Securing the Digital Seabed

A Naval Strategy for Undersea Cable Protection

The Quad-Plus framework offers a maritime solution to China's gray zone warfare against critical communications infrastructure

By Claude Anthropic

The next conflict won't start with missiles flying—it'll be anchors dragging. This stark warning from defense analysts reflects a new reality in great power competition: the weaponization of merchant vessels against the undersea cables that carry 99 percent of global internet traffic and facilitate $10 trillion in daily financial transactions.

China's systematic campaign against undersea communications infrastructure represents a fundamental shift in gray zone warfare, one that demands an equally innovative naval response. The solution lies not in traditional fleet operations, but in a new model of maritime cooperation that leverages coast guard assets, advanced surveillance technologies, and allied integration to protect the digital lifelines of the modern world.

The Threat Below

Subsea cables have become the Achilles' heel of the digital age. These fiber-optic lifelines stretch across ocean floors, making them ideal targets for sabotage with minimal resources while providing plausible deniability for malicious actors. Recent incidents demonstrate the vulnerability: in early 2025, Chinese vessels severed cables connecting Taiwan to the outside world, while similar operations in the Baltic Sea targeted European communications networks.

The pattern is unmistakable. Chinese fishing vessels cut two cables serving Taiwan's Matsu Islands in February 2023, isolating 14,000 residents for six weeks. In January 2025, the Chinese-owned Shunxin39 switched off its identification signal while passing over a cable near Taiwan, severed it, and reappeared under a different flag—a textbook case of maritime deception.

Taiwan, connected by just 24 subsea cables, faces existential risk. In a crisis, China could covertly sever these links, leaving 23 million people digitally isolated before firing a single shot. This capability transforms undersea sabotage from an irritant into a strategic weapon capable of paralyzing an island nation's economy, military coordination, and emergency response capabilities.

Naval Lessons from the Baltic

NATO's response in the Baltic Sea provides a blueprint for Indo-Pacific operations. The alliance's "Baltic Sentry" mission, launched in January 2025, deploys frigates, maritime patrol aircraft, and naval drones in a coordinated surveillance network. At least 11 Baltic cables have suffered damage since October 2023, prompting this unprecedented mobilization of naval assets for infrastructure protection.

The Baltic Sentry model demonstrates the effectiveness of layered maritime surveillance. Naval radar and sonar systems, aerial reconnaissance from military and commercial drones, and integration of Automatic Identification System data with commercial satellite imagery create comprehensive maritime domain awareness. AI-powered tracking systems at NATO's new Maritime Centre for the Security of Critical Undersea Infrastructure enable reaction times "within a half an hour or an hour"—dramatically faster than the 17 hours one suspected sabotage vessel dragged its anchor in 2024.

Most significantly, the operation demonstrates how mine countermeasures vessels excel in this mission. German Navy Commander Marcus Fiene, commanding the coastal mine-hunting vessel FGS Datteln, emphasizes that MCMVs' underwater sensor capabilities make them ideal for cable monitoring. "We are the CCTVs of the seas," notes Commander Arjen Kockx of Standing NATO Mine Counter Measures Group 1. "Nothing will remain unseen in this area."

The Quad at Sea

The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue has moved beyond diplomatic forums to operational reality with the July 2025 launch of the first "Quad-at-Sea Ship Observer Mission." Officers from the Indian Coast Guard, Japan Coast Guard, U.S. Coast Guard, and Australian Border Force embarked aboard the USCGC Stratton, creating unprecedented multilateral cooperation in undersea cable protection.

This initiative reflects a fundamental insight: coast guard vessels are better suited for cable protection than traditional naval assets. Coast guards operate under different legal authorities, enabling boarding and inspection of suspect vessels in international waters where naval forces might face restrictions. Their law enforcement mission provides legitimacy for the constabulary operations essential to deterring cable sabotage.

The Australian-led Cable Connectivity and Resilience Centre exemplifies this approach, working with governments and industry across the Indo-Pacific to support effective cable development and management. Australia's "gold standard" in cable protection—robust legal, regulatory, and policy measures—demonstrates how maritime nations can adapt their frameworks to address emerging threats.

Expanding the Maritime Network

The logical evolution of Quad cooperation is a "Quad-Plus" framework incorporating South Korea and the Philippines through the Indo-Pacific Partnership for Maritime Domain Awareness. This expansion would create a comprehensive surveillance network leveraging each nation's unique capabilities:

• South Korea brings advanced shipbuilding capacity and technology integration
• The Philippines provides strategic geographic positioning across key sea lanes
• Japan contributes world-class maritime patrol aircraft and submarine detection capabilities
• Australia offers vast ocean monitoring experience and underwater warfare expertise
• India provides extensive Indian Ocean surveillance networks
• The United States supplies satellite intelligence and global coordination capabilities

Public-private partnerships enhance this framework. The Maritime Security Consortium demonstrates how allied-made technology can expand surveillance capabilities cost-effectively. Integration with commercial satellite operators and shipping companies creates a network that spans military, civilian, and commercial domains.

Fleet Requirements and Industrial Base

Protecting undersea cables requires dedicated maritime assets. Current global repair capacity is woefully inadequate: cable repairs average 40 days worldwide, with Southeast Asian repairs taking twice as long as North Atlantic operations. Of 62 major cable ships operating globally, only 19 focus on maintenance, and merely two are U.S.-flagged and operated.

The SHIPS for America Act addresses this capability gap through Section 403, establishing a Cable Security Fleet modeled on the Maritime Security Program. Two SubCom cable ships will join this fleet, receiving annual stipends in exchange for availability during crises. However, broader industrial base development is essential.

Japan's shipbuilding industry offers immediate solutions. Pooling Quad resources to establish an allied-controlled cable repair fleet would reduce dependence on Chinese-operated vessels while building indigenous capacity. The initiative requires full funding of the Cable Security Fleet and Jones Act reform to enable allied shipbuilders to expand U.S. subsea capacity.

Technology Integration and Satellite Backup

Advanced surveillance technologies transform cable protection from reactive to proactive. Autonomous underwater vehicles equipped with fiber-optic sensors can monitor cable integrity in real-time. Surface vessel tracking correlates suspicious behavior with cable disruptions, building legal cases for prosecution.

Satellite constellations provide partial redundancy, but cannot replace cables entirely. Taiwan plans 700 satellite receiver stations to maintain basic connectivity if cables fail, while developing constellations with Eutelsat OneWeb and Amazon's Kuiper. However, capacity limitations remain severe: Google's Grace Hopper cable transmits 350 terabits per second—300 times faster than Starlink's 1 terabit maximum.

SpaceX's near-monopoly on satellite launch infrastructure raises additional concerns given Elon Musk's business ties to China. Protecting subsea cables must remain the primary line of effort, with satellites serving as emergency backup rather than replacement infrastructure.

Legal Framework and Maritime Law

International maritime law must evolve to address deliberate cable sabotage. The 1884 Submarine Cable Convention provides historical precedent, but requires updating for modern threats. Article 113 of UNCLOS mandates domestic legislation criminalizing cable damage, yet enforcement remains problematic in international waters.

The October 2024 Joint Statement on Undersea Cable Security, endorsed by 17 nations, establishes principles for cable protection but lacks enforcement mechanisms. The United States should ratify UNCLOS and propose new provisions extending cable protections beyond 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zones.

Quad partners must develop multilateral maritime protocols outlining fast, proportional responses to cable interference. These protocols should enable immediate vessel impoundment, crew detention, and sanctions against upstream owners when sabotage is suspected. Regular exercises simulating cable attacks will prepare forces for rapid response.

Operational Recommendations

Naval forces must adapt their missions to address undersea infrastructure protection:

Enhanced Maritime Domain Awareness: Deploy persistent surveillance assets in cable-dense areas, focusing on chokepoints where cables make landfall. Coordinate with commercial shipping to identify anomalous vessel behavior.

Coast Guard Integration: Expand cross-training between naval and coast guard forces. Coast guard vessels' law enforcement authorities make them ideal for cable protection missions, while naval assets provide defensive capabilities.

International Cooperation: Establish permanent liaison officers at partner nation maritime operations centers. Real-time information sharing enables rapid response to developing threats.

Technology Investment: Develop underwater sensor networks that detect cable tampering in real-time. Integrate these systems with surface surveillance to create comprehensive domain awareness.

Legal Preparation: Pre-position legal frameworks enabling rapid prosecution of cable saboteurs. Coordinate with international partners to ensure consistent responses across jurisdictions.

Strategic Implications

Undersea cable protection represents more than infrastructure defense—it's about maintaining the rules-based international order that underpins maritime commerce. China's cable sabotage operations test whether democracies will defend the systems that enable their prosperity and security.

The Quad-Plus framework offers a measured response that avoids escalation while demonstrating collective resolve. By emphasizing coast guard cooperation over naval confrontation, the initiative maintains its defensive character while building capabilities to deter future attacks.

Success requires viewing cable protection as a core naval mission, not an ancillary task. The sea services must integrate undersea infrastructure defense into their operational planning, training, and procurement decisions. The alternative is ceding control of the digital domain to adversaries who understand its strategic value.

Conclusion

The battle for the digital seabed has begun. China's systematic campaign against undersea cables represents a new form of warfare that targets the nervous system of the global economy. The United States and its allies possess the maritime capabilities to defend these critical systems, but only if they act decisively.

The Quad-Plus framework provides the foundation for an effective response. By combining allied maritime assets, advanced surveillance technologies, and international legal frameworks, democratic nations can protect the undersea cables that enable modern civilization. The question is not whether they have the capability to succeed, but whether they have the will to act before it's too late.

The next conflict may indeed begin with anchors dragging. Our response must ensure it ends with those anchors—and the vessels that deploy them—permanently deterred from threatening the digital lifelines that connect our world.

---

SIDEBAR: The Legal Challenges of Cable Protection in International Waters

Navigating the complexities of maritime law enforcement beyond territorial seas

The enforcement of cable protection laws in international waters presents unprecedented legal and operational challenges that could reshape maritime jurisprudence and naval operations for decades to come.

Jurisdictional Complexity

Under current international law, flag state jurisdiction governs vessels operating beyond the 12-nautical-mile territorial limit. This creates a fundamental enforcement gap: while UNCLOS Article 113 requires states to criminalize cable damage, prosecution depends on the flag state's willingness to act. When Chinese-flagged vessels damage Taiwanese cables, Taiwan cannot exercise jurisdiction over the perpetrators.

The legal framework becomes even more complex when vessels operate under flags of convenience. The Hong Tai, suspected of cutting Taiwan's cables in February 2025, flew a Togolese flag but was crewed by Chinese nationals and owned by a Hong Kong company directed by a Chinese citizen. This multilayered ownership structure deliberately obscures legal accountability.

Universal Jurisdiction Expansion

Establishing universal jurisdiction for cable sabotage—similar to piracy, terrorism, and crimes against humanity—would revolutionize maritime law enforcement. Under this framework, any nation could prosecute cable saboteurs regardless of flag state, vessel ownership, or location of the crime.

However, this expansion carries significant implications:

Precedent Setting: Universal jurisdiction for infrastructure attacks could extend to cyberattacks, satellite interference, or other hybrid warfare activities, fundamentally altering the legal landscape of international conflict.

Enforcement Authority: Universal jurisdiction requires matching enforcement capabilities. Naval forces would need explicit authority to board, search, and detain foreign-flagged vessels suspected of cable crimes—a dramatic expansion of high seas law enforcement powers.

Diplomatic Consequences: Broad interpretation of universal jurisdiction could trigger retaliatory actions by authoritarian states, potentially criminalizing democratic nations' intelligence activities or military operations.

Evidence Standards and Attribution

Maritime courts require evidence meeting criminal standards, but cable sabotage often relies on circumstantial proof. Establishing legal causation between vessel movements and cable damage requires:

Technical Forensics: Underwater surveys, cable integrity analyses, and engineering assessments to prove deliberate versus accidental damage. This evidence collection can take weeks or months.

Digital Evidence: AIS tracking data, satellite imagery, and vessel communications logs. However, sophisticated actors can manipulate these systems, creating evidentiary challenges.

Chain of Custody: Preserving evidence integrity across multiple jurisdictions and time zones, particularly when initial response comes from coast guard or commercial vessels rather than law enforcement.

Coast Guard vs. Naval Authorities

The legal framework significantly affects operational planning. Coast guard vessels operate under law enforcement authorities that enable boarding and inspection of foreign vessels under specific circumstances:

Hot Pursuit: If a vessel commits a cable crime in territorial waters, pursuing forces can continue enforcement action into international waters.

Flag State Consent: Diplomatic agreements can authorize allied coast guards to board vessels flying partner nation flags.

Port State Control: Vessels entering allied ports after suspected cable crimes can be detained and searched regardless of flag state.

Naval vessels face greater restrictions under international law. Military boarding of foreign-flagged vessels in international waters typically requires:

• UN Security Council authorization
• Self-defense justification
• Explicit treaty provisions
• Flag state consent

Enforcement Mechanisms and Sanctions

Beyond criminal prosecution, new legal frameworks could establish administrative penalties that bypass traditional judicial processes:

Port Access Restrictions: Vessels and companies linked to cable sabotage could face automatic bans from allied ports, creating significant economic consequences.

Insurance and Financial Sanctions: Maritime insurance companies could be required to deny coverage for vessels with cable sabotage records, making commercial operations financially impossible.

Corporate Liability: Extending criminal responsibility to beneficial owners and operators, not just immediate flag states, would pierce the corporate veils that enable plausible deniability.

International Court Jurisdiction

Expanding International Court of Justice jurisdiction to cover cable sabotage could provide diplomatic resolution mechanisms while establishing binding legal precedents. However, major powers including the United States, China, and Russia have limited ICJ acceptance, reducing the court's practical authority.

The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea offers an alternative venue, but its jurisdiction currently focuses on traditional maritime disputes rather than infrastructure attacks.

Implications for Naval Operations

These legal developments would fundamentally alter naval mission sets:

Expanded Law Enforcement: Naval forces might receive coast guard-style authorities for cable protection, blurring traditional distinctions between military and law enforcement operations.

Evidence Collection: Naval vessels would require enhanced digital forensics capabilities, legal officers, and evidence preservation systems—capabilities traditionally associated with law enforcement rather than military operations.

Interagency Coordination: Successful prosecutions would require unprecedented coordination between naval commands, justice departments, and international legal bodies.

Deterrence vs. Escalation: The line between legitimate law enforcement and military confrontation could blur, potentially escalating routine cable protection into international incidents.

Unintended Consequences

Aggressive cable protection enforcement could trigger unintended escalation:

Reciprocal Actions: Authoritarian states might criminalize allied cable repair operations, intelligence collection, or submarine activities near their infrastructure.

Lawfare Expansion: The precedent of universal jurisdiction for infrastructure attacks could be weaponized against democratic nations' legitimate intelligence and military activities.

Commercial Impact: Overly broad enforcement could disrupt legitimate maritime commerce, particularly in contested waters where commercial and military activities overlap.

Recommendations for Naval Leadership

The sea services must prepare for this evolving legal landscape:

1. Legal Training: Officers need enhanced education in maritime law, particularly regarding cable protection authorities and evidence preservation.
2. Operational Procedures: Develop standardized protocols for cable-related boardings, searches, and evidence collection that meet international legal standards.
3. Technology Investment: Invest in digital forensics capabilities and secure evidence storage systems for extended deployments.
4. Interagency Partnerships: Strengthen relationships with coast guard, justice department, and international legal experts to ensure seamless law enforcement coordination.
5. Diplomatic Engagement: Work with allies to develop common legal frameworks that maximize enforcement effectiveness while minimizing escalation risks.

The legal framework for cable protection will shape maritime operations for generations. Naval leaders must engage actively in its development to ensure the resulting authorities support mission success while maintaining international stability.

---

---

Sources

1. Claffey, Ryan. "How the US should push the Quad-Plus to protect undersea cables." Breaking Defense, September 4, 2025. https://breakingdefense.com/2025/09/how-the-us-should-push-the-quad-plus-to-protect-undersea-cables/
2. Cannon, Brendon J. "Undersea cable security in the Indo-Pacific: Enhancing the Quad's collaborative approach." Marine Policy, Volume 171, January 2025. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24004159
3. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. "The Quad." https://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/regional-architecture/quad
4. Singh, Lisa. "The Quad needs to talk security for subsea cables." Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/quad-needs-talk-security-subsea-cables
5. Hemrajani, Asha. "The Quad Partnership for Cable Connectivity and Resilience." RSIS Commentary, 2023. https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/the-quad-partnership-for-cable-connectivity-and-resilience/
6. U.S. Department of State. "Joint Statement on the Security and Resilience of Undersea Cables in a Globally Digitalized World," October 2, 2024. https://2021-2025.state.gov/joint-statement-on-the-security-and-resilience-of-undersea-cables-in-a-globally-digitalized-world/
7. Cannon, Brendon J. "Quad needs to protect vulnerable undersea cables." Asia Times, February 16, 2024. https://asiatimes.com/2024/02/quad-needs-to-protect-vulnerable-undersea-cables/
8. RAND Corporation. "Undersea Cables Are Vulnerable to Sabotage—but This Takes Skill and Specialist Equipment," July 8, 2025. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2025/07/undersea-cables-are-vulnerable-to-sabotage-but.html
9. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. "Cable Connectivity and Resilience Centre." https://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/regional-architecture/quad/cable-connectivity-and-resilience-centre
10. Radio New Zealand. "The new threat to the undersea cables keeping our internet going," March 24, 2025. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/545872/the-new-threat-to-the-undersea-cables-keeping-our-internet-going
11. CNN. "Taiwan detains Chinese-crewed ship suspected of cutting undersea cable," February 26, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/25/asia/taiwan-detains-ship-undersea-cable-intl-hnk/index.html
12. Voice of America. "Chinese vessel suspected of damaging undersea cable near Taiwan," January 7, 2025. https://www.voanews.com/a/chinese-vessel-suspected-of-damaging-undersea-cable-near-taiwan/7926977.html
13. CNN. "Analysis: A cut undersea internet cable is making Taiwan worried about 'gray zone' tactics from Beijing," January 10, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/09/china/undersea-cable-taiwan-intl-hnk/index.html
14. Taipei Times. "Chinese vessel cut subsea cable near Taiwan: report," January 7, 2025. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2025/01/07/2003829790
15. The War Zone. "Taiwan Coast Guard Blames Chinese-Owned Ship For Cutting Undersea Communications Cable," January 6, 2025. https://www.twz.com/news-features/taiwan-coast-guard-blames-chinese-owned-ship-for-cutting-undersea-communications-cable
16. Global Taiwan Institute. "China's Undersea Cable Sabotage and Taiwan's Digital Vulnerabilities," June 4, 2025. https://globaltaiwan.org/2025/06/taiwans-digital-vulnerabilities/
17. Global Taiwan Institute. "Countering China's Subsea Cable Sabotage," March 25, 2025. https://globaltaiwan.org/2025/03/countering-chinas-subsea-cable-sabotage/
18. Yahoo News. "Chinese ship 'severs undersea cables around Taiwan'," January 5, 2025. https://www.yahoo.com/news/chinese-ship-severs-undersea-cables-202527317.html
19. Al Jazeera. "As undersea cables break off Europe and Taiwan, proving sabotage is tough," March 12, 2025. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/3/10/as-undersea-cables-break-down-proving-sabotage-a-difficult-task
20. Foreign Policy. "Chinese Ships May Have Severed Taiwan's Island Internet Cables, Again," January 23, 2025. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/01/23/taiwan-china-cables-internet-matsu-islands/
21. NATO. "NATO launches 'Baltic Sentry' to increase critical infrastructure security," January 14, 2025. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_232122.htm
22. Defense News. "11 Baltic cables damaged in 15 months, pushing NATO to boost security," January 28, 2025. https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2025/01/28/11-baltic-cables-damaged-in-15-months-pushing-nato-to-boost-security/
23. The Washington Post. "NATO announces Baltic Sentry operation to protect cables from sabotage," January 14, 2025. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/01/14/baltic-nations-patrols-cables-russia/
24. CNN. "Ships, sea drones and AI: How NATO is hardening its defense of critical Baltic undersea cables," January 27, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/27/europe/nato-defense-baltic-undersea-cables-intl-cmd/index.html
25. Naval News. "NATO moves to enhance CUI surveillance activity in Baltic Sea," January 14, 2025. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/01/nato-moves-to-enhance-cui-surveillance-activity-in-baltic-sea/
26. Data Center Dynamics. "NATO launches Baltic Sentry for subsea cable security," January 15, 2025. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/nato-launches-baltic-sentry-for-subsea-cable-security/
27. Anadolu Agency. "NATO launches Baltic sentry mission to protect undersea cables," January 14, 2025. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/nato-launches-baltic-sentry-mission-to-protect-undersea-cables/3449935
28. Naval News. "'Baltic Sentry' demonstrates NATO MCM core role in countering CUI threats," January 30, 2025. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/01/baltic-sentry-demonstrates-nato-mcm-core-role-in-countering-cui-threats/
29. U.S. Congress. "H.R.10493 - SHIPS for America Act of 2024." https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/10493/text
30. U.S. Congress. "H.R.3151 - SHIPS for America Act of 2025." https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3151/text/ih
31. AMO Union. "Two SubCom cable ships to serve in US Cable Security Fleet." http://m.amo-union.net/article.php?a=4568
32. Sewkis Maritime Law. "The US Maritime Security Program." https://maritime.sewkis.com/blog/the-us-maritime-security-program
33. Congressman John Garamendi. "Garamendi, Kelly, Senators Young and Kelly, Introduce SHIPS for America Act," January 22, 2025. https://garamendi.house.gov/media/press-releases/garamendi-kelly-senators-young-and-kelly-introduce-ships-america-act
34. MARAD. "Maritime Security Program (MSP)." https://www.maritime.dot.gov/national-security/strategic-sealift/maritime-security-program-msp
35. Drishti IAS. "QUAD At Sea Ship Observer Mission," July 1, 2025. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/quad-at-sea-ship-observer-mission
36. U.S. Department of State. "2025 Quad Foreign Ministers' Meeting," July 2, 2025. https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2025/07/2025-quad-foreign-ministers-meeting

Multilateral maritime surveillance initiatives expand as China escalates gray zone attacks on Indo-Pacific communications infrastructure

The United States and its Indo-Pacific allies are rapidly expanding multilateral undersea cable protection initiatives as evidence mounts of systematic Chinese sabotage operations targeting critical communications infrastructure across the region.

Recent high-profile incidents point to a troubling pattern of deliberate subsea sabotage—acts made harder to trace as Russia and China deploy thousands of older, foreign-flagged vessels to obscure attribution, according to defense analysts tracking the emerging threat.

The urgency became clear in 2025 when multiple incidents involving Chinese-flagged vessels severing Taiwan's undersea cables raised alarm across the Indo-Pacific security community. In January, Taiwanese authorities investigated the Chinese-linked cargo vessel Shunxin39 suspected of cutting an international undersea cable off Taiwan's northern coast, followed by the February detention of the Chinese-crewed Hong Tai cargo ship suspected of damaging a cable connecting Taiwan to its outlying Penghu Islands.

NATO's Baltic Sentry Provides Indo-Pacific Blueprint

NATO launched its "Baltic Sentry" operation in January 2025 following suspected sabotage of undersea cables, deploying frigates, maritime patrol aircraft, and naval drones to monitor the Baltic Sea. The initiative provides a proven model for Indo-Pacific operations, defense experts say.

The Baltic Sentry mission consists of warships, AI-powered tracking systems, and F-35 stealth fighter jets, with reaction times reduced to "within a half an hour or an hour" compared to the 17 hours one suspected sabotage vessel dragged its anchor in 2024, according to NATO maritime commanders.

At least 11 Baltic cables have been damaged since October 2023, with the most recent being a fiber optic cable connecting Latvia and the Swedish island of Gotland, reported to have ruptured in January 2025.

Quad-Plus Framework Accelerates Operational Integration

The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue comprising Australia, India, Japan, and the United States has operationalized undersea cable protection through concrete initiatives. In July 2025, the four nations launched their first-ever "Quad-at-Sea Ship Observer Mission," with officers from each country embarking aboard the US Coast Guard Cutter Stratton to strengthen interoperability and maritime domain awareness.

Australia has established the Cable Connectivity and Resilience Centre as its contribution to the Quad Partnership for Cable Connectivity and Resilience, supporting infrastructure development and management of undersea telecommunications cables across the Indo-Pacific.

Research suggests expanding this framework into a "Quad-Plus" arrangement. Expanding cooperation to include capable partners like South Korea and the Philippines through the Indo-Pacific Partnership for Maritime Domain Awareness would enable a "Quad Plus" to better leverage each country's intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.

Legislative Support Builds for Cable Security Fleet

Congressional legislation is advancing to support dedicated cable repair infrastructure. The SHIPS for America Act includes Section 403 establishing a Cable Security Fleet, with funding authorized through the Maritime Security Trust Fund.

Two SubCom cable ships are designated to serve in the US Cable Security Fleet, modeled after the Maritime Security Program with annual stipends for participating vessels. The program addresses critical capacity gaps in cable repair capabilities.

Current global cable repair capacity remains inadequate for emerging threats. Globally, cable repair times currently average 40 days, with repairs in Southeast Asia taking twice as long as those in the North Atlantic. Of the 62 major cable ships that operate worldwide, only nineteen are dedicated to cable maintenance, and only two are US-flagged and US-operated.

Taiwan Emerges as Primary Target

Taiwan has become the focal point of cable sabotage operations, with Taiwan currently connected via 24 subsea cables, and in a contingency, China could covertly sever them, leaving 23 million Taiwanese isolated from the rest of the world.

Between early 2023 and early 2025, multiple incidents of suspected undersea cable sabotage occurred around Taiwan, including Chinese vessels severing cables to the Matsu Islands in February 2023, the Shunxin-39 damaging cables near Keelung in January 2025, and the Hong Tai 58 damaging cables between Taiwan and Penghu in February 2025.

The frequency of incidents has prompted Taiwan to designate cable infrastructure as critical national assets. In 2024, Taiwan's Ministry of Digital Affairs designated 10 domestic submarine cables as critical infrastructure, ensuring heightened security measures and government oversight.

Technology Integration and Satellite Backup

The undersea cable protection strategy incorporates advanced surveillance technologies and satellite communications as backup systems. Public-private partnerships, such as the Maritime Security Consortium, can help the US and Southeast Asian partners expand the use of low-cost, allied-made technology to improve subsea cable monitoring.

Satellite constellation development provides partial redundancy. Taiwan is developing satellite constellations with Eutelsat OneWeb and Amazon's Kuiper, and plans to build more than 700 satellite receiver stations to ensure a basic level of internet connectivity even if cables are cut.

However, satellites cannot fully replace cable capacity. Google's three-year-old Grace Hopper cable can transmit up to 350 terabits per second, a 300-fold improvement over the latest V3 Starlink satellites with speeds maxed at 1 terabit per second.

International Legal Framework Development

The United States is pursuing enhanced international legal protections for undersea cables. In October 2024, 17 nations including the United States, Australia, and Japan endorsed a joint statement on undersea cable security, committing to resist "undue influence by a third country on suppliers and service providers" and follow "best practices for permitting and regulation".

The US should ratify and propose new provisions to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea that extend subsea cable protections beyond countries' 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zones, drawing from the 1884 Submarine Cable Convention.

Strategic Implications

Defense analysts warn that cable sabotage represents a new dimension in great power competition. Subsea sabotage marks a new era in gray zone warfare, and the United States and its partners have a narrow window to expose and confront this threat before it becomes the new normal.

The threat extends beyond the Indo-Pacific. Countries have come to rely on a network of cables and pipes under the sea for their energy and communications, supporting about US$9 trillion worth of trade per day. A coordinated attack on this network could undoubtedly have devastating consequences.

However, experts note the technical challenges involved in systematic sabotage. Deliberately snagging a pipeline with a dragging anchor in relatively shallow waters can cause a lot of damage, but it is fairly indiscriminate trick with a shelf life, since the damage can be repaired, and deniability becomes increasingly difficult.

The Quad-Plus framework represents a measured response that balances deterrence with diplomatic stability, offering a multilateral approach to protecting the digital infrastructure that underpins the modern global economy.

---

Sources

1. Claffey, Ryan. "How the US should push the Quad-Plus to protect undersea cables." Breaking Defense, September 4, 2025. https://breakingdefense.com/2025/09/how-the-us-should-push-the-quad-plus-to-protect-undersea-cables/
2. Cannon, Brendon J. "Undersea cable security in the Indo-Pacific: Enhancing the Quad's collaborative approach." Marine Policy, Volume 171, January 2025. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24004159
3. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. "The Quad." https://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/regional-architecture/quad
4. Singh, Lisa. "The Quad needs to talk security for subsea cables." Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/quad-needs-talk-security-subsea-cables
5. Hemrajani, Asha. "The Quad Partnership for Cable Connectivity and Resilience." RSIS Commentary, 2023. https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/the-quad-partnership-for-cable-connectivity-and-resilience/
6. U.S. Department of State. "Joint Statement on the Security and Resilience of Undersea Cables in a Globally Digitalized World," October 2, 2024. https://2021-2025.state.gov/joint-statement-on-the-security-and-resilience-of-undersea-cables-in-a-globally-digitalized-world/
7. Cannon, Brendon J. "Quad needs to protect vulnerable undersea cables." Asia Times, February 16, 2024. https://asiatimes.com/2024/02/quad-needs-to-protect-vulnerable-undersea-cables/
8. RAND Corporation. "Undersea Cables Are Vulnerable to Sabotage—but This Takes Skill and Specialist Equipment," July 8, 2025. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2025/07/undersea-cables-are-vulnerable-to-sabotage-but.html
9. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. "Cable Connectivity and Resilience Centre." https://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/regional-architecture/quad/cable-connectivity-and-resilience-centre
10. Radio New Zealand. "The new threat to the undersea cables keeping our internet going," March 24, 2025. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/545872/the-new-threat-to-the-undersea-cables-keeping-our-internet-going
11. CNN. "Taiwan detains Chinese-crewed ship suspected of cutting undersea cable," February 26, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/25/asia/taiwan-detains-ship-undersea-cable-intl-hnk/index.html
12. Voice of America. "Chinese vessel suspected of damaging undersea cable near Taiwan," January 7, 2025. https://www.voanews.com/a/chinese-vessel-suspected-of-damaging-undersea-cable-near-taiwan/7926977.html
13. CNN. "Analysis: A cut undersea internet cable is making Taiwan worried about 'gray zone' tactics from Beijing," January 10, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/09/china/undersea-cable-taiwan-intl-hnk/index.html
14. Taipei Times. "Chinese vessel cut subsea cable near Taiwan: report," January 7, 2025. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2025/01/07/2003829790
15. The War Zone. "Taiwan Coast Guard Blames Chinese-Owned Ship For Cutting Undersea Communications Cable," January 6, 2025. https://www.twz.com/news-features/taiwan-coast-guard-blames-chinese-owned-ship-for-cutting-undersea-communications-cable
16. Global Taiwan Institute. "China's Undersea Cable Sabotage and Taiwan's Digital Vulnerabilities," June 4, 2025. https://globaltaiwan.org/2025/06/taiwans-digital-vulnerabilities/
17. Global Taiwan Institute. "Countering China's Subsea Cable Sabotage," March 25, 2025. https://globaltaiwan.org/2025/03/countering-chinas-subsea-cable-sabotage/
18. Yahoo News. "Chinese ship 'severs undersea cables around Taiwan'," January 5, 2025. https://www.yahoo.com/news/chinese-ship-severs-undersea-cables-202527317.html
19. Al Jazeera. "As undersea cables break off Europe and Taiwan, proving sabotage is tough," March 12, 2025. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/3/10/as-undersea-cables-break-down-proving-sabotage-a-difficult-task
20. Foreign Policy. "Chinese Ships May Have Severed Taiwan's Island Internet Cables, Again," January 23, 2025. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/01/23/taiwan-china-cables-internet-matsu-islands/
21. NATO. "NATO launches 'Baltic Sentry' to increase critical infrastructure security," January 14, 2025. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_232122.htm
22. Defense News. "11 Baltic cables damaged in 15 months, pushing NATO to boost security," January 28, 2025. https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2025/01/28/11-baltic-cables-damaged-in-15-months-pushing-nato-to-boost-security/
23. The Washington Post. "NATO announces Baltic Sentry operation to protect cables from sabotage," January 14, 2025. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/01/14/baltic-nations-patrols-cables-russia/
24. CNN. "Ships, sea drones and AI: How NATO is hardening its defense of critical Baltic undersea cables," January 27, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/27/europe/nato-defense-baltic-undersea-cables-intl-cmd/index.html
25. Naval News. "NATO moves to enhance CUI surveillance activity in Baltic Sea," January 14, 2025. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/01/nato-moves-to-enhance-cui-surveillance-activity-in-baltic-sea/
26. Data Center Dynamics. "NATO launches Baltic Sentry for subsea cable security," January 15, 2025. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/nato-launches-baltic-sentry-for-subsea-cable-security/
27. Anadolu Agency. "NATO launches Baltic sentry mission to protect undersea cables," January 14, 2025. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/nato-launches-baltic-sentry-mission-to-protect-undersea-cables/3449935
28. Naval News. "'Baltic Sentry' demonstrates NATO MCM core role in countering CUI threats," January 30, 2025. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/01/baltic-sentry-demonstrates-nato-mcm-core-role-in-countering-cui-threats/
29. U.S. Congress. "H.R.10493 - SHIPS for America Act of 2024." https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/10493/text
30. U.S. Congress. "H.R.3151 - SHIPS for America Act of 2025." https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3151/text/ih
31. AMO Union. "Two SubCom cable ships to serve in US Cable Security Fleet." http://m.amo-union.net/article.php?a=4568
32. Sewkis Maritime Law. "The US Maritime Security Program." https://maritime.sewkis.com/blog/the-us-maritime-security-program
33. Congressman John Garamendi. "Garamendi, Kelly, Senators Young and Kelly, Introduce SHIPS for America Act," January 22, 2025. https://garamendi.house.gov/media/press-releases/garamendi-kelly-senators-young-and-kelly-introduce-ships-america-act
34. MARAD. "Maritime Security Program (MSP)." https://www.maritime.dot.gov/national-security/strategic-sealift/maritime-security-program-msp
35. Drishti IAS. "QUAD At Sea Ship Observer Mission," July 1, 2025. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/quad-at-sea-ship-observer-mission
36. U.S. Department of State. "2025 Quad Foreign Ministers' Meeting," July 2, 2025. https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2025/07/2025-quad-foreign-ministers-meeting

Undersea Cable Security: Quad-Plus Initiative Against Maritime Gray Zone Warfare | Claude | Claude

How the US should push the Quad-Plus to protect undersea cables - Breaking Defense

China Unveils Revolutionary Hypersonic Arsenal at Historic Victory Day Parade

YJ-19 scramjet air-breathing hypersonic cruise missile.

Beijing showcases advanced weapons systems including new DF-61 ICBM and world's first operational air-breathing hypersonic cruise missile

BEIJING, September 3, 2025 — China demonstrated its rapidly advancing military capabilities on Wednesday during its largest military parade in six years, unveiling an array of cutting-edge weapons systems that signal a new era in global military technology. The Victory Day parade, commemorating the 80th anniversary of Japan's defeat in World War II, featured several previously unseen hypersonic missile systems, advanced directed-energy weapons, and autonomous underwater vehicles.

Hypersonic Breakthrough: The YJ-19 Takes Center Stage

The parade's most significant revelation was the debut of the YJ-19, marking the world's first publicly displayed operational air-breathing hypersonic cruise missile. Unlike traditional boost-glide hypersonic weapons, the YJ-19 employs a scramjet engine that provides continuous thrust throughout its flight profile, enabling sustained hypersonic speeds exceeding Mach 10.

Military analysts note that the YJ-19's visible air intake distinguishes it from other hypersonic designs, confirming its air-breathing propulsion system. This technology represents a significant advancement over conventional hypersonic weapons, as the scramjet engine allows for greater maneuverability and extended range compared to unpowered glide vehicles.

"The YJ-19 showcases breathtaking aerospace engineering," said defense expert Wang Yunfei. "Its scramjet propulsion system provides tactical advantages that could reshape naval warfare dynamics in contested waters."

New Generation Anti-Ship Missile Family

Alongside the YJ-19, China revealed three additional YJ-series anti-ship missiles, collectively representing a comprehensive upgrade to the People's Liberation Army Navy's (PLAN) maritime strike capabilities:

YJ-15: A compact ramjet-powered supersonic missile with similarities to the existing YJ-12, capable of speeds between Mach 3-4. The system offers cost-effective high-speed maritime strike capabilities and can be launched from multiple platforms including ships, aircraft, and ground-based launchers.

YJ-17: A hypersonic boost-glide waverider configuration missile designed to "skip" on shockwaves during flight. The weapon features a flat warhead optimized for hypersonic speeds and can achieve flexible maneuvering patterns that significantly complicate interception efforts. Reports suggest the YJ-17 can reach speeds up to Mach 8 with a range of approximately 750 miles.

YJ-20: A bi-conical hypersonic missile with a ballistic-style configuration, designed for vertical launch from naval vessels. The weapon's larger size suggests deployment primarily from major surface combatants such as Type 055 destroyers. Its bi-conical design provides shock wave protection for control surfaces during hypersonic flight phases.

All four missiles are compatible with China's Universal Vertical Launch System (UVLS), enabling deployment across the PLAN's modern fleet including Type 055 destroyers and potentially future aircraft carriers.

Strategic Nuclear Modernization: The DF-61 ICBM

China officially revealed its newest intercontinental ballistic missile, the DF-61, transported on massive 16-wheeled transporter-erector-launchers (TELs). Military experts believe the DF-61 represents the successor to the DF-41 ICBM, with enhanced range and payload capabilities.

The Pentagon's 2024 annual report on Chinese military developments noted that Beijing was developing new-generation ICBMs to "significantly improve its nuclear-capable missile forces." Independent assessments suggest China has expanded its nuclear arsenal to approximately 600 warheads, with production capabilities for further expansion.

The parade also featured the DF-31BJ, a silo-based variant of the existing DF-31 system, highlighting China's parallel development of both mobile and fixed strategic missile systems.

Revolutionary Directed-Energy Weapons

For the first time, China publicly displayed operational laser weapon systems designed for anti-drone and air defense missions. Two distinct systems were revealed:

• Naval Laser System: A large directed-energy weapon designed for shipboard air defense, capable of intercepting aircraft and missiles at close range
• Mobile Laser System: A truck-mounted laser weapon for ground force protection, optimized for counter-drone operations

The systems employ high-energy laser beams to physically damage or destroy targets, offering cost-effective alternatives to traditional kinetic interceptors. Each laser engagement costs significantly less than conventional missiles while providing near-instantaneous target engagement.

China also demonstrated high-power microwave weapons capable of disabling multiple drone targets simultaneously through electromagnetic interference, addressing the growing threat of drone swarm attacks.

Advanced Underwater Capabilities

The parade featured China's newest extra-large uncrewed underwater vehicles (XLUUVs), including the AJX002 system. Estimated at approximately 60 feet in length, these autonomous submarines employ pump-jet propulsion for reduced acoustic signatures and extended operational endurance.

Military analysts note that China operates the world's largest XLUUV program, with at least five distinct types reportedly in service. These platforms can conduct intelligence gathering, mine warfare, and anti-submarine operations across vast oceanic distances.

Autonomous Combat Systems

Beyond traditional weapons platforms, the parade showcased China's advancing autonomous military capabilities. Robot dogs mounted on armored vehicles demonstrated potential applications for battlefield logistics, reconnaissance, and potentially combat operations. The systems represent China's integration of artificial intelligence into military operations, reflecting what experts describe as "intelligent warfare" concepts.

Technical Analysis and Implications

The weapons systems displayed represent several technological achievements:

Propulsion Advances: The YJ-19's scramjet engine technology demonstrates China's mastery of hypersonic air-breathing propulsion, a capability that has challenged Western defense programs for decades.

Materials Science: The ability to sustain hypersonic flight requires advanced materials capable of withstanding extreme thermal and structural stresses, indicating significant progress in Chinese aerospace materials.

Guidance Systems: All hypersonic weapons require sophisticated guidance and control systems to maintain accuracy while maneuvering at extreme speeds, suggesting advances in Chinese sensor and computing technologies.

Manufacturing Scale: The diversity and apparent operational readiness of displayed systems indicates substantial manufacturing capabilities and defense industrial capacity.

Regional Security Impact

The new weapons systems significantly alter regional military balance, particularly in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait. The combination of hypersonic anti-ship missiles and advanced air defense systems creates substantial challenges for traditional U.S. naval operations in the Western Pacific.

The YJ-series missiles' vertical launch compatibility enables widespread deployment across China's modern naval fleet, effectively expanding the PLA Navy's strike envelope. Their hypersonic speeds compress reaction times for defending forces while their maneuverability complicates interception efforts.

International Response

The parade was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, demonstrating expanding military cooperation among nations challenging Western military dominance.

U.S. and allied defense officials are reportedly conducting detailed assessments of the displayed systems to understand their capabilities and develop appropriate countermeasures. The revelation of operational hypersonic weapons systems is expected to accelerate Western hypersonic and counter-hypersonic development programs.

Looking Forward

Wednesday's parade represents more than a historical commemoration; it signals China's emergence as a peer competitor in advanced military technology. The systems displayed indicate years of intensive research and development investment, with several technologies appearing to exceed current Western capabilities.

The integration of hypersonic weapons, directed-energy systems, and autonomous platforms suggests China's military modernization is approaching a new phase of technological sophistication. As one defense analyst noted, "We're witnessing the debut of weapons systems that could define 21st-century warfare."

The parade confirms China's transformation from a regional military power to a global force capable of challenging established military hierarchies, with implications extending far beyond the Asia-Pacific region.

---

SIDEBAR: International Attendance and Global Reactions

The "Axis of Upheaval" Gathers

The parade represented what analysts called an unprecedented gathering of an "Axis of Upheaval," with Chinese President Xi Jinping hosting leaders from nations challenging Western-led international order. For the first time in public, Xi appeared alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, with Kim bringing his teenage daughter Kim Ju Ae in what experts view as a clear succession signal.

Key Foreign Attendees:

• Vladimir Putin (Russia) - First trilateral meeting with Xi and Kim
• Kim Jong Un (North Korea) - First multilateral diplomatic event attendance
• Masoud Pezeshkian (Iran) - Representing the "resistance axis"
• Shehbaz Sharif (Pakistan) - Military chief also attended
• Min Aung Hlaing (Myanmar) - US-sanctioned junta leader
• Robert Fico (Slovakia) - One of only two European leaders
• Aleksandar Vučić (Serbia) - Pro-Russia stance
• Eight Southeast Asian leaders reflecting China's regional influence

Notable Western Absences

Conspicuously absent were leaders from major Western capitals, despite China's crucial Allied partnership in World War II's Pacific Theater. No leaders from the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, or other major NATO allies attended. Compared to the 2015 parade, which featured broader international participation, the 2025 event showed decreased leader-level presence from the Caribbean, Middle East, Oceania, and South America.

Japan reportedly urged European and Asian leaders not to attend, citing excessive anti-Japanese sentiment, prompting a formal Chinese diplomatic protest. South Korea's president declined China's invitation, marking a shift from 2015 when President Park Geun-hye attended.

Trump Administration Response

U.S. President Donald Trump responded directly to the parade gathering, posting on Truth Social: "Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against The United States of America". However, Trump also stated he was "not concerned at all" about the alliance challenging the U.S.

Pentagon and Defense Community Reactions

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth previously expressed concerns that Chinese hypersonic missiles "could sink all U.S. aircraft carriers within the first minutes of a potential conflict," highlighting the Pentagon's assessment of Beijing's anti-ship capabilities. The U.S. has allocated $6.9 billion for fiscal year 2025 to hypersonic missile research in response to Chinese and Russian developments.

Retired Admiral James Stavridis warned that while Putin may benefit from the alliance, "you are ultimately going to end up as a very junior partner in that relationship" with China. He characterized the display as Xi's effort to establish an alternative world order challenging U.S. and Western allies.

Strategic Implications for Global Balance

Shifting Alliance Structures: The parade demonstrated "shifting patterns in Chinese influence, with Western leaders largely absent" while showcasing stronger ties with authoritarian allies. The gathering represents the most visible manifestation of what some analysts term a "new Cold War" dynamic.

Maritime Domain Impact: Defense specialists note that the new hypersonic anti-ship missiles "compress engagement timelines from minutes to seconds while following unpredictable flight paths that challenge existing interceptor technologies." For naval forces within 1,000 nautical miles of Chinese territory—encompassing virtually all critical Pacific shipping lanes—the strategic environment has fundamentally changed.

Nuclear Balance: The DF-61 ICBM debut occurs as China expands its nuclear arsenal from an estimated 600 warheads with continued production capabilities, representing one of the most rapid expansions among nuclear-armed states. Pentagon assessments indicate Beijing seeks "a larger and more diverse nuclear force, including both lower-yield precision strike weapons and higher-yield multi-warhead missiles".

Economic Warfare Dimension: Taiwan's analysis suggests China spent over $5 billion (1.5% of its defense budget) on the parade alone, raising questions about priorities amid domestic economic challenges. The display serves both military deterrence and economic signaling purposes.

Technology Competition: Investment analysts note that "the traditional assumption that American technological superiority provides a permanent strategic advantage is becoming questionable. Markets are beginning to price in a more competitive strategic environment".

The parade represents more than military pageantry—it marks the emergence of a coherent challenge to the Western-led international order, with potential ramifications extending from the Taiwan Strait to global trade routes and alliance structures.

---

Sources

1. CNN Live Coverage - China's Military Parade Unveils DF-61 Missiles. CNN International, September 3, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/china-military-parade-xi-jinping-09-03-25-intl-hnk
2. "From HQ-9C, DF-61 Missiles To Stealth Fighter Jets: China Showcases Deadliest Weapons During Victory Day Military Parade." Free Press Journal, September 3, 2025. https://www.freepressjournal.in/world/from-hq-9c-df-61-missiles-to-stealth-fighter-jets-china-showcases-deadliest-weapons-during-victory-day-military-parade-videos
3. "China's New DF-61 Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Breaks Cover." The War Zone, September 3, 2025. https://www.twz.com/nuclear/chinas-new-df-61-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-breaks-cover
4. "All The New Chinese Missiles Spotted During Its Massive Military Parade Rehearsal." The War Zone, August 20, 2025. https://www.twz.com/land/all-the-new-chinese-missiles-spotted-during-its-massive-military-parade-rehearsal
5. "YJ-15 missile, YJ-19, YJ-17, YJ-20 hypersonic missiles make debut." Global Security, September 3, 2025. https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/china/2025/09/china-250903-globaltimes13.htm
6. "Beijing Unveils Hypersonic Cruise Missile with Mach 10 Strike Speed." Defence Security Asia, August 20, 2025. https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/china-hypersonic-cruise-missile-yj19-yj20-yj15-yj17-pla-navy/
7. "YJ-19, China's first hypersonic cruise missile, is based on breathtaking science." South China Morning Post, September 2, 2025. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3324050/breathtaking-science-behind-yj-19-chinas-first-hypersonic-cruise-missile
8. "Analysis: China's military display shows it has the might to back up Xi's vision." CNN, September 3, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/03/china/china-military-parade-analysis-intl-hnk-ml-dst
9. "Anti-drone laser, microwave, missile and artillery weapons appear at China's V-Day military parade." Global Security, September 3, 2025. https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/china/2025/09/china-250903-globaltimes06.htm
10. "China modernizes its nuclear capabilities with new DF-61 intercontinental ballistic missile." Army Recognition, September 3, 2025. https://armyrecognition.com/news/army-news/2025/china-modernizes-its-nuclear-triad-with-new-df-61-intercontinental-ballistic-missile
11. YJ-19, China’s first hypersonic cruise missile, is based on breathtaking science | South China Morning Post

General Atomics and Kepler Communications Successfully Demonstrate Air-to-Space Optical Communications Capability

GA-EMS, Kepler Achieve Air-to-Space Optical Communications Breakthrough

Multi-vendor interoperability demonstration validates SDA's open standards approach for proliferated space architecture

General Atomics Electromagnetic Systems (GA-EMS) and Kepler Communications have successfully demonstrated bi-directional air-to-space optical communications between a GA-EMS Optical Communication Terminal (OCT) mounted on an aircraft and a Space Development Agency (SDA) Tranche 0-compatible Kepler satellite in low Earth orbit, marking a critical milestone for the Space Development Agency's Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture (PWSA).

The demonstration, conducted from late July through late August under SDA contract, achieved pointing, acquisition, tracking, and lock between the airborne terminal and satellite, then successfully transferred data packets to validate both uplink and downlink capabilities. The test utilized GA-EMS's OCT mounted on a 12-inch Laser Airborne Communication turret (LAC-12) developed by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems' Precision Pointing Group aboard a Twin Otter aircraft.

Validating Multi-Vendor Interoperability

The achievement represents more than a technical milestone—it demonstrates the robustness of SDA's open OCT standard for enabling interoperability between optical terminals built by different manufacturers, a cornerstone of the agency's multi-vendor constellation approach.

"This successful space-airborne communication demonstration represents a breakthrough improvement in building a resilient space architecture. Achieving multi-vendor interoperability validates SDA's leadership in the optical communication arena," said Gurpartap "GP" Sandhoo, SDA deputy director.

The interoperability validation is particularly significant as SDA has been working to establish industry-wide standards while managing supply chain challenges that have delayed Tranche 1 launches from spring to late summer 2025. The agency has once again pushed back the launch of its first batch of operational data transport and missile-tracking satellites, and is now targeting a date in "late summer 2025" to put the space vehicles on orbit.

Building Toward Operational Capability

GA-EMS's OCT is designed to scale across multi-domain communications spanning space, air, land, and sea platforms, as well as various orbital regimes. "Our OCT is designed to close a communications gap, enabling secure, robust data transfers to support tactical and operational missions," said Scott Forney, president of GA-EMS.

Under a separate SDA contract, GA-EMS designed and built two OCT systems that will fly on two GA-75 spacecraft to support future LEO airborne-to-space demonstrations for Tranche 1. Those spacecraft launch in 2026. The GA-75 is a resilient, modular half-ESPA bus design capable of supporting various communications and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance payloads.

Kepler's Growing SDA Role

Kepler Communications has emerged as a key commercial partner in SDA's optical communications ecosystem. The company was the first commercial entity to successfully demonstrate SDA-compatible optical inter-satellite links (OISLs) on orbit following the launch of two Pathfinder satellites in November 2023 equipped with Tesat SCOT80 optical terminals.

In May 2025, Kepler successfully demonstrated space-to-ground optical data relay with French optical ground station company Cailabs, achieving full SDA standard data rates and acquisition in multiple scenarios. The company has also secured a position on SDA's Hybrid Acquisition for proliferated Low-earth Orbit (HALO) contract and entered into a Space Act Agreement with NASA's Communications Services Project.

Robert Conrad, president of Kepler US, emphasized the demonstration's broader implications: "By pairing Kepler's on-orbit optical capabilities with GA-EMS' OCT, we've shown what's possible when space and aviation systems work seamlessly together. This achievement builds on our milestone of establishing bi-directional space-to-ground communications with Kepler's SDA Tranche 0-compatible satellites and reinforces how commercial space operators will be partners in delivering secure, high-throughput connectivity for the defense community and the broader commercial sector."

Standards Evolution and Industry Impact

SDA continues to refine its OCT standards to reduce technical risk across upcoming tranches. The agency released OCT Standard v3.2.0 alongside v4.0.0, with v3.2.0 intended as the standard of record for Tranche 3, while a smaller number of terminals will comply with v4.0.0. These standards are backward compatible with previous versions and aim to ensure interoperability across vendors while enabling a robust marketplace.

The optical communications push comes as SDA works to field its first operational constellation. Skyloom completed delivery of 42 flight-ready optical communication terminals to York Space Systems for SDA's Tranche 1 Transport Layer program in March 2025, with York progressing toward an additional batch of 42 terminals for Plane 2.

Technical Heritage and Future Applications

GA-EMS brings significant optical communications heritage to the SDA mission. The company has previously demonstrated air-to-air laser communications between two King Air aircraft in 2022 and completed fully-networked demonstrations using multiple laser communication terminals spanning ground, mobile, and airborne platforms.

The LAC-12 terminal used in the demonstration provides anti-jamming communications with 300 times the data carrying capacity of conventional radio frequency satellite communications systems and provides air-to-space, air, ground, and maritime relay connectivity.

For Kepler, the demonstration advances its vision of The Kepler Network as a hybrid RF and optical constellation. The company's first tranche of optical data relay satellites is scheduled to launch in Q4 2025 and will include nine satellites and a spare in sun-synchronous orbit, with plans to expand to full LEO coverage approximately two years later.

Operational Implications

The successful air-to-space demonstration represents a critical step toward multi-domain optical communications within the PWSA. Since achieving its first successful space-to-air connect in July, SDA has repeated the experiment several times, with agency officials noting that connections are becoming more routine, exchanging gigabits of data each time.

This progress comes as SDA works to demonstrate Link 16 connectivity through its transport layer satellites, which use secure radio waves to enable real-time, jam-resistant, and encrypted communications. The optical communications layer adds another dimension of resilience and capability to the overall architecture.

The demonstration validates SDA's approach of leveraging both traditional defense contractors and commercial space companies to rapidly field advanced capabilities. As the agency prepares for Tranche 1 launches later this year and looks ahead to Tranche 2 and beyond, the successful interoperability between GA-EMS and Kepler systems provides confidence in the multi-vendor strategy underlying the PWSA.

---

Sources

1. General Atomics. "General Atomics and Kepler Communications Successfully Demonstrate Air-to-Space Optical Communications Capability." September 2, 2025. https://www.ga.com
2. Space Development Agency. "SDA Seeks Industry Input on Optical Communication Terminal Standard Update." January 27, 2025. https://www.sda.mil/sda-seeks-industry-input-on-optical-communication-terminal-standard-update/
3. Space Development Agency. "Resources - OCT Standards." April 8, 2025. https://www.sda.mil/home/work-with-us/resources/
4. Via Satellite. "Skyloom Delivers SDA's Transport Layer Optical Terminals for York Space Systems." March 27, 2025. https://www.satellitetoday.com/government-military/2025/03/27/skyloom-delivers-sdas-transport-layer-optical-terminals-for-york-space-systems/
5. DefenseScoop. "Supply chain woes further delay launch of SDA's first operational satellites." March 11, 2025. https://defensescoop.com/2025/03/10/sda-delays-satellite-launch-tranche-1-supply-chain-woes-2025/
6. Payload Space. "York Space Systems Delivers Tranche 1 SDA Sats." August 28, 2025. https://payloadspace.com/york-space-systems-delivers-tranche-1-sda-sats/
7. Kepler Communications. "Kepler Validates SDA-Compatible Optical Technology For Space Data Relay Constellation." June 11, 2024. https://kepler.space/kepler-validates-sda-compatible-optical-technology-for-space-data-relay-constellation/
8. Via Satellite. "General Atomics and Kepler Demonstrate Air-to-Space Optical Communications." September 2, 2025. https://www.satellitetoday.com/government-military/2025/09/02/general-atomics-and-kepler-demonstrate-air-to-space-optical-communications/
9. Kepler Communications. "Kepler Validates SDA-Compatible Space-to-Ground Laser Links with Cailabs." May 14, 2025. https://kepler.space/kepler-validates-sda-compatible-space-to-ground-laser-links-with-cailabs/
10. Kepler Communications. "Kepler Wins Space Development Agency HALO Contract." October 23, 2024. https://kepler.space/kepler-wins-space-development-agency-halo-contract/
11. Kepler Communications. "Kepler Enters Space Act Agreement with NASA's Communications Services Project." October 3, 2024. https://kepler.space/kepler-enters-space-act-agreement-with-nasas-communications-services-project/
12. Kepler Communications. "Kepler Announces On-Orbit Compute Capacity on Optical Data Relay Network." April 7, 2025. https://kepler.space/kepler-announces-on-orbit-compute-capacity-on-optical-data-relay-network/
13. General Atomics Aeronautical Systems. "LAC-12 Terminal Product Page." https://www.ga-asi.com/multi-mission-payloads/lac12-pod
14. General Atomics Aeronautical Systems. "GA-ASI Demonstrates Air-to-Air Laser Communications." October 25, 2022. https://www.ga-asi.com/ga-asi-demonstrates-air-to-air-laser-communications
15. General Atomics Aeronautical Systems. "GA-ASI Demonstrates Network Relay Using Laser Communications." December 1, 2022. https://www.ga-asi.com/ga-asi-demonstrates-network-relay-using-laser-communications
16. General Atomics. "General Atomics Awarded Space Development Agency Contract to Demonstrate Optical Communication Terminals." January 24, 2024. https://www.ga.com/ga-awarded-space-development-agency-contract-to-demonstrate-optical-communication-terminals
17. General Atomics. "General Atomics Partners with Space Development Agency to Demonstrate Optical Intersatellite Link." June 5, 2020. https://www.ga.com/general-atomics-partners-with-space-development-agency-to-demonstrate-optical-intersatellite-link
18. C4ISRNet. "Space Development Agency demos key space-to-air communications link." September 2, 2025. https://www.c4isrnet.com/space/2025/09/02/space-development-agency-demos-key-space-to-air-communications-link/
19. Defense Industry. "General Atomics, Kepler and SDA achieve breakthrough in air-to-space optical communications test." September 2, 2025. https://defence-industry.eu/general-atomics-kepler-and-sda-achieve-breakthrough-in-air-to-space-optical-communications-test/
20. General Atomics and Kepler Communications Successfully Demonstrate Air-to-Space Optical Communications Capability | General Atomics

EU Accelerates Satellite Defense Against GPS Jamming Threats

Commission President's Aircraft Hit by Russian Interference Sparks Urgent LEO Deployment

September 1, 2025 — The European Union is fast-tracking deployment of additional low Earth orbit satellites and upgrading ground systems to counter escalating GPS jamming threats, following a high-profile incident involving European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's aircraft over the weekend.

EU Defence Commissioner Andrius Kubilius announced Monday that the bloc will deploy supplementary LEO satellites to enhance resilience against electronic warfare interference, with particular focus on strengthening detection capabilities and satellite communication networks. The announcement came after GPS systems aboard von der Leyen's flight to Bulgaria were jammed on Sunday, an incident Bulgarian authorities suspect involved Russian interference.

Incident Reveals Strategic Vulnerability

The jamming of the Commission President's aircraft underscores a pattern of satellite navigation disruption that has intensified since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. GPS interference has become so pervasive that it now affects satellites up to 1,200 miles above Earth's surface, according to experts from the Aerospace Corporation who presented findings at the ASCEND space conference.

John Janeski of Aerospace Corp noted that cubesats operating in LEO show "a giant hole above the Ukraine region" where GPS reception is blocked, demonstrating how ground-based jamming systems can create interference zones extending well into orbital altitudes. The phenomenon particularly affects LEO satellites, which require precise positioning and timing data to coordinate with constellation partners.

Multi-Pronged Defense Strategy

The EU's response centers on integrating new LEO satellites with existing systems including Galileo, Europe's global navigation satellite system currently comprising 27 operational satellites. This hybrid architecture aims to provide redundant signals that are harder to jam, leveraging LEO constellations' inherently stronger signal strength compared to traditional medium Earth orbit systems.

Spanish company GMV is upgrading Galileo's Reference Centre in the Netherlands under a €27.5 million contract, enabling real-time monitoring of signal quality and faster detection of jamming incidents. The upgrade, dubbed "V2," will also implement signal authentication services and enhanced cybersecurity measures by 2026.

Recent Galileo constellation additions have strengthened the system's robustness. Two new satellites launched in September 2024 brought the constellation to its designed configuration with operational satellites plus spares in each orbital plane. Six additional first-generation satellites are scheduled for deployment through 2026, while second-generation satellites with fully digital payloads and enhanced anti-jamming capabilities are in development.

IRIS² Constellation Takes Shape

Central to Europe's long-term satellite security is the €10.6 billion IRIS² program, which signed its concession contract in December 2024. The SpaceRISE consortium—comprising SES, Eutelsat, and Hispasat—will deploy 290 satellites across multiple orbits by 2030, including 264 in LEO and 18 in medium Earth orbit.

IRIS² represents Europe's most ambitious space security initiative, designed to provide encrypted communications for governmental users while offering commercial services. The multi-orbital approach is expected to deliver performance equivalent to 1,000 single-orbit satellites, according to EU officials.

The constellation will complement existing programs including GOVSATCOM, which pools satellite capacity from five EU member states starting in 2025. This incremental approach allows Europe to enhance secure communications capabilities while the full IRIS² system comes online.

Industry Response and Global Competition

The GPS jamming crisis has accelerated anti-jamming technology development across allied nations. The U.S. Space Force expects to achieve major anti-jamming milestones in 2025, including certification of the Military GPS User Equipment (MGUE) Increment 1 receivers and deployment of GPS III satellites with enhanced jam resistance.

Commercial firms are also developing alternative positioning systems. Xona Space Systems received a $4.6 million Air Force Research Laboratory contract to demonstrate its Pulsar LEO constellation, with first launch planned for June 2025 and operational services by 2027 through a 258-satellite network.

For European aerospace companies, the threat environment has created new opportunities. The IRIS² program emphasizes SME participation and innovation, while ground segment upgrades require specialized anti-jamming technologies and signal processing capabilities.

Technical Challenges and Timeline

Implementation faces significant technical hurdles. LEO satellites require precise positioning data to maintain formation flying and coordinate inter-satellite links, making them vulnerable to the very interference they're designed to counter. Engineers are developing hybrid solutions combining GPS, Galileo, and other GNSS signals with inertial navigation systems for redundancy.

The timeline for enhanced protection remains aggressive. While some upgrades to existing systems will be operational by 2026, full IRIS² services won't begin until 2030. In the interim, Europe must rely on incremental improvements to Galileo and coordination with allied systems.

Budgetary constraints also pose challenges, with the EU allocating substantial resources to space defense amid competing priorities. The IRIS² program represents 60% public funding, requiring sustained political commitment across multiple budget cycles.

Geopolitical Implications

The GPS jamming crisis highlights Europe's strategic vulnerability and dependence on satellite navigation for critical infrastructure. Beyond aviation safety, GPS timing signals underpin financial systems, power grids, and telecommunications networks—making satellite security a national security imperative.

The EU's response signals determination to achieve strategic autonomy in space, potentially straining relations with Russia while positioning Europe as a leader in satellite constellation security. The success of IRIS² and Galileo upgrades may establish templates for allied nations facing similar electronic warfare threats.

As jamming becomes a frontline tactic in hybrid warfare, Europe's investment in space-based defense capabilities represents both a near-term necessity and long-term strategic advantage in an increasingly contested electromagnetic environment.

---

Sources

1. Reuters - "EU Says Von Der Leyen's Plane GPS System Was Jammed, Russian Interference Suspected," September 1, 2025. https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2025-09-01/eu-says-von-der-leyens-plane-gps-system-was-jammed-russian-interference-suspected
2. Defense News - "EU to upgrade GPS systems as Russian jamming efforts spark response," March 12, 2025. https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2025/03/12/eu-to-upgrade-gps-systems-as-russian-jamming-efforts-spark-response/
3. Air & Space Forces Magazine - "GPS Jamming Extends to Orbit; Pentagon Bolstering Constellation," July 29, 2025. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/gps-jamming-extends-to-leo/
4. Air & Space Forces Magazine - "Anti-Jamming GPS Upgrades Coming This Year," April 30, 2025. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/gps-anti-jamming-upgrades-converging-2025/
5. European Commission - "Commission takes next step to deploy the IRIS² secure satellite system," December 16, 2024. https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/commission-takes-next-step-deploy-iris2-secure-satellite-system-2024-12-16_en
6. European Space Agency - "Two new satellites added to Galileo constellation for increased robustness," 2024. https://www.esa.int/Applications/Satellite_navigation/Galileo/Two_new_satellites_added_to_Galileo_constellation_for_increased_robustness
7. SpaceRISE Consortium - "IRIS² lifts off as European Commission and SpaceRISE sign contract in Brussels," December 16, 2024. https://www.spacerise.eu/article/iris-lifts-off-as-european-commission-and-spacerise
8. European Commission - "IRIS² | Secure Connectivity," 2025. https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/eu-space/iris2-secure-connectivity_en
9. Euro-SD - "GPS under threat," May 5, 2025. https://euro-sd.com/2025/05/articles/43949/gps-under-threat/
10. The Irish Times - "What is GPS jamming and why would Russia target flight carrying Ursula von der Leyen?" September 1, 2025. https://www.irishtimes.com/world/europe/2025/09/01/what-is-gps-jamming-and-why-would-russia-target-flight-carrying-ursula-von-der-leyen/
11. RNTF Foundation - "Conflict GPS jamming impacting LEO satellites," October 14, 2024. https://rntfnd.org/2024/10/14/conflict-gps-jamming-impacting-leo-satellites/
12. Septentrio - "OSNMA: the latest in GNSS anti-spoofing security," 2025. https://www.septentrio.com/en/learn-more/insights/osnma-latest-gnss-anti-spoofing-security
13. TS2.Space - "Global Navigation Showdown: How GPS III, Galileo, BeiDou & GLONASS Upgrades Will Change How You Navigate," June 21, 2025. https://ts2.tech/en/global-navigation-showdown-how-gps-iii-galileo-beidou-glonass-upgrades-will-change-how-you-navigate/
14. EUSPA - "IRIS² | EU Agency for the Space Programme," April 25, 2025. https://www.euspa.europa.eu/eu-space-programme/secure-satcom/iris2
15. SES Press Release - "SpaceRISE selected by European Commission to build and operate the IRIS² multi-orbit satellite constellation," October 31, 2024. https://www.ses.com/press-release/spacerise-selected-european-commission-build-and-operate-iris2-multi-orbit-satellite
16. EU Deploys LEO Satellites to Counter GPS Jamming and Russia Threats

General Atomics Bets $20 Million on Canadian Fusion Breakthrough

Defense contractor invests in tritium fuel cycle technology as fusion energy approaches commercial viability

By [Cl
August 31, 2025

SAN DIEGO — General Atomics announced a $20 million, 10-year strategic investment in a Canadian nuclear fusion venture this week, marking the defense contractor's biggest bet yet on clean fusion energy.

The investment in Fusion Fuel Cycles Inc. (FFC) will accelerate development of UNITY-2, the world's first fully integrated deuterium-tritium fuel cycle test facility. Scheduled for mid-2026 at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories in Ontario, the facility aims to solve one of fusion's most complex technical challenges.

Bottom Line: General Atomics' investment signals growing confidence that fusion power is approaching commercial viability, with the tritium fuel cycle representing a critical bottleneck that must be solved before fusion can deliver abundant clean energy.

The Fusion Fuel Challenge

Unlike nuclear fission, which splits heavy atoms, fusion combines hydrogen isotopes to release energy. UNITY-2 is designed to support magnetic confinement fusion systems, where powerful magnetic fields contain plasma in devices called tokamaks—the leading approach in fusion research.

The facility will simulate the complete deuterium-tritium fuel sequence—from discharge to purification and resupply. Tritium, a radioactive hydrogen isotope essential for fusion reactions, occurs naturally in only trace amounts. Future fusion plants must breed their own tritium from lithium, then extract, purify, and recycle it continuously—a process never demonstrated at commercial scale.

"Developing a practical fusion power plant demands that all core systems—including the fuel cycle—operate in concert," said Anantha Krishnan, senior vice president of the General Atomics Energy Group. "This collaboration directly targets one of the toughest challenges."

Market Momentum

The fusion sector has attracted $2.64 billion in global investment, with 84% of companies expecting to supply electricity before 2040. However, companies estimate needing $77 billion total—eight times current commitments—to bring pilot plants online.

General Atomics brings deep magnetic confinement expertise through its DIII-D tokamak, America's largest magnetic fusion research facility and only operational tokamak. The San Diego facility serves as a cornerstone of U.S. fusion research.

FFC, founded in 2024, combines Canadian Nuclear Laboratories' seven decades of tritium expertise with Japan's Kyoto Fusioneering. The partnership received Canadian government endorsement as part of the country's bid to become a global fusion hub.

Commercial Reality Check

The fusion industry faces deep skepticism rooted in decades of missed predictions. Since the 1970s, commercial fusion has consistently been "20-30 years away," earning the technology a reputation as perpetually distant.

Recent analysis suggests this pattern may be changing. Scientific expectations have progressed over four decades, with timelines shortening by 2.5 years every decade since 1985. Major breakthroughs at Lawrence Livermore's National Ignition Facility and rising private investment have renewed optimism.

Yet fundamental hurdles remain. Scientists don't fully understand "burning plasmas" that sustain themselves. No facility exists to test materials under decades-long fusion conditions. The complex engineering of extracting economical electricity remains unsolved.

Most experts agree fusion won't generate large-scale energy before 2050—possibly later. Lawrence Livermore Director Kim Budil says commercialization requires "probably decades" and "many fusion ignition events per minute."

As one fusion expert bluntly noted: "Anyone who tells me they'll have a working reactor in five or 10 years is either completely ignorant or a liar."

Strategic Implications

The investment reflects shifting energy technology priorities as governments seek fossil fuel alternatives. Magnetic confinement fusion promises abundant clean energy without fission's long-lived radioactive waste or renewables' intermittency challenges.

Canadian Industry Minister Mélanie Joly emphasized economic benefits: "This will strengthen Canada's competitive advantage in the green economy and create high-value jobs." The investment also fulfills General Atomics' Industrial and Technological Benefits obligations tied to Canada's MQ-9B aircraft procurement.

UNITY-2 will serve as an open testing platform for global fusion companies to validate tritium-processing components under realistic conditions. Success could accelerate the entire sector's technology readiness.

The Bottom Line

General Atomics' fusion investment diversifies beyond defense while leveraging decades of tokamak expertise. The partnership strengthens North American fusion collaboration, potentially creating a technology cluster competing with European and Asian efforts.

If UNITY-2 succeeds, it eliminates a major technical barrier to commercial fusion. However, even successful fuel cycle demonstration leaves enormous engineering challenges unsolved. Fusion plants will likely remain large, expensive, and complex compared to alternatives.

The investment signals growing confidence in fusion's technical feasibility, but commercial deployment remains measured in decades rather than years. Still, for an industry that has struggled with credibility, solving the tritium fuel cycle represents meaningful progress toward the ultimate goal of abundant clean energy.

---

Sources

1. General Atomics. "General Atomics Invests $20 Million in Canadian Nuclear Fusion Venture to Advance Tritium Fuel Cycle Technologies." August 25, 2025. https://www.ga.com/ga-invests-20-million-in-canadian-nuclear-fusion-venture-to-advance-tritium-fuel-cycle-technologies
2. Fusion Fuel Cycles Inc. "Fusion Fuel Cycles Inc. Secures General Atomics US$20 Million Investment in Flagship Project: UNITY-2." PR Newswire, August 27, 2025. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fusion-fuel-cycles-inc-secures-general-atomics-us20-million-investment-in-flagship-project-unity-2-302539982.html
3. Carbon Credits. "General Atomics Fuels UNITY-2 Fusion Project in Canada as Global Fusion Investment Hits $2.64 Billion." August 28, 2025. https://carboncredits.com/general-atomics-fuels-unity-2-fusion-project-in-canada-as-global-fusion-investment-hits-2-64-billion/
4. World Nuclear Association. "Nuclear Fusion Power." https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-fusion-power
5. Journal of Fusion Energy. "How Many Years Away is Fusion Energy? A Review." May 12, 2023. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10894-023-00361-z
6. Scientific American. "What Is the Future of Fusion Energy?" February 20, 2024. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-future-of-fusion-energy/
7. U.S. Government Accountability Office. "Fusion Energy: Potentially Transformative Technology Still Faces Fundamental Challenges." https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105813
8. OilPrice.com. "Commercial Nuclear Fusion May Still Be Decades Away." December 22, 2022. https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Commercial-Nuclear-Fusion-May-Still-Be-Decades-Away.html
9. American Nuclear Society. "General Atomics makes $20M investment in Canadian fusion venture." https://www.ans.org/news/article-7327/general-atomics-makes-20m-investment-in-canadian-fusion-venture/
10. Nuclear Engineering International. "General Atomics invests in Canadian fusion." August 27, 2025. https://www.neimagazine.com/news/general-atomics-invests-in-canadian-fusion/

General Atomics Investment News Story | Claude | Claude

General Atomics Investment News Story | Claude | Claude