera at fixed intervals. The liquid network — consisting of 19 neurons and 253 synapses (making it minuscule by the standards of machine learning) — could be much more responsive. “Our model can sample more frequently, for instance when the road is twisty,” said Rus, a co-author of this and several other papers on liquid networks.

The model successfully kept the car on track, but it had one flaw, Lechner said: “It was really slow.” The problem stemmed from the nonlinear equations representing the synapses and neurons — equations that usually cannot be solved without repeated calculations on a computer, which goes through multiple iterations before eventually converging on a solution. This job is typically delegated to dedicated software packages called solvers, which would need to be applied separately to every synapse and neuron.

In a paper last year, the team revealed a new liquid neural network that got around that bottleneck. This network relied on the same type of equations, but the key advance was a discovery by Hasani that these equations didn’t need to be solved through arduous computer calculations. Instead, the network could function using an almost exact, or “closed-form,” solution that could, in principle, be worked out with pencil and paper. Typically, these nonlinear equations do not have closed-form solutions, but Hasani hit upon an approximate solution that was good enough to use.

“Having a closed-form solution means you have an equation for which you can plug in the values for its parameters and do the basic math, and you get an answer,” Rus said. “You get an answer in a single shot,” rather than letting a computer grind away until deciding it’s close enough. That cuts computational time and energy, speeding up the process considerably.

“Their method is beating the competition by several orders of magnitude without sacrificing accuracy,” said Sayan Mitra, a computer scientist at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

As well as being speedier, Hasani said, their newest networks are also unusually stable, meaning the system can handle enormous inputs without going haywire. “The main contribution here is that stability and other nice properties are baked into these systems by their sheer structure,” said Sriram Sankaranarayanan, a computer scientist at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Liquid networks seem to operate in what he called “the sweet spot: They are complex enough to allow interesting things to happen, but not so complex as to lead to chaotic behavior.”

At the moment, the MIT group is testing their latest network on an autonomous aerial drone. Though the drone was trained to navigate in a forest, they’ve moved it to the urban environment of Cambridge to see how it handles novel conditions. Lechner called the preliminary results encouraging.

Beyond refining the current model, the team is also working to improve their network’s architecture. The next step, Lechner said, “is to figure out how many, or how few, neurons we actually need to perform a given task.” The group also wants to devise an optimal way of connecting neurons. Currently, every neuron links to every other neuron, but that’s not how it works in C. elegans, where synaptic connections are more selective. Through further studies of the roundworm’s wiring system, they hope to determine which neurons in their system should be coupled together.

Apart from applications like autonomous driving and flight, liquid networks seem well suited to the analysis of electric power grids, financial transactions, weather and other phenomena that fluctuate over time. In addition, Hasani said, the latest version of liquid networks can be used “to perform brain activity simulations at a scale not realizable before.”

Mitra is particularly intrigued by this possibility. “In a way, it’s kind of poetic, showing that this research may be coming full circle,” he said. “Neural networks are developing to the point that the very ideas we’ve drawn from nature may soon help us understand nature better.”

Sunday, February 5, 2023

DARPA’s NOMARS developing long endurance Autonomous warship for surveillance, targeting, electronic warfare and strike warfare – International Defense Security & Technology

DARPA’s NOMARS developing long endurance Autonomous warship for surveillance, targeting, electronic warfare and strike warfare – International Defense Security & Technology

 

DARPA’s NOMARS developing long endurance Autonomous warship for surveillance, targeting, electronic warfare and strike warfare

IDST – International Defence, Security and Technology

by Rajesh Uppal1h

DARPA NOMARS Defiant


In 2018, China surpassed the U.S. Navy as the world’s largest naval force.  China has now launched a new “world-leading unmanned warship” that is supposedly ready for combat, Chinese media reports. The JARI multi-purpose unmanned combat vessel, a new product of the state-owned China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation, is 50 feet in length and displaces 20 tons. Chinese media reports that this ship is capable of conducting the same missions as China’s Type 052 destroyers, namely air-defense, anti-ship and anti-submarine missions.

Chinese military observers refer to China’s latest development as a “mini Aegis-class destroyer” because of its radars, vertically-launched missiles and torpedoes, the Global Times reports, referencing the US Navy Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, many of which are equipped with powerful Aegis radars, surface-to-air missiles, and anti-submarine warfare capabilities. The JARI can, the Global Times reports, be controlled remotely or operate autonomously, although more testing is required before it can fully do the latter. Chinese military analysts have talked about this vessel being used with other drone ships to create a swarm.

The US is pushing for the development of unmanned vessels as part of its goal to expand the US Navy and allow for more distributed operations in wide areas like the Pacific. The US military has experimented with small crewless swarm boats, as well as medium-sized unmanned surface vessels like the Sea Hunter. Navy is aggressively seeks unmanned vehicle technology and pursues multiple USV programs as it experiments with a new fleet architecture. Defense Secretary Mark Esper recently called for the Navy to build toward a fleet of more than 500 ships that would include a mix of both manned and unmanned vessels.

That has led the U.S. Navy to aggressively push toward an LUSV equipped with a vertical launching system, or VLS, to get the punch of a missile-shooting frigate for less money. “We can’t continue to wrap $2 billion ships around 96 missile tubes in the numbers we need to fight in a distributed way against a potential adversary that is producing capability and platforms at a very high rate of speed,” the U.S. Navy’s top officer, Adm. Michael Gilday, said in recent comments. Senior Navy officials have talked about the LUSV as a kind of external missile magazine that can autonomously navigate to and integrate with the force, then shoot its missiles and return for reload, keeping the big manned surface combatants in the fight and fielded longer.

The U.S. Navy is enthusiastically pursuing a new architecture for its surface and subsurface fleets that gradually reduces dependence on expensive manned platforms for many traditional functions like surveillance, targeting, electronic warfare and strike warfare. But one of the issues with that architecture is the problem of maintaining them without a crew aboard.

In recent years DARPA has spent considerable efforts on the development of unmanned surface vessels (USVs) with the agency previously developing the 40m-long Sea Hunter platform and the Improved Navy Lighterage System (INLS). INLS, known as “Sea Train”, is designed to use a mix of powered and unpowered USVs to transport equipment and supplies.

Sea Hunter was the first large (greater than 100-ton displacement) USV. Just as DARPA has had many UAV [unmanned aerial vehicle] programs that occurred after ‘Amber’ (which wasn’t the first UAV to fly), similarly the department may choose to have multiple USV [unmanned surface vessels] programs to tackle hard development problems.  “The ACTUV program (Sea Hunter was the name of the ship, not the program) explored the development of the first USV. That doesn’t mean all the hard problems are solved.

The US Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)  has now launched  No Manning Required, Ship (NOMARS) programme with a broad agency announcement (BAA). Under NOMARS, DARPA is seeking a vessel that could operate completely unmanned at sea for extended periods of time. DARPA said in the BAA it wants to ‘explore the NOMARS design space from Conceptual Design Review (CoDR) through Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and system definition.’

“As for the `Is Sea Hunter for weapons and NOMARS for logistics?’ question:  No – they are both platforms that can carry payload.  Ultimately what payload the US Navy would have future generations of USVs carry is part of their decision space, but there is nothing unique to the NOMARS philosophy that makes it more compatible with warfighting payloads vs. logistics payloads.”

The agency is looking for  potential vessel which would challenge the ‘traditional naval architecture paradigm’ by creating a ship that eliminates all the design considerations associated with housing a crew. DARPA has set aside $41m for the development of the programme and design of the NOMARS platform, which should be able to operate for up to a year at sea before requiring maintenance. The agency at this time does not plan to build an operational vessel, but rather an ‘X-ship’ demonstrator that can be used as a proof of concept for the NOMARS.

NOMARS program

The No Manning Required Ship(NOMARS) program seeks to design a ship that can operate autonomously for long durations at sea, enabling a clean-sheet ship design process that eliminates design considerations associated with crew. NOMARS focuses on exploring novel approaches to the design of the seaframe (the ship without mission systems) while accommodating representative payload size, weight, and power.

By removing the human element from all ship design considerations, the program intends to demonstrate significant advantages, to include size, cost, at-sea reliability, survivability to sea-state, and survivability to adversary actions such as stealth considerations and resistance to tampering. The program also will strive for greater hydrodynamic efficiency via hull optimization without requirements for crew safety or comfort.

NOMARS is focused solely on the design of a novel sea frame rather than a vessel complete with mission systems, but DARPA added the notional payload space is 23ft by 12ft by 9ft. Avicola described the program as an experiment in putting aside some of the traditional elements of designing ships because NOMARS won’t be developed around the needs of people aboard.

“NOMARS is not a barge; it is a MUSV [medium-sized unmanned surface vessel].  DARPA is attempting to develop a next-generation MUSV class that has significantly higher reliability and availability, and carry significant payload for its size.   Leveraging any existing design would defeat the purpose of the DARPA program.” “NOMARS is a demonstrator of a next-generation USV.  It is not focused on any specific mission, and has enough design flexibility that acquisition designs could conduct a number of different operations.”

One of the problems that have plagued the early tests in unmanned vessels is the lack of crew aboard to diagnose issues and undertake basic maintenance. For example, during the recent record-setting Atlantic crossing by the Mayflower MAS 400 autonomous ship, when sensors detected a problem the teams managing the vessel were forced to divert first to the Azores and then to Canada.

Recognizing these issues, DARPA says that NOMARS is pushing the boundaries on ship reliability. Because there is no crew on board to perform maintenance, NOMARS required new approaches for power generation, propulsion, machinery line-up, and control schemes to ensure continuous functionality throughout a long mission in all weather, temperature, and sea states.

Specifically, NOMARS is addressing the ‘next-gen’ problem of designing and demonstrating a USV that is optimized for three design considerations simultaneously: 1) Optimizing unmanned ship design for maximum performance when all human survivability constraints are removed from the platform (there will be no people on NOMARS at any time when away from the pier); 2) Maximizing the reliability of the design, with the goal that the ship can operate for a year between maintenance cycles; and 3) maximizing the maintainability of the design – e.g. when the ship goes into port for a maintenance cycle, how do we design the ship to make that turn-around as cost efficient and scalable as possible, enabling a future with large numbers of such ships?  Building a design that is good at all of these things simultaneously is a hard problem that is beyond the scope of any existing ship design and certainly is different from all the unmanned ships that currently exist.

To get after that aspect, the NOMARS program is going to split into two tracks.

“Track A (Integrated Seaframe Design and Maintenance) will create a framework to evaluate potential design trades against performance requirements, both in terms of the design of the human-less seaframe, as well as the maintenance architectures that would be needed to operate the seaframe,” the solicitation read.

“Track B (Enabling Sub-system Technologies) will allow for agile development of relevant subsystem technologies, with a focus on self-adaptive health management for systems relevant to and of similar complexity as that associated with the hull, mechanical, and electrical systems of a seaframe.”

Nomars Awards

DARPA has awarded seven contracts for work on Phase 1 of the NOMARS program, which seeks to simultaneously explore two competing objectives related to unmanned surface vessels (USV) ship design: (1) the maximization of seaframe performance when human constraints are removed; and (2) achieving sufficient vessel maintenance and logistics functionality for long endurance operations with no human crew onboard. NOMARS aims to disrupt conventional naval architecture designs through creative trade space explorations that optimize useable onboard room considering a variety of constraints. This should pave the way for more capable, affordable small warships that can be procured and maintained in large numbers.

Track A is starting from scratch to pursue a new ship design and track B focuses more on individual technologies that could be employed on NOMARS or manned ships, Avicola said.

Autonomous Surface Vehicles, LLC, Gibbs & Cox Inc., and Serco Inc. received Phase 1 Track A awards, and will work toward developing novel NOMARS demonstrator conceptual designs. These awards will focus on maximizing vessel performance gain across new design criteria, with potential considerations to include: unusual hull forms, low freeboard, minimizing air-filled volumes, innovative materials, repurposing or eliminating “human space” exploring distributed system designs, and developing architectures optimized for depot-maintenance.

The DLBA division of Gibbs & Cox was selected by DARPA to explore the trade space for clean-sheet vessel designs developed without any provision for crew on board. The intent of the effort is to create a paradigm shift in the design of marine surface vehicles as the industry transitions from manned to unmanned platforms, while leveraging newly established and developmental technologies to increase capability, increase reliability, and reduce total ownership cost.

DLBA have assembled a team of subject matter experts and industry leaders to explore the many research areas of this program, some of which are: hull, mechanical and electrical systems; self-adaptive health monitoring and predictive analytics; power generation, distribution, and energy storage; as well as advanced depot-based maintenance concepts. The company will assess the interdependencies of the technical domains and evaluate each domain against overarching variables of cost, endurance, reliability, and manufacturability to ensure that the vessel design is optimized in all aspects of performance, production, and maintainability.

Barnstorm Research Corporation and TDI Technologies, Inc. received Phase 1 Track B awards, and will develop robust approaches to ship health-monitoring via novel Self-Adaptive Health Management (SAHM) architectures, which will be pivotal to achieving NOMARS at-sea endurance and reliability objectives. InMar Technologies and Siemens Corporation also received Phase 1 Track B awards; the former will develop new techniques for morphing hull structures to maximize performance, while the latter will implement toolsets previously developed through the DARPA TRADES program to design optimized material structures for novel NOMARS ship concepts.

NOMARS is expected to uncover future benefits through improved understanding and design of unmanned surface warships. In Phase 1, performers will conduct large trade space exploration studies which will provide insights and tools for future USV ship development programs. Following this, Phases 2 and 3 of the program will build prototype hardware demonstrating some of these concepts, culminating in an “X-ship” seaframe that can be used for demonstration, testing, and future ship design experiments.

The companies exploring potential designs do not need to account for passageways for people to move through, maintenance areas crew members could access, and the potential for seasickness, he noted. “All of those aspects go into ship designs. And so there are well-known naval architecture rules of thumb and design principles that naval architects use to design ships,” Avicola said. “We’re basically saying, start from a clean sheet of paper and examine all of those design choices, with this other question in mind — how do you make the ship reliable without any human movements and how do you design the ship so it’s maximally efficient if you don’t have to worry about all that stuff I just told you about.”

NOMARS isn’t only focused on the ship. The goal for NOMARS is two-fold. In addition to seeking a ship design created without considerations for humans onboard, DARPA is also exploring how it can maintain an unmanned ship that performs lengthy transits and does not need humans to perform the sustainment work while on the vessel.

Understanding how unmanned ships can be optimally designed for cost-effective, scalable maintenance is a critical piece of the design trades being explored. At the conclusion of this program, it is envisioned that NOMARS will have significantly improved our knowledge and understanding of how to build large numbers of affordable and reliable unmanned warships. This, along with insights about ways flotillas of such ships can be effectively maintained and operated, will enable new capabilities for the U.S. Navy.

Avicola described the track B awards, which went to five different companies, as having a “narrower” focus than the pursuit of a wholly new ship design in track A. “If a performer — let’s say had a novel engine technology for the sake of argument — that they thought might make a difference, they could have proposed that to a Track B proposal, which is not the entire trade space.” Avicola said, providing a hypothetical example.

“But we could fund that research with the idea that it would either affect ships in general, and therefore be useful to the Navy, or specifically, could enable the NOMARS future ship designs by exploring that technology and bringing it to a level where one of the Track A performers could incorporate that into their design, if they thought there was merit to do so,” he continued. “That’s really the difference between track A and track B.”

“Barnstorm Research Corporation and TDI Technologies, Inc. received Phase 1 Track B awards, and will develop robust approaches to ship health-monitoring via novel Self-Adaptive Health Management (SAHM) architectures, which will be pivotal to achieving NOMARS at-sea endurance and reliability objectives,” DARPA said in the release. “InMar Technologies and Siemens Corporation also received Phase 1 Track B awards; the former will develop new techniques for morphing hull structures to maximize performance, while the latter will implement toolsets previously developed through the DARPA TRADES program to design optimized material structures for novel NOMARS ship concepts.”

In describing the portion of NOMARS devoted to the maintenance of unmanned vessels, Avicola compared the ships to aviation platforms. While unmanned and manned aircraft typically require a similar maintenance structure – where a ground crew provides sustainment in between sorties – Avicola said unmanned ships “break the paradigm” because while manned vessels are maintained by the crew aboard, the NOMARS concept removes the crew from the equation.

“So now we take a ship that goes out to sea for some period of time –say months — comes back to port, and now a ground crew swarms over it, so it’s more like the airplane model, right? So how do you design the ship, so that it can be accessible to that maintenance paradigm where you maintain it from the outside in between sorties? Our sorties are months, not hours or days, but it’s still the same idea,” Avicola said. “And let’s say you had 50 ships that you want to maintain at any given period of time, how do you make it so that it’s almost like an assembly line process, so that it’s amicable to scaling?”

“So you bring the ship into a depot – you know this is completely notional, right — this is something that the performers are going to go explore. But imagine — as an idea — that you bring the ship to the pier, you lift the ship out of water because they’re not very big ships,” he continued. “You’ve seen boat hoists lift fishing boats out of the water — same kind of thing – maybe I lift it out of the water, put it on a pad, and then somehow I take it apart, do whatever I need to do, put it back together, put it back in the water.”

Should companies succeed in the trade study work, Avicola said the program would ideally lead to a second and third phase in which DARPA would seek proposals and ultimately a prototype of a vessel that meets the design requirements the companies explored in the first phase. “If we can fundamentally redesign how unmanned ships are designed compared to — if we can unlearn all the lessons we’ve learned for manned ships that are no longer applicable for unmanned ships, we very well might have enabled that vision of larger fleets of cost-effective unmanned ships that the Navy keeps describing, and I think that’s a very exciting goal,” Avicola said.

Serco completes US DARPA NOMARS Phase 1A concept design

Technology and management services provider Serco has completed Phase 1A concept design work for a US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) programme, reported in Sep 2021.  In addition, DARPA down selected Serco’s Voyager team for the programme’s Phase 1B preliminary design work.

Serco Lead Reliability Engineer Ryan Maatta said: “We really wanted to push the limits with this design, and DARPA has structured this contract in a way that allows us the freedom to consider a wide range of traditional and emergent technologies, it really is an exciting time to be in the field, it’s the kind of work that if you are lucky comes around a few times in a career and really makes it all worth it, we have a great group of engineers and sharp industry partners.”

Serco used their DSX tool to create a set of ship designs ranging from 170-270 metric tons, then refined those into a single ship for the preliminary design review, which the company named Defiant.

In Phase 2 of the program, Serco will finalize ship design, build the ship, and work through a series of rigorous testing activities before taking it to sea for a three-month demonstration event.

Transition to Navy

“Ultimately DARPA is building a NOMARS demonstrator – we don’t do ‘production runs.’ The goal for NOMARS is to demonstrate a next-generation USV [unmanned surface vessel] capability that could be transitioned for a large production run if that’s what’s decided after demonstration of the concept.”

Gregory Avicola, the NOMARS program manager, told USNI News in a recent interview that DARPA has had conversations with Navy offices like PMS-406, the service’s program executive office for unmanned and small combatants, and the Surface Development Squadron, which has been tasked with developing the concept of operations for unmanned surface vehicles, since the agency started the NOMARS initiative.

“If we do have a really successful program, how do we transition it? The answer is — so far — what we’ve been doing is have closely linked coordination with the Navy offices that care about this sort of stuff. So PMS-406, in particular, we’ve been bringing along for all of our technical discussions. And when we get to phase two, we expect to partner up with them in terms of making sure that the [request for proposals] we put out has things that are crucial in there . . . if we’re going to go do demonstrations with them, things like that,” Avicola said.

“We’ve been talking to SURFDEVRON, which would be — that’s the Surface Development Squadron — which would be in charge of testing and experimentation with the ship once DARPA’s done with it, presumably,” he continued. “So making sure that they’re part of the process… from the very beginning so that they know what we’re doing, and they have the ability to give us their thoughts and help guide the program, to a certain extent.”

PMS-406 is overseeing Navy programs like the Large Unmanned Surface Vehicle and MUSV, while SURFDEVRON One currently has a Sea Hunter prototype that originated as a DARPA program. SURFDEVRON One is slated to receive a second Sea Hunter this fiscal year, as it continues experimentation.

Thrustmaster to Supply Propulsion

Thrustmaster of Texas, Inc. announce it is providing a customized thruster propulsion system to SERCO, Inc. in support of its recently awarded No Manning Required Ship (NOMARS) contract from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

The advanced platform design has been developed by SERCO to meet the performance requirements established by DARPA to demonstrate true unmanned operations for extended time periods.

Joe Bekker, president of Thrustmaster of Texas, said, “The thruster system developed for the NOMARS platform uses a combination of proven and highly reliable thruster component technologies with an innovative hydrodynamic design that allows for the thruster to support not only critical propulsion requirements but also to meet additional maneuvering and endurance requirements.”

Bekker said Thrustmaster will support thruster design and production as well as the initial NOMARS system level testing at its 300,000-square-foot facility in Houston.

References and Resources also include:

https://news.usni.org/2020/10/27/darpa-testing-the-limits-of-unmanned-ships-in-new-nomars-program

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2022/07/darpa-updates-on-its-sea-train-and-nomars-usvs/

 

  Create note

LikeBroadcast

 

 

Breakthrough in Satellite Error Correction Improves Space Communications

Typical LEO Architecture and Segments Spectra of some LEO Link Losses Breakthrough in Satellite Error Correction Improves Space Communicatio...