Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Generative AI for Advanced UAV Networking

Refer to captionGenerative AI for Advanced UAV Networking

Summary

This article discusses the potential of Generative AI (GAI) in improving the performance of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) communications and networking. The key points are:

  1. 1. GAI has advantages over traditional AI methods like Discriminative AI (DAI) in terms of data enhancement, latent space representation, and creativity.
  2. 2. UAVs play important roles in communications and networking as relays, aerial base stations, edge computing devices, and attack detectors.
  3. 3. GAI can enhance UAV systems in the physical layer (channel estimation), network layer (topology management), and application layer (resource allocation).
  4. 4. The article presents a framework called SEMG (GAI-based UAV Spectrum Estimation Map Generator) that uses techniques like diffusion models and Large Language Models for spectrum map estimation and trajectory optimization in UAV networks.
  5. 5. Case studies demonstrate that the proposed GAI framework outperforms traditional methods like LSTM and DDPG in spectrum estimation accuracy and transmission rate optimization.
  6. 6. Future research directions include energy-efficient GAI on UAVs, secure GAI using blockchain, and multimodal processing of UAV video data using GAI.

In summary, the article makes a strong case for leveraging the power of GAI techniques to optimize various aspects of UAV communications and networking in dynamic environments. 

SEMG (GAI-based UAV Spectrum Estimation Map Generator) 

This is a novel framework proposed in the article for optimizing UAV spectrum estimation and trajectory planning using Generative AI (GAI) techniques. The framework consists of two main parts:

  1. Interaction Part:
    • Users provide raw prompts to the GAI agent based on task requirements, including text, images, audio, and video.
    • Prompt engineering is used to optimize the prompts, enabling better mapping of the downstream tasks to the pre-training tasks of the GAI agent.
    • Users can prepare fresh or proprietary data relevant to their needs, which is vectorized, indexed, and stored in a vector database.
    • The framework retrieves the vector database based on the user's query and selects the N most relevant data entries.
    • The selected data, serving as background context, is integrated with the query to form prompts that guide the Large Language Model (LLM) in generating appropriate strategies.
  2. Generation Part:
    • The current state of the environment is observed.
    • A diffusion model predicts noise and generates a solution based on the observed state.
    • The objective value is calculated, and the diffusion model's networks are updated according to the objective function and loss function designed by the LLM in the interaction part.
    • After training, the diffusion model can generate the corresponding spectrum estimation map based on the data collected by the UAV via the trained denoising network.

The effectiveness of the SEMG framework is demonstrated through two case studies:

  1. UAV-enabled Spectrum Estimation: The UAV measures SNR data in a portion of the target area, and the diffusion model optimizes the UAV's measurement trajectory to accurately predict the spectrum map of the entire target area based on limited measurement information.
  2. UAV-enabled Joint Spectrum Estimation and Rate Optimization: The UAV acts as both a spectrum estimator and a data transmitter, and the diffusion model generates the UAV exploitation trajectory to achieve accurate spectrum mapping and high transmission rates while considering energy constraints.

The case studies show that the SEMG framework outperforms traditional methods like LSTM and DDPG in terms of spectrum estimation accuracy and transmission rate optimization, demonstrating the potential of GAI techniques in enhancing UAV communications and networking performance.

Figures

The article contains four figures that illustrate the key concepts and results of the proposed SEMG (GAI-based UAV Spectrum Estimation Map Generator) framework.

  1. Figure 1: This figure shows the roles of UAVs in communications and networking and compares Discriminative AI (DAI) and Generative AI (GAI) in solving UAV optimization problems. UAVs can act as aerial base stations, relays, and edge computing devices to address various communication and networking challenges. The figure also highlights the potential benefits of GAI over DAI in terms of problem understanding, channel sensing, resource allocation, and network deployment.
  2. Figure 2: This figure presents the framework of the proposed SEMG. It consists of two parts: Part A - The prompt optimizer generates professional prompts based on the user's task (e.g., constructing the objective function, network structure, and loss function of the diffusion model), and the Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is employed to output the results. Part B - The diffusion model generates the solution to the optimization problem. It involves four steps: obtaining the current state, generating the solution (e.g., SNR estimation) based on the state, computing the objective function value, and updating the diffusion model's networks based on the calculated loss.
  3. Figure 3: This figure demonstrates the experiment results of spectrum estimation using the SEMG framework. Part A shows the interaction between the user and the GAI agent for constructing the objective function, network structure, and loss function of the diffusion model. Part B presents the generation performance of the diffusion model, comparing it with LSTM. The results show that the diffusion model gradually understands the collected data during the training process and more accurately infers the SNR of the entire target area compared to LSTM.
  4. Figure 4: This figure illustrates the impact of the percentage of estimation energy on spectrum estimation difference and transmission rate. As the energy allocated to spectrum estimation by the UAV increases, the difference between the spectrum estimation map and the true map decreases. However, allocating more energy to spectrum estimation means less energy is available for data transmission, leading to a decrease in transmission rate. The proposed GDM-based method outperforms DDPG, demonstrating its suitability for resource-limited UAV systems.

These figures provide visual representations of the proposed SEMG framework, its components, and the performance evaluation results, helping readers better understand the effectiveness of GAI techniques in optimizing UAV communications and networking.

Data Links and Spectrum Useage

The article does not explicitly state the assumptions made about data link types and spectrum usage. However, based on the context and the case studies presented, we can infer some assumptions:

  1. Data link types:
    • The article does not specify the exact data link types used in the UAV communications and networking scenarios. However, it mentions that UAVs can act as aerial base stations, relays, and edge computing devices, which suggests that both air-to-ground and air-to-air communication links are considered.
    • The case studies focus on spectrum estimation and transmission rate optimization, implying that wireless communication links are used for data transmission between UAVs and ground stations or among UAVs.
  2. Spectrum usage:
    • The article emphasizes the importance of spectrum cartography and radio map construction for UAV communications and networking. This suggests that the UAVs operate in licensed or unlicensed frequency bands that require efficient spectrum utilization and management.
    • In the case studies, the UAV measures SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio) data in a portion of the target area, and the diffusion model generates a spectrum estimation map. This indicates that the UAVs are assumed to have the capability to sense and utilize the available spectrum for communication purposes.
    • The article also mentions the term "mmWave" (millimeter-wave) in the context of UAV communication, which suggests that high-frequency bands (e.g., 28 GHz, 60 GHz) might be considered for UAV communications to achieve high data rates and low latency.

However, it is important to note that these assumptions are not explicitly stated in the article, and the actual data link types and spectrum usage may vary depending on the specific UAV communication and networking scenarios considered. The article's focus is on the application of GAI techniques to optimize UAV communications and networking performance, rather than providing detailed information about the underlying communication technologies and spectrum regulations.

Authors

The article lists 8 authors affiliated with various institutions in China and Singapore:

1. Geng Sun: College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, China, and College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. IEEE

2. Wenwen Xie and Jing Wu: College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, China.

3. Dusit Niyato and Hongyang Du: College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

4. Jiawen Kang: School of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, China.

5. Sumei Sun: Institute for Infocomm Research, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore.

6. Ping Zhang: State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China.

The article cites several relevant studies:

- Reference [3]: G. Sun et al., "Secure and energy-efficient UAV relay communications exploiting collaborative beamforming," IEEE Trans. Commun., 2022. This work is co-authored by Geng Sun, one of the authors of the current article, and focuses on secure and energy-efficient UAV relay communications.

- Reference [5]: G. Sun et al., "Joint task offloading and resource allocation in aerial-terrestrial uav networks with edge and fog computing for post-disaster rescue," IEEE Trans. Mob. Compu., 2024. This work, also co-authored by Geng Sun, discusses task offloading and resource allocation in UAV networks for post-disaster rescue scenarios.

These previous works demonstrate the authors' expertise in UAV communications, networking, and resource allocation. However, the article does not provide an exhaustive list of all the authors' previous related work, as it focuses on the novel application of GAI techniques in UAV communications and networking optimization. 

Data, Simulations, and Artifacts

The article does not provide detailed information about specific databases used, simulations tested, or artifacts produced. However, based on the content of the article, we can infer the following:

Databases:

The article mentions that users can prepare fresh or proprietary data relevant to their needs, which is vectorized, indexed, and stored in a vector database (Section IV-B, Interaction Part). This suggests that the proposed SEMG framework may utilize a vector database to store and retrieve relevant data for generating appropriate strategies.

Simulations:

- The article presents two case studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed SEMG framework: UAV-enabled Spectrum Estimation (Section IV-C) and UAV-enabled Joint Spectrum Estimation and Rate Optimization (Section IV-D).

  • - In the first case study, the diffusion model is used to optimize the UAV's measurement trajectory and predict the spectrum map of the entire target area based on limited measurement information. The results show that the proposed SEMG framework outperforms LSTM in terms of spectrum estimation accuracy (Figure 3).
  • - In the second case study, the diffusion model generates the UAV exploitation trajectory to achieve accurate spectrum mapping and high transmission rates while considering energy constraints. The results demonstrate that the proposed GDM-based method outperforms DDPG in terms of spectrum estimation accuracy and transmission rate optimization (Figure 4).

- These case studies involve simulations to evaluate the performance of the proposed SEMG framework compared to other methods like LSTM and DDPG.

Artifacts:

  • - The article does not explicitly mention any specific artifacts produced during the research. However, the proposed SEMG framework itself can be considered an artifact, as it is a novel approach to optimizing UAV spectrum estimation and trajectory planning using GAI techniques.
  • - The case studies may have involved the development of software implementations of the proposed SEMG framework, diffusion models, and other comparative methods (e.g., LSTM, DDPG) for performance evaluation.

It is important to note that the article is focused on presenting the concept, framework, and potential applications of GAI techniques in UAV communications and networking optimization. As such, it does not provide detailed information about the specific databases, simulations, or artifacts used in the research. More information on these aspects might be available in the authors' other publications or future works based on this research.

Computer Science > Networking and Internet Architecture

Abstract: With the impressive achievements of chatGPT and Sora, generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has received increasing attention. Not limited to the field of content generation, GAI is also widely used to solve the problems in wireless communication scenarios due to its powerful learning and generalization capabilities. Therefore, we discuss key applications of GAI in improving unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) communication and networking performance in this article. Specifically, we first review the key technologies of GAI and the important roles of UAV networking. Then, we show how GAI can improve the communication, networking, and security performances of UAV systems. Subsequently, we propose a novel framework of GAI for advanced UAV networking, and then present a case study of UAV-enabled spectrum map estimation and transmission rate optimization based on the proposed framework to verify the effectiveness of GAI-enabled UAV systems. Finally, we discuss some important open directions.
Subjects: Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI); Signal Processing (eess.SP)
Cite as: arXiv:2404.10556 [cs.NI]
  (or arXiv:2404.10556v1 [cs.NI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.10556


Submission history

From: Wenwen Xie [view email]
[v1] Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:29:11 UTC (4,877 KB)

 

arxiv.org

Generative AI for Advanced UAV Networking


Geng Sun, Wenwen Xie, Dusit Niyato, , Hongyang Du, Jiawen Kang, Jing Wu,
Sumei Sun, , Ping Zhang
G. Sun is with the College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China, and also with the College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798 (e-mail: sungeng@jlu.edu.cn). W. Xie and and J. Wu are with the College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China (e-mail: xieww22@jlu.edu.cn, wujing@jlu.edu.cn) D. Niyato and H. Du are with the College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798 (e-mail: dniyato@ntu.edu.sg, hongyang001@e.ntu.edu.sg). J. Kang is with the School of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China (e-mail: kavinkang@gdut.edu.cn) S. Sun is with the Institute for Infocomm Research, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 639798 (e-mail: sunsm@i2r.a-star.edu.sg) P. Zhang is with the State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China (e-mail: pzhang@bupt.edu.cn).

Abstract

With the impressive achievements of chatGPT and Sora, generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has received increasing attention. Not limited to the field of content generation, GAI is also widely used to solve the problems in wireless communication scenarios due to its powerful learning and generalization capabilities. Therefore, we discuss key applications of GAI in improving unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) communication and networking performance in this article. Specifically, we first review the key technologies of GAI and the important roles of UAV networking. Then, we show how GAI can improve the communication, networking, and security performances of UAV systems. Subsequently, we propose a novel framework of GAI for advanced UAV networking, and then present a case study of UAV-enabled spectrum map estimation and transmission rate optimization based on the proposed framework to verify the effectiveness of GAI-enabled UAV systems. Finally, we discuss some important open directions.

Index Terms:

Generative AI, UAV communications and networking, optimization, UAV spectrum estimation, diffusion model.

I Introduction

From rule-based algorithms to advanced learning models, the tasks that artificial intelligence (AI) can solve have become increasingly complex, which makes it demonstrate enormous potential for solving problems in industry, business and everyday life. Traditional AI methods, such as discriminative AI (DAI) or predictive AI (PAI), can learn special paradigms from large-scale datasets to handle classification and prediction tasks by utilizing deep neural networks. Although these AI methods provide the foundation for modern data-driven environments and demonstrate good performance in handling dynamic demands, they still face several problems, e.g., it relies on widely annotated datasets.

Fortunately, the emergence of generative AI (GAI) has alleviated the limitations faced by DAI and PAI, marking a new stage in the AI development. Specifically, GAI can learn the probability distribution from training data instead of class boundaries, and then generate trustworthy new samples based on the learned distribution. Compared to traditional AI methods, the advantages of GAI can be summarized as follows:

  • Data Enhancement: GAI has the capability to generate new data based on the learned distribution. This process can expand the training set, which helps to enhance model generalization and address dataset scarcity.

  • Latent Space Representation: GAI can map the input data to the latent space during the training process, which contributes to learning the latent structure and features of the training samples. Note that this fine control is typically lacking in traditional AI methods.

  • Creativity: Given the powerful generative ability of GAI and its outstanding performance in unsupervised learning, GAI has the advantages in exploratory data analysis and new field applications.

Benefiting from the abovementioned advantages, the importance of GAI in complex task processing has gradually emerged. In particular, the great success of ChatGPT11 1https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/ and Sora22 2 https://openai.com/sora has ignited GAI research and spawned a multitude of applications including human-computer interaction, image processing, and video generation33 3 https://www.coursera.org/articles/generative-ai-applications.
It is worth noting that in addition to excelling in content creation, the strong generation and exploration capabilities give it an impressive potential for handling complex communication and networking optimization problems, such as antenna array optimization [1].

However, little research has been done on GAI for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) communications and networking. Currently, DAI, convex optimization, and game theory are commonly adopted for solving UAV optimization problems. However, these traditional methods may have limitations in dealing with the UAV networking problems due to the mobility of UAVs and the highly dynamic environments. Moreover, learning methods such as DAI may fail to capture the latent structure and features of the data, which results in incomplete understanding of the problem and weak ability to handle the unknown situations.

GAI shows great potential for solving the issues above. Specifically, the powerful learning and generalization capabilities demonstrated by GAI can be used to optimize resource management problems in UAV networks for improving the communication performance. For example, considering the limited resources of UAVs, GAI can accurately infer the condition of the overall target area based on the data collected from part of the target area, thereby making reasonable resource allocation and trajectory planning. Although integrating GAI into UAV communications and networking offers significant advantages, there are still some issues that need to be further discussed:

  • Q1: Why is GAI suitable for UAV communications and networking?

  • Q2: What UAV communication and networking issues can GAI handle?

  • Q3: How does GAI handle these issues?

Therefore, we provide a systematic tutorial to answer the above questions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to systematically demonstrate the adoption of GAI to solve UAV communication and networking optimization problems. Our contributions are summarized as follows:

  • We first introduce some specific technologies and applications of GAI. Subsequently, the roles and characteristics of the UAV are demonstrated. Finally, we illustrate the limitations of DAI and briefly present GAI for UAV communications and networking.

  • We discuss the potential of GAI to address UAV-related issues from the perspectives of communication, network, and security.

  • We propose a novel framework for UAV communications and networking leveraging GAI. Moreover, we construct a case study to demonstrate the effectiveness of GAI for enhancing UAV-enabled spectrum sensing and communication based on the proposed framework.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The roles of UAVs in communications and networking and the comparison of DAI and GAI in solving UAV optimization problem. Due to its maneuverability and computing power, the UAV can act as the aerial base station, relay and edge computing device to solve the communications and networking problems in various scenarios. Moreover, DAI and GAI are widely used to solve optimization problems in the aforementioned scenarios, where GAI stands out due to its powerful generation and learning capabilities.

II Overview of GAI and UAV Networking

In this section, we first introduce the key technologies and applications of GAI. Subsequently, the roles of UAV in networking are presented. Finally, we illustrate GAI on UAV in physical, network, and application layer.

II-A GAI and Applications

GAI is based on massive general-purpose knowledge obtained from large-scale training datasets, and it can perform tasks that meet the needs of the users. Moreover, it mainly relies on the following key AI technologies:

  • Large Language Model (LLM): LLM is trained based on a large amount of text data to learn various language patterns and structures for the purpose of understanding and generating natural language. Based on the excellent comprehension and inference generation capabilities, LLM is widely used in the fields of text generation and human-computer interaction, etc.

  • Transformer: Transformer is a sequence-to-sequence model with self-attention mechanism, which can simultaneously process information from various positions in the input sequence. Therefore, Transformer has achieved great success in natural language processing (NLP), such as machine translation and text summarization.

  • Generative Adversarial Network (GAN): GAN consists of a generator model and a discriminator model. Specifically, The former is responsible for generating similar data to the original data, while the latter is to determine the authenticity of the data. Therefore, GANs can generate complex and realistic data by training adversarial neural networks. Currently, GAN has a wide range applications in the fields of videos and network security, etc.

  • Variational Autoencoder (VAE): VAE is a generative model consisting of an encoder and a decoder. Specifically, the training process of VAE relies on a specific loss function that measures the difference between the reconstructed data and the original data, while considering the distribution characteristics of the latent space. Thus, VAE can learn the latent representation of the data and generate new data points similar to the training data, hence it has significant advantages in handling tasks such as signal processing and anomaly detection.

  • Generative Diffusion Model (GDM): GDM converts simple noise distributions into target data distributions through a series of reversible transformations. During the training process of the GDM, noise is gradually added to the original data, and then the inverse diffusion process is learned to construct the desired data samples from the noise. Due to the flexibility of the generation process and the high quality of the generated data, GDMs are often employed in the fields of image processing, data enhancement and recovery, and problem optimization, etc.

Currently, GAI methods, which adopts the abovementioned models, have spawned a large number of applications in various fields and achieved impressive results. Next, we will briefly introduce some GAI applications from the perspective of AI-Generated Content (AIGC) and AI-Generated Everything (AIGX).

  • AIGC: AIGC refers to generating contents that meet the needs of users by GAI, mainly including the generation of media content such as text, image, video and audio. For example, LLM-based chatGPT can interact with the users and generate relevant text content according to the prompts of users, such as translations, summaries, and writing articles.

  • AIGX: With the development of GAI, it has evolved to a new stage where GAI is employed to handle more complex problems in other domains and generate more complicated types of data, rather than being limited to media contents. Notably, GDM can be used in wireless network optimizations, such as maximizing the transmission rate, communication capacity, and energy efficiency.

The powerful problem understanding and processing capabilities that GAI have demonstrated in the abovementioned domains inspire us to apply it to solve the challenging UAV communication and networking optimization problems.

II-B UAV Communications and Networking

UAV communication and networking systems have received increasing attention from academia, and also have already achieved significant results in practical applications [2]. Specifically, several main roles of UAV systems in communication and networking domain are shown in Fig. 1, which can be detailed as follows.

  • Relay: UAVs can be utilized as mobile relay stations to connect the communication links between ground base stations and remote devices [3]. For example, in some special areas such as mountainous regions, where traditional base stations are difficult and costly to cover, UAVs can be assigned as relays to expand coverage and achieve long-distance transmission of signals.

  • Aerial Base Station: UAVs can be used as aerial base stations to provide stable and efficient communication services to ground users [4]. For example, UAVs can be used as temporary communication base stations in densely populated areas to enhance communication coverage and capacity to meet the peak communication needs.

  • Edge Computing: UAVs can act as edge computing devices to collect data from users for real-time analysis and processing [5]. For example, in intelligent traffic management, UAVs can analyze the current traffic conditions based on the obtained traffic flow statistics to make timely traffic control adjustments, which can alleviate traffic pressure.

  • Attack Detector: Given their versatility, UAVs can be utilized to assist in the prevention, detection, and recovery of attacks on 5G and 6G wireless networks.

The widespread applications of UAV communication and networking systems are inevitable due to their advantages over traditional terrestrial systems, which are summarized as follows.

  • Flexibility: Due to their high mobility and flexible deployment capability, UAVs can move quickly to specific areas to meet the communication requirements.

  • Adaptability: UAV can build temporary networks for some unexpected scenarios, supporting the temporary addition or withdrawal of UAV nodes while maintaining high availability.

  • High Cost-effectiveness: Compared to terrestrial fixed systems, UAVs can carry multiple devices for providing flexible and diverse services. Moreover, the cost of UAV systems is typically lower.

Note that due to the aforementioned advantages and wide range of applications, UAV communication and networking systems have been considered to play an important role in space-air-ground-sea integrated networks for 6G. Therefore, it is crucial to efficiently solve the problems faced by UAV communications and networking more efficiently.

II-C GAI for UAV Communications and Networking

Note that DAI methods have been widely used to solve the UAV communication and networking optimization problems. For example, artificial neural network is utilized to solve the channel behavior prediction problem of UAV communications, and support vector machine is employed to solve the problem of UAV-assisted resource allocation in ultra-dense networks. However, adopting DAI for UAV networking still faces the following limitations:

  • Data Dependency: DAI methods usually rely on extensively annotated datasets and requires a large amount of well-labeled data to learn the relationships between the data. However, in the field of UAV communications and networking, obtaining large amounts of well-labeled data is difficult. Specifically, the data is often noisy in the physical layer of UAV networks, which poses a challenge for some DAI models that are sensitive to noise and vulnerable to data incompleteness.

  • Weak Adaptability: DAI focuses more on patterns and features of known data, which leads to challenges when dealing with the unknown situations. In particular, the environments faced by the network layer of UAVs are often highly dynamic, hence DAI may struggle to provide flexible solutions.

  • Insufficient Modeling Capabilities: DAI focuses on learning the features of data, with limited understanding of the data generation process. Thus, DAI methods are more suitable for modeling clear and simple problems. For the application layer of UAV networks, which usually involves multiple resources constraints, the data is typically large and complex. In this case, DAI may not be able to fully understand the information carried by the data for accurate modeling.

The limitations faced by DAI methods in solving the UAV communication and networking problems lead to the emergence of GAI. In the following, we show services that GAI can provide to UAVs from three perspectives, namely, the physical layer, network layer, and application layer. Moreover, we analyze the differences between UAV systems and other wireless systems in these services.

II-C1 Physical Layer

Compared to terrestrial communication systems, the highly dynamic and flexible nature of UAV networks makes the channel characteristics more complex. Therefore, the channel estimation requires to consider the changes of flight state in real-time for the purpose of maintaining a stable and efficient communication connection. In such cases, GAI with VAE model [6] can improve the performance of UAV communications by generating more accurate channel parameters according to the predicted link state.

II-C2 Network Layer

In traditional terrestrial systems, the positions of nodes are typically fixed and the communication paths are relatively stable. In contrast, due to the mobility of UAVs, the network topology of UAV systems is more flexible and dynamic. In this case, GAI can generate adaptive network topology management schemes in real-time to adapt to different communication scenarios according to task requirements. For example, WaveGAN method [7] is proposed to optimize the network topology in the integration of dynamic flying ad-hoc networks.

II-C3 Application Layer

The diverse mission requirements and real-time data processing capabilities of the UAV at the application layer make it significantly different from other wireless systems. Moreover, due to the resource-constrained nature of UAVs, higher demands are placed on the process of resource allocation, and trade-off between multi-objectives, etc. In this instance, GAI can generate intelligent resource allocation and task scheduling solutions according to the real-time demand of the current missions and environment changes, which can ensure various performances of the UAV systems. Specifically, a typical example is a GAN-based method [8] to minimize the energy consumption of UAVs and task latency of ground users.

TABLE I: The Use of GAI in UAV Communications and Networking.


Issues Models

Generative AI Model Analysis

LLM

Transformer

GAN

VAE

GDM

Iteractive Strategy Optimization

Learn historical relevant data [9]

Potential benefits: (1) More comprehensive problem understanding ability (2) More powerful channel sensing capability (3) More intelligent resource allocation and more rational network deployment

Adaptive Modulation and Channel Sensing

Predict future channels in parallel

Train a stand-alone channel model

Generate parameters related to channel [6]

Communication Resource Allocation and Optimization

Provide an approximation of the distributions of UAVs [8]

Assign tasks to edge computing servers

Resource allocation strategy generation

Route Design

Plan UAV cluster routing

Learn the routing policy [10]

Generate the routing strategies based on environment changes

Potential benefits: (1) Better routing policies for dynamic UAV environment (2) More rational UAV network topology for better performance (3) Improve the accuracy of network configuration

Network Topology Design

Plan long-term trajectory

Generate optimized network topology from supervised dataset [7]

Network Configuration Optimization

Analyze network traffic

Generate the effective contracts for mobile AIGC services [11]

Physical Layer Security

Predict the ideal serving beam for UAVs

Approximate mmWave channel distributions

Provide robust data transmission

Optimize beamforming and signal DoA estimation [1]

Potential benefits: (1) Optimize UAV beamforming (2) Improve the accuracy of network configuration (3) Enhance privacy protection capability in a novel way

Anomaly Detection

Detect the unknown anomalies and locate them [12]

Detect UAV faults and anomalies

Detect network intrusion

Privacy Preservation

Generate training samples [13]

III GAI-enhanced Technologies in UAV Communications and Networking

In this section, we show how GAI addresses the optimization problems from UAV communication, network and security perspectives, which are summarized in Table I.

III-A From Communication Perspective

III-A1 Interactive strategy optimization

Proper scenario simulations and correct problem formulations are cornerstones for optimizing the performance of the UAV communication and networking systems. Thus, from the design perspective, GAI can be adopted to enrich the UAV application scenarios and optimize the formulations to reduce the impact of human factors through interactive response. For example, in [9], the authors propose a problem formulation framework based on LLM and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) for a wireless communication scenario. Specifically, the users provide some detailed information that are related to the scenario (e.g., structure and optimization objectives) for the purpose of requiring the problem formulation. Then, the GAI agent generates the corresponding problem formulation according to the prompts of users and the knowledge database which contains some relevant extra information. The experiment results show that the problem formulation performance obtained by GAI generation outperforms manual modeling, which means that LLM with strong comprehension ability can generate accurate optimization problems through interactive processes.

III-A2 Adaptive Modulation and Channel Sensing

UAVs typically perform missions in highly dynamic and constantly changing environments, which results in the methods of energy detection and cyclic detection commonly used in terrestrial-based systems being less applicable to UAV systems. In this case, we can employ GAI to analyze the collected environmental data in real-time to build channel model and adaptive modulation. For example, VAE can be used for channel sensing and modeling [6]. Specifically, the state of the communication link is first predicted, which is subsequently input into the VAE to generate channel-related parameters such as path loss, delay, angle of arrival and angle of departure. The experiment results demonstrate this generative model outperforms standard 3GPP channel model. This demonstrates that VAE is able to capture complex statistical relationships, which is not possible in standard parametric models.

III-A3 Communication Resource Allocation and Optimization

UAV communication systems require rational allocation of limited communication resources to meet the needs of different scenarios. In this context, GAI can flexibly and intelligently adjust the allocation of resources to maximize the efficiency and quality of tasks based on the real-time demands of the tasks and network conditions. For example, in [8], The authors propose a task offloading and trajectory optimization strategy based on GAN. Specifically, the energy consumption of the UAV and the task latency of the ground user are minimized by optimizing the flight trajectory, task assignment and offloading ratio. Numerical results show that this method outperforms other benchmark algorithms.

III-B From Network Perspective

III-B1 Route Design

The routing design of UAV networks is required to consider the factors of UAV mobility and environment dynamism, which suggests that more flexible routing algorithms and mechanisms should be adopted. We can use GAI to monitor network status and communication quality to adjust routing and forwarding policies in real-time. For example, a GAN-based method [10] is proposed to decide the route strategy of UAV networks. Specifically, GAN is used to learn expert routing policies and combined with inverse reinforcement learning to select routes with minimum end-to-end delay based on persistent network conditions. Compared to the state-of-the-art routing protocols, this method presents outstanding performance in terms of end-to-end delay and package delivery ratio.

III-B2 Network Topology Design

Due to the mobility of UAVs, the network topology is a lot more dynamic than the terrestrial communication systems. Additionally, UAV systems typically have the capability to form ad-hoc networks to support temporary communications. Therefore, intelligent network topology design is crucial for UAV systems, which contributes to improving the network performance, especially in some emergency scenarios. In this case, we can use GAI to optimize the UAV network layout and connectivity. For example, in [7], the authors propose a GAN-based topology optimization method to maximize the network throughput in the UAV dynamic flying ad-hoc networks. In this method, GAN is adopted to learn how to generate optimized network topologies from a supervised dataset. Simulation results show that this method can find the network topology quickly, and the observed gap with the optimal topology is small in networks of different sizes.

III-B3 Network Configuration Optimization

The task requirements of UAV systems have become more varied and complex, which means that UAV networks demand more intelligent and customized designs. However, traditional rule-based solutions rely on human effort and expertise, which makes them more susceptible to the human factor. In this case, GAI can be adapted to create special network designs and mechanisms according to different objectives and scenarios. For example, in [14], the authors propose a novel network structure called AI-Generated Network (AIGN) to generate customized network solutions to adapt to dynamically time varying environments. Moreover, the authors analyze its appealing properties, including the interpretability for intent-driven configuration.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The framework of the proposed SEMG. In part A, the prompt optimizer generates professional prompts based on the task of users (in our case study for constructing the objective function, the network structure and loss function of the diffusion model), and subsequently the RAG is employed to output the results. In part B, the diffusion model is used to generate the solution to the optimization problem. Specifically, in Step 1, the current state is obtained. In Step 2, the diffusion model generates the solution based on the state, i.e., the SNR estimation. In Step 3, the objective function value is computed based on the observed state and the generated solution. In Step 4, the loss of the diffusion model network is calculated based on the objective function value and the network is updated.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The experiment result of spectrum estimation. Part A shows the interaction between the user and GAI agent for the purpose of constructing the objective function, the network structure and loss function of diffusion model. Part B demonstrates the generation performance of diffusion model. (a) the true SNR map. (b) the process of generating SNR estimation map by our proposed SEMG. (c) the process of generating SNR estimation map by LSTM. (d) the difference between the measurements and estimations.

III-C From Security Perspective

Compared to traditional fixed terrestrial systems, the sensors and cameras carried by UAV systems may collect large amounts of sensitive data, such as flight paths and images, posing risks of privacy and information leakage during data transmission. Additionally, their high dynamicity and the broadcast nature of wireless communication increase the risks of signal variations and communication interference. Furthermore, due to resource constraints, conventional security defense measures are not applicable, which motives the tailor-made efficient security solutions for UAV systems.

III-C1 Physical Layer Security

Physical layer security which employs the natural randomness and complexity of the wireless channel is an effective and promising method to avoid eavesdroppers in UAV communications for improving the security. Beamforming or collaborative beamforming is one of the more widely used techniques in the field of UAV physical layer security. In this case, GAI can provide an optimized solution for beamforming by learning the relationship between different UAV antenna configurations and beamforming parameters. For example, the authors of [1] propose a diffusion model-based method that efficiently estimates the direction of signal arrival under near-field conditions when the antenna spacing is more than half the wavelength. Thus, we may be inspired by this work to use GDM models to optimize beamforming vectors for UAV swarms to improve communication performance.

III-C2 Anomaly Detection

UAVs are often subject to malicious nodes attacks since they are usually deployed in open environments. Therefore, network intrusion detection is essential to ensure that UAVs can safely accomplish the mission. Since GAI has strong pattern recognition and learning capabilities, it can be used to design schemes for identifying malicious nodes to secure the system. For example, in [12], a collaborative intrusion detection algorithm based on conditional GAN (CGAN) is proposed, in which Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) is introduced into CGAN training to improve the feature extraction ability of the network. Specifically, the data generated by CGAN is used as enhanced data for intrusion detection and classification. Compared to other models such as support vector machine, random forest and recurrent neural network, this method performs well in intrusion detection.

III-C3 Privacy Preservation

UAVs may be assigned to special tasks, e.g., sensitive data transmission. In this case, GAI can be used to protect sensitive data transmitted or shared within UAV networks from unauthorized access or surveillance. For example, a distributed GAN framwork is proposed in [13] to cooperatively model the mmWave channel for the purpose of sharing channel data in a communication-efficient and privacy-preserving approach within the UAV network. Specifically, the GAN framework trains a model to produce channel samples based on the underlying distribution of its dataset, while maintaining the confidentiality of the data distribution and without showcasing real data samples explicitly.

IV Case Study: GAI for UAV Spectrum Map Estimation

In this section, we first propose a novel framework for GAI on UAV spectrum estimation. We then introduce two case studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Specifically, the first case uses GAI to construct the spectrum estimation map based on the measurement information collected by the UAV, and the second case adopts GAI to optimize the trajectory of UAV. It is worth noting that the two case studies are interrelated and can complement each other. On one hand, the spectrum estimation map can be used by GAI to better optimize the UAV trajectory to achieve optimal transmission performance. On the other hand, the UAV can consider trajectories that can effectively collect more information to estimate spectrum accurately. The performance evaluation demonstrates this symbiotic relation between the spectrum map estimation and UAV trajectory optimization clearly.

IV-A Motivation

Spectrum cartography consists of a collection of techniques used to construct and maintain radio maps that provide useful information about radio-frequency (RF) landscape, such as received signal power and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). As such, radio maps play an important role in solving complex tasks, such as resource allocation and mission planning. To collect the necessary measurements for building the radio maps, traditionally, technicians in a vehicle with measurement equipment would drive around the site over the past decades. With advances in mobile robotics, it is now possible to use UAVs with on-board sensors to collect the required measurement data, which is clearly more efficient in terms of time and labor costs [15].

IV-B Proposed Design

Utilizing data collected by UAVs for spectrum estimation and creating spectrum maps usually requires a deep understanding of wireless networks and complex professional methods. Fortunately, GAI offers a promising solution to this daunting task. Specifically, given its powerful inference capabilities, the diffusion model can be used to infer the spectrum of target area based on the data collected by the UAV, which lays the foundation for subsequent execution of more complex tasks. Note that components such as the network structure and loss design of diffusion models have a crucial impact on their optimization performance. However, manual formulation is challenging, especially for newcomers. LLM and RAG techniques can be adopted to address this issue, which can efficiently assist the users in completing the task, and significantly reduce the impact of human error. Therefore, as shown in Fig. 2, we propose a GAI-based UAV spectrum estimation map generator (SEMG), which contains the following components:

  • Interaction Part: In the input layer, users (e.g., UAV operators) provide GAI with raw prompts based on task requirements, including text, images, audio and video, etc. Then, prompt engineering is adopted to optimize the prompts, which enables a better mapping of the downstream tasks to the tasks solved by the pre-training process of the GAI agent. In the decision layer, considering that GAI cannot access real-time or non-public datasets, users can prepare some fresh or proprietary data which is relevant to their needs. Note that the prepared data above will be vectorized, indexed and stored in the vector database. Subsequently, the framework retrieves the vector database based on the query of the user and selects the N data entries with the highest relevance. After that, the selected data that is regarded as the background context is integrated with the query to form the prompts, which can better guide the LLM to generate appropriate strategies that meet the requirement of users.

  • Generation Part: First, the current state of the environment is observed. Subsequently, the diffusion model predicts noise and generates solution based on the observed state. Finally, the objective value is calculated and the networks of diffusion model are updated according to the objective function and loss function designed by LLM in the interaction part, respectively. After training, the diffusion model can generate the corresponding spectrum estimation map based on the collected data by UAV via trained denoising network.

Next, We design two case studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed SEMG framework.

IV-C Case 1: UAV-enabled Spectrum Estimation

IV-C1 Scenario Description

The UAV is dispatched to measure SNR data in a portion of the target area. Then, the diffusion model is adopted to optimize the measurement trajectory of the UAV to more accurately predict the spectrum map of the entire target area based on limited measurement information.

IV-C2 Performance Analysis

The interaction between the user and GAI agent is presented in Part A of Fig. 3. As can be seen, the user intends to design the network structure and loss function of the diffusion model. Traditionally, network designers need to consult a large number of papers in order to design a reasonable model. In our proposed framework, this can be achieved automatically through the interaction between the user and the GAI agent. Note that the resulting network design perfectly aligns with the ground truth.

Based on the network structure and loss function designed by GAI, we can adopt diffusion model to generate spectrum estimation. Fig. 3(a) presents the true SNR map. Moreover, Fig. 3(b) and Fig. 3(c) shows the process of generating SNR estimation map by our proposed SEMG and LSTM, respectively. Compared to the spectrum map generated by LSTM, the diffusion model can gradually understand the meaning of the collected data during the training process and more accurately infer the SNR of the whole target area. In addition, Fig. 3(d) shows the estimation difference of our proposed SEMG and LSTM, where the decreasing curve shows that the gap between the estimation and measurement values decreases as the number of training episodes increases. It is obvious that our proposed SEMG outperforms LSTM. Therefore, the abovementioned results demonstrate the effectiveness of SEMG in UAV-enabled spectrum estimation.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: The impact of percentage of estimation energy on spectrum estimation difference and transmission rate.

IV-D Case 2: UAV-enabled Joint Spectrum Estimation and Rate Optimization

IV-D1 Scenario Description

In this scenario, the UAV acts as both spectrum estimator and data transmitter, and we aim to use diffusion model to generate the UAV exploitation trajectory for jointly achieving accurate spectrum map and high transmission rate. Considering the energy constrained nature of UAV, the impact of energy consumption on spectrum estimation and transmission performance is necessary to explore.

IV-D2 Performance Analysis

Fig. 4 shows the impact of percentage of estimation energy consumption on spectrum estimation accuracy and transmission performance. As the energy allocated to spectrum estimation by UAV increases, the difference between the spectrum estimation map and true map gradually decreases. This is because more energy of UAV is allocated to spectrum detection will lead to the UAV collecting more information for making the spectrum map accurately. However, UAVs are energy-constrained aerial platforms, and allocating more energy for spectrum estimation means less energy are available for data transmission. Therefore, the curve of transmission rate shows a decrease tend when the energy allocated to spectrum estimation increases. It is worth noting that the quality of spectrum estimation also affects data transmission. This is because when the energy allocated to spectrum estimation is too low, the poor quality of spectrum estimation map affects the optimization data transmission rate. Note that our proposed GDM-based method outperforms DDPG, which means that it is especially suitable for the resource-limited UAV systems.

V Future Directions

In this section, we will introduce three future directions for GAI on UAV communications and networks.

V-A Energy-Efficient GAI on UAVs

The inference of GAI involves complex computational processes, making it resource-intensive, particularly for energy-constrained platforms such as UAVs. Therefore, incorporating the operating costs of GAI into UAV systems is a crucial direction to ensure efficient utilization of resources for achieving optimal performance.

V-B Secure GAI on UAV

The UAV wireless communications pose various attack threats due to the open channel. Although beamforming can resist eavesdropping attacks, it is powerless against data tampering by attackers. Therefore, blockchain-based data platforms are worth investigating in order to protect the data of GAI.

V-C Multimodal Processing on UAV

The recent success of Sora has sparked a surge in video generation technologies. It is worth noting that UAVs are extensively utilized in high-altitude video capture applications. Consequently, leveraging GAI for real-time processing of UAV videos to produce special effects or enhance quality emerges as a compelling research avenue.

VI Conclusion

In this article, we systematically introduce how GAI optimizes the UAV communications and networking. Specifically, we first introduce the fundamentals of GAI and the multiple roles of UAVs. Then, we discuss GAI on UAV from three perspectives of communication, network, and security. Subsequently, we propose a novel framework of GAI for UAV communications and networking, and then conduct a case study on UAV-enabled spectrum map estimation and transmission rate optimization to validate the effectiveness of the proposed GAI framework. Finally, three key future directions are shown that can further improve GAI on UAV systems. We hope that this article can inspire researchers to propose more GAI methods in wireless network areas such as UAV networks.

References

  • [1] J. Wang, H. Du, D. Niyato, J. Kang, S. Cui, X. Shen, and P. Zhang, “Generative AI for integrated sensing and communication: Insights from the physical layer perspective,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01036, 2023.
  • [2] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, Y. Nam, and M. Debbah, “A tutorial on UAVs for wireless networks: Applications, challenges, and open problems,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2334–2360, 2019.
  • [3] G. Sun, J. Li, A. Wang, Q. Wu, Z. Sun, and Y. Liu, “Secure and energy-efficient UAV relay communications exploiting collaborative beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 5401–5416, 2022.
  • [4] Q. Zhang, W. Saad, M. Bennis, X. Lu, M. Debbah, and W. Zuo, “Predictive deployment of UAV base stations in wireless networks: Machine learning meets contract theory,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 637–652, 2021.
  • [5] G. Sun, L. He, Z. Sun, Q. Wu, S. Liang, J. Li, D. Niyato, and V. C. M. Leung, “Joint task offloading and resource allocation in aerial-terrestrial uav networks with edge and fog computing for post-disaster rescue,” IEEE Trans. Mob. Compu., pp. 1–18, 2024.
  • [6] W. Xia, S. Rangan, M. Mezzavilla, A. Lozano, G. Geraci, V. Semkin, and G. Loianno, “Generative neural network channel modeling for millimeter-wave UAV communication,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 9417–9431, 2022.
  • [7] E. Odat, H. Ghazzai, and A. Alsharoa, “A WaveGAN approach for mmWave-based FANET topology optimization,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 6, 2024.
  • [8] Y. Li, L. Feng, Y. Yang, and W. Li, “GAN-powered heterogeneous multi-agent reinforcement learning for UAV-assisted task offloading,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 153, p. 103341, 2024.
  • [9] R. Zhang, H. Du, Y. Liu, D. Niyato, J. Kang, S. Sun, X. Shen, and H. V. Poor, “Interactive AI with retrieval-augmented generation for next generation networking,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.11391, 2024.
  • [10] J. Liu, Q. Wang, and Y. Xu, “AR-GAIL: Adaptive routing protocol for FANETs using generative adversarial imitation learning,” Computer Networks, vol. 218, p. 109382, 2022.
  • [11] Y. Liu, H. Du, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, D. I. Kim, and A. Jamalipour, “Deep generative model and its applications in efficient wireless network management: A tutorial and case study,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17114, 2023.
  • [12] X. He, Q. Chen, L. Tang, W. Wang, and T. Liu, “CGAN-based collaborative intrusion detection for UAV networks: A blockchain-empowered distributed federated learning approach,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 120–132, 2022.
  • [13] Q. Zhang, A. Ferdowsi, and W. Saad, “Distributed generative adversarial networks for mmwave channel modeling in wireless UAV networks,” in IEEE ICC, 2021, pp. 1–6.
  • [14] Y. Huang, M. Xu, X. Zhang, D. Niyato, Z. Xiong, S. Wang, and T. Huang, “AI-generated network design: A diffusion model-based learning approach,” IEEE Network, 2023.
  • [15] S. Zhang and R. Zhang, “Radio map-based 3D path planning for cellular-connected UAV,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1975–1989, 2021.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Space-Air-Ground Integrated Wireless Networks for 6G: Basics, Key Technologies, and Future Trends | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Multiple Integrated SAGINs An International Team of Scientists Outline Vision for Space-Air-Ground Integration in 6G Networks A comprehensi...