Muon-Catalyzed Fusion: Recent Advances and Power Generation Potential

Muon Catalyzed Fusion Brings Practical Nuclear Fusion Power Closer

Breakthrough: Startup Demonstrates 28 Hours of Continuous Muon-Catalyzed Fusion

By Science Technology Reporter
May 1, 2025

In a significant advancement for clean energy technology, Cambridge-based startup Acceleron Fusion has achieved a remarkable milestone in the field of cold fusion, demonstrating 28 hours of continuous fusion using a novel muon-catalyzed approach that operates at temperatures below 1,000 degrees Celsius.

The company recently closed a $24 million Series A funding round co-led by Lowercarbon Capital and Collaborative Fund to advance its unique approach to clean, safe, and abundant energy.

A Cooler Approach to Fusion

While most fusion approaches require plasma heated to temperatures of 100 million degrees Celsius, Acceleron's technology takes a fundamentally different approach. Their reactor uses muons—subatomic particles 200 times more massive than electrons—to catalyze fusion at temperatures below 1,000°C, eliminating the need for complex plasma containment systems.

"It adds a great amount of technical simplicity and engineering flexibility," said Ara Knaian, Acceleron's CEO and co-founder. "By sidestepping the extreme heat requirements of conventional fusion, we're opening a new pathway to practical fusion energy."

The Science Behind Muon-Catalyzed Fusion

The scientific principle behind Acceleron's approach has been known since the 1950s, when Nobel laureate Luis Alvarez first discovered muon-catalyzed fusion. This process involves replacing electrons in hydrogen atoms with muons, which are about 200 times heavier. This replacement brings the nuclei of hydrogen isotopes much closer together, enabling fusion to occur at dramatically lower temperatures.

The key challenge has been making the process energy-positive. Each muon only lasts about 2.2 microseconds before decaying, and while that's enough time to facilitate approximately 100 fusion reactions, it has historically been insufficient for commercial power generation.

Recent Breakthrough

In October 2024, Acceleron achieved a significant technical milestone that has attracted substantial investor attention. The company successfully operated its experimental fusion reactor with highly compressed deuterium-tritium fuel for 28 continuous hours, following over 100 hours of testing with deuterium alone.

This extended run represents one of the longest continuous demonstrations of muon-catalyzed fusion to date, and suggests that Acceleron's innovations in high-pressure fuel compression and muon production efficiency are yielding promising results.

Technology Innovations

Acceleron's approach involves several key technical innovations:

1. An improved muon source that produces particles with significantly less energy than conventional methods, leveraging improvements in accelerator efficiency that has jumped from around 20% in the 1980s to 50% today.

2. A high-density fusion cell that compresses fuel in a diamond anvil to pressures between 10,000 and 100,000 PSI—far beyond the pressures used in previous experiments—potentially allowing each muon to catalyze more fusion reactions.

3. Advanced computer simulations and materials science innovations that optimize the entire fusion process.

Key Problems That Must Be Solved

Despite the promising progress, several fundamental challenges remain before muon-catalyzed fusion can become a commercial reality:

1. Alpha Sticking Problem: In approximately 0.8% of fusion reactions, muons become "stuck" to alpha particles produced during the reaction, removing them from the catalytic cycle. This significantly limits the number of reactions each muon can catalyze. Acceleron is investigating whether their high-pressure approach can reduce this sticking rate.

2. Energy-Efficient Muon Production: Creating muons traditionally requires enormous energy input. According to Knaian, Acceleron is designing a novel muon source to produce particles with substantially less energy than conventional methods. The company needs to demonstrate that their approach can generate muons at an energy cost that allows for net-positive power production.

3. Fusion Reaction Rate: To achieve commercial viability, each muon must catalyze significantly more than the current ~100 fusion reactions before it decays. Engineers are exploring ways to increase the density and pressure of the fuel to accelerate reaction rates.

4. Scaling to Power-Plant Levels: To be commercially viable, a fusion reactor must produce approximately five times more energy than it consumes. Scaling Acceleron's experimental setup to continuously generate commercially significant power output remains a major engineering challenge.

5. Heat Capture and Conversion: Converting the energy from fusion reactions to usable electricity at high efficiency is another hurdle that will need to be overcome as the technology advances toward commercialization.

From Research to Commercialization

The company's journey from research to potential commercialization has been swift. Acceleron was launched after receiving a $2 million ARPA-E grant in 2020 to study whether higher pressure could enhance the effectiveness of muon-catalyzed fusion, followed by additional grant funding in 2023.

The company's team is currently using the High Intensity Proton Accelerator and Swiss Muon Source at the Paul Scherrer Institute in Switzerland for their experiments.

Industry Impact

Energy experts see Acceleron's work as part of a broader renaissance in fusion research and investment. If successful, Acceleron's approach could lead to an energy revolution with far-reaching implications for addressing climate change and global energy security.

"Muon-catalyzed fusion could redefine clean energy by creating an abundant, sustainable power source," said Sophie Bakalar, Partner at Collaborative Fund, one of Acceleron's investors.

Challenges Ahead

Despite the promising advances, significant hurdles remain. Dennis Whyte, a professor at MIT, notes that muon-catalyzed fusion is still "energy balance negative" on paper. To be commercially viable, a fusion reactor must produce approximately five times more energy than it consumes.

The company is focusing on two key challenges: increasing the efficiency of muon production and reducing the rate at which muons stick to alpha particles produced during fusion.

Looking Forward

Acceleron envisions a future where their technology could enable relatively small (100 MW) power plants, potentially allowing for the conversion of numerous fossil fuel-based facilities to clean fusion energy.

As the world grapples with increasing energy demands, particularly from AI computing and electrification, the need for clean, scalable energy solutions has never been more urgent. Muon-catalyzed fusion represents one of the most innovative approaches in the diverse landscape of fusion technologies being pursued today.

With its recent funding and technical achievements, Acceleron is positioned to accelerate development of what could become a transformative energy technology in the coming decade.

Muon-Catalyzed Fusion: Recent Advances and Power Generation Potential

Introduction

Muon-catalyzed fusion (μCF or MCF) represents a unique approach to nuclear fusion that operates at temperatures significantly lower than conventional thermonuclear fusion methods. Unlike traditional fusion approaches that require plasma temperatures of around 100 million degrees Celsius, muon-catalyzed fusion can occur at temperatures as low as room temperature or below, making it one of the few known methods for catalyzing nuclear fusion at such low energies. This article explores the fundamental principles of muon-catalyzed fusion, recent research breakthroughs, and its potential as a viable energy source.

The quest for sustainable fusion energy has led researchers to explore various pathways beyond mainstream approaches like magnetic confinement (tokamaks) and inertial confinement fusion. Muon-catalyzed fusion offers a fundamentally different approach that circumvents the extreme temperature requirements of traditional methods, potentially simplifying reactor design while still harnessing the clean energy potential of fusion reactions.

Recent commercial developments, particularly by Acceleron Fusion, and continued academic research have revitalized interest in this field, suggesting that technological advances may finally be overcoming hurdles that have limited μCF's practical application for energy generation since its theoretical prediction in the 1950s.

Fundamental Principles

The Muon Catalyst

Muons belong to the same family of subatomic particles as electrons but are approximately 207 times heavier. They occur naturally when cosmic rays hit Earth's upper atmosphere, but can also be generated artificially by firing an ion beam from a particle accelerator into a target, typically made of carbon or metal.

The key to muon-catalyzed fusion lies in the muon's ability to replace electrons in hydrogen isotope molecules. When a muon replaces an electron in a hydrogen molecule, it brings the nuclei much closer together due to its greater mass. This replacement shortens the distance between nuclei, bringing them close enough for the strong nuclear force to pull them together, ultimately causing the atoms to fuse and release energy.

Figure 1: Principle of muon-catalyzed fusion. The muon (207 times heavier than the electron) reduces the distance between nuclei, allowing quantum tunneling through the Coulomb barrier. (Source: Holmlid, L. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 2022)

Nuclear fusion reactions take place when two nuclei such as deuterium and tritium approach one another to within the range of the nuclear interaction (approximately a few times 10⁻¹³ cm). However, the Coulomb repulsion between positively charged nuclei increases with decreasing distance, making nuclear fusion difficult to achieve. In conventional fusion approaches, this is overcome with extreme heat (temperatures of millions of degrees), but muons provide an alternative pathway.

Fusion Cycle

In the typical deuterium-tritium (D-T) fusion cycle, the process begins when a negative muon is captured by a deuterium or tritium atom, forming a muonic atom. The electrically neutral muonic tritium atom acts somewhat like a "fatter, heavier neutron," and can form a muonic molecular ion within a deuterium molecule, with the muonic molecular ion acting as a "fatter, heavier nucleus." Once formed, the muon shields the positive charges of the deuteron and triton from each other, allowing them to tunnel through the Coulomb barrier in approximately a nanosecond.

The complete muon-catalyzed D-T fusion cycle includes several steps:

1. Muon capture by deuterium or tritium atoms
2. Formation of muonic atoms (dμ or tμ)
3. Transfer of the muon from deuterium to tritium (due to energy advantage)
4. Formation of muonic molecular ions ((dtμ)⁺)
5. Nuclear fusion within the muonic molecule
6. Release of the muon to repeat the cycle

Figure 2: Illustration of the muon-catalyzed fusion reaction cycle, showing the steps from muon capture through fusion and muon recycling. (Source: Dinh et al., AIP Conference Proceedings, 2020)

When fusion occurs, the muon is typically released and becomes available to catalyze additional fusion reactions. However, in approximately 1% of cases, the muon sticks to the alpha particle produced in the nuclear reaction, removing it from the catalytic cycle—a phenomenon known as "alpha sticking," which has been a significant limitation to the efficiency of the fusion chain.

Historical Development

The phenomenon of muon-catalyzed fusion was first predicted on theoretical grounds by Soviet physicist Andrei Sakharov and British physicist Sir Frederick Frank in the 1940s. Soviet physicist Yakov Borisovich Zeldovich further discussed it in 1954, and Canadian-American physicist John David Jackson published one of the first comprehensive theoretical studies in 1957.

Nobel prize winner and Manhattan Project alumnus Luis Alvarez discovered muon-catalyzed fusion experimentally in the 1950s. The field experienced renewed interest in the 1970s and 1980s when several research groups worldwide demonstrated that a single muon could catalyze over 100 fusion reactions.

The timeline of key developments includes:

• 1947: F.C. Frank theoretically predicts the possibility of muon-catalyzed fusion
• 1954: Ya.B. Zeldovich provides theoretical framework for μCF
• 1956: Luis Alvarez observes muon-catalyzed p-d fusion at Berkeley
• 1957: J.D. Jackson publishes comprehensive theoretical study, identifying alpha sticking as a key challenge
• 1967: E.A. Vesman predicts resonant formation of muonic molecular ions
• 1970s-1980s: Research intensifies with experiments at LAMPF (Los Alamos) and PSI (Switzerland)
• 1986: S.E. Jones et al. demonstrate significantly higher fusion yields (>100 per muon)
• 2020s: Acceleron Fusion applies modern technology to develop commercially viable μCF

Recent Research Advances

Acceleron Fusion's Breakthroughs

The most significant recent development in muon-catalyzed fusion comes from Acceleron Fusion, a Cambridge, Massachusetts-based startup. In late 2024, Acceleron secured $24 million in Series A funding to advance its unique approach to muon-catalyzed fusion energy. The company achieved a significant technical milestone in October 2024 by running its machine with highly compressed deuterium-tritium fuel, capturing data on 28 hours of continuous fusion after more than 100 hours of testing with deuterium.

Acceleron's founders believe that advances in accelerator technology, high-strength materials, and computational simulation codes over the past 30 years have greatly improved the feasibility of designing and building a muon-catalyzed fusion plant. They have been working with leading physics researchers and labs including the Paul Scherrer Institute, Fermilab, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Argonne National Laboratory.

Figure 3: Acceleron's high-density fusion cell containing a millimeter-scale sample of highly compressed deuterium-tritium that undergoes muon-catalyzed fusion. (Source: Ara Knaian/Acceleron Fusion, IEEE Spectrum, 2025)

Technical Innovations

Several key technical innovations are driving progress in the field:

1. Improved Muon Sources: Acceleron is developing efficient muon generators that aim to reduce energy costs significantly compared to traditional muon production methods. This includes leveraging improvements in accelerator efficiency, which has jumped from around 20% in the 1980s to 50% today, with the U.S. Department of Energy targeting 75% for next-generation accelerators. Research from Kelly et al. (2021) shows that optimizing beam energy and target materials can significantly reduce the energy cost of muon production.

2. High-Pressure Fusion: Using diamond anvils to compress fuel to pressures of up to 100,000 PSI significantly increases reaction rates. Acceleron's approach hopes to reduce the rate at which muons stick to alpha particles by raising the pressure of the hydrogen isotope mix, potentially allowing each muon to catalyze more fusion reactions.

3. Simulation-Driven Design: Advanced computer models are being employed to optimize energy efficiency and muon utilization. The company is leveraging recent advances in materials science, computer simulation, and machine learning to develop the technology to the level of efficiency needed for energy production.

4. In-Flight Muon Catalyzed Fusion (IFMCF): Research has explored non-resonant In-flight Muon Catalyzed Fusion, calculating the muonic atom-nucleus collision cross-section with improved precision within the optical model for nuclear reactions. This approach focuses on using hot muonic atoms that undergo fusion before thermalization.

Figure 4: Comparison between conventional cold MCF and In-Flight MCF cycles. The In-Flight approach potentially increases muon cycling dramatically by skipping the muon transfer step. (Source: Iiyoshi et al., AIP Conference Proceedings, 2019)

Alpha Sticking Problem

One of the most significant challenges in muon-catalyzed fusion has been the alpha sticking problem. Research has focused on understanding the density dependence of the muon alpha sticking fraction in muon-catalyzed deuterium-tritium fusion. Scientists have demonstrated that the reactivation probability depends sensitively on the target stopping power at low ion velocities.

Recent comprehensive reanalysis of the effective muon alpha sticking fraction has placed particular emphasis on the density-dependent dense hydrogen stopping power. Technical improvements include treating the (αμ)+ 2s and 2p states independently with individual reaction rates and recalculating muonic excitation rates considering finite nuclear mass effects.

Recent research has proposed several approaches to mitigate the alpha sticking problem:

1. Density-dependent reactivation: Studies suggest that higher fuel densities can increase the probability of stripping muons from alpha particles
2. Temperature effects: Higher temperatures may influence the sticking fraction and reactivation rates
3. Electromagnetic acceleration: Using cyclotron resonance to accelerate (αμ)+ ions and strip the muons
4. Alternative fusion channels: Exploring deuterium-deuterium reactions with potentially different sticking characteristics

Engineering Challenges and Solutions

Reactor Design Considerations

Creating a practical muon-catalyzed fusion reactor involves several engineering challenges:

1. Muon Production Efficiency: A key focus has been methods of direct conversion of muon-catalyzed fusion energy to reduce the cost of muon production. Some proposals have involved pellets composed of many thin solid deuterium-tritium rods encircled by a metallic circuit immersed in a magnetic field.

2. Tritium Management: To reduce tritium inventory and neutron wall loading, some researchers have considered using laser techniques for manipulating the D-T mixture and exploring heterogeneous D-T mixtures using droplets or jets.

3. Temperature Optimization: Muon-catalyzed fusion reactors would operate at a temperature of 500-1000°C, rather than 100,000,000°C, making it possible to contain the fuel using materials rather than magnetic or inertial confinement.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Acceleron's Reactor Design

Acceleron's reactor works by firing a beam of muons at a pellet of nuclear fuel kept under extremely high pressure. The high-density fusion cell contains a millimeter-scale sample of highly compressed deuterium-tritium that undergoes muon-catalyzed fusion.

This approach could enable the development of relatively small (100 MW) power plants, potentially allowing for the conversion of numerous fossil fuel-based power plants once the technology is ready.

Key components of Acceleron's design include:

1. High-efficiency muon source: Using advanced accelerator technology to minimize energy consumption
2. Diamond anvil compression system: Creating extreme pressures to increase reaction rates
3. Specialized fusion cell: Optimized for maximum reactions per muon
4. Thermal management system: Capturing and converting fusion energy to electricity

Advantages Over Traditional Fusion

Muon-catalyzed fusion offers several potential advantages over traditional fusion approaches:

1. Lower Temperature Operation: Operating at temperatures below 1,000°C instead of 100 million degrees Celsius eliminates the need for plasma containment systems, simplifying design and improving flexibility.

2. Reduced Radioactive Waste: If realized practically, muon-catalyzed D-T fusion would produce far fewer harmful and less long-lived radioactive wastes compared to conventional nuclear fission reactors.

3. Tritium Self-Sufficiency: A significant benefit is that the fusion process can start with pure deuterium gas without tritium. As the reaction proceeds, it generates tritium and increases operating efficiency until the deuterium:tritium ratio reaches about 1:1, allowing the reactor to function as its own tritium factory.

4. Neutron Applications: The neutrons produced in muon-catalyzed D-T fusion could be used to breed fissile fuels from fertile material—for example, thorium-232 could be converted to uranium-233.

5. Safety Advantages: Unlike high-temperature D+T fusion with its risk of explosive processes in plasma-based methods, muon-induced fusion cannot produce explosive processes and is intrinsically much safer.

<figure> <img src="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Kelly-9/publication/351976929/figure/fig3/AS:1027449531932674@1622142204357/Left-Q-elec-versus-assumed-fusion-reactions-catalyzed-per-negative-muon-Q-elec-108-F2H.png" alt="Electrical gain versus fusion reactions per muon" width="600"> <figcaption>Figure 6: Electrical gain (Q_elec) versus fusion reactions catalyzed per negative muon, showing the pathway to breakeven and beyond. (Source: Kelly et al., Journal of Physics: Energy, 2021)</figcaption> </figure>

Challenges to Commercial Viability

Despite recent progress, several significant challenges remain before muon-catalyzed fusion can become commercially viable:

1. Muon Lifetime: Each muon only lasts for about 2.2 microseconds before it decays into less useful subatomic particles. This is long enough to facilitate about 100 fusion reactions, but still insufficient for commercial power purposes.

2. Alpha Sticking: Approximately 0.8% of the time, a muon gets stuck to an alpha particle and doesn't participate in any more fusion reactions, limiting the total number of reactions each muon can catalyze.

3. Energy Balance: The fundamental challenge remains creating "useful power production" unless "an energetically cheaper way of producing μ−-mesons can be found," as Jackson observed in his 1957 paper.

4. Cost Efficiency: According to Gordon Pusch, a physicist at Argonne National Laboratory, while muon-catalyzed fusion can potentially exceed breakeven by accounting for the heat energy the muon beam deposits in the target, the recirculated power (about 3-5 times larger than power to the electrical grid) represents a potentially unacceptably large capital investment.

<figure> <img src="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Kelly-9/publication/351976929/figure/fig2/AS:1027449531932673@1622142204247/Top-left-the-optimal-Qfor-tritons-impacting-a-lithium-lead-target-versus-assumed-fusion.png" alt="Optimization of Q-value for different beam and target combinations" width="600"> <figcaption>Figure 7: Optimization of Q-value for different beam and target combinations showing the relationship between fusion reactions per muon and energy balance. (Source: Kelly et al., Journal of Physics: Energy, 2021)</figcaption> </figure>

Future Prospects

The future of muon-catalyzed fusion as a viable energy source depends on overcoming the key challenges outlined above. Recent advances in accelerator technology, high-strength materials, and computer simulation have significantly improved the feasibility of muon-catalyzed fusion energy.

Despite the challenges, Acceleron Fusion's plasma-free method represents a bold step in fusion innovation. By eliminating the need for plasma confinement, the company is pursuing a simpler, more flexible path to clean energy.

If successful, this approach could lead to an energy revolution with Earth-shattering potential, redefining our technological and economic future.

Specific areas of ongoing research include:

1. Next-generation muon sources: Development of laser-based or other novel approaches to muon production with dramatically improved efficiency
2. Advanced materials for fuel containment: Exploring stronger materials to achieve even higher compression of fusion fuel
3. Alpha sticking mitigation: New approaches to reduce sticking or enhance muon reactivation
4. Alternative fusion fuel cycles: Investigation of non-D-T reactions with potentially different sticking characteristics

Conclusion

Muon-catalyzed fusion represents a fascinating alternative approach to achieving nuclear fusion for energy production. While traditional high-temperature plasma-based fusion methods continue to advance with significant investment, the muon-catalyzed approach offers a complementary path with unique advantages and challenges.

Recent developments, particularly Acceleron Fusion's experimental successes and significant funding, suggest renewed momentum in this field. The coming years will be crucial in determining whether muon-catalyzed fusion can overcome its historical limitations and emerge as a viable component of our future clean energy portfolio.

The confluence of improved accelerator technology, advanced materials science, sophisticated computer modeling, and focused engineering solutions may finally bring this decades-old concept to practical fruition. If successful, muon-catalyzed fusion could provide a safer, cleaner, and more manageable approach to nuclear fusion energy, complementing other renewable and clean energy sources in addressing our growing global energy needs while combating climate change.

References

1. "Muon-catalyzed fusion - Wikipedia." Wikipedia. Retrieved May 1, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion

2. "Fusion Power Breakthrough: Acceleron Fusion's Muon Reactor." IEEE Spectrum, January 24, 2025. https://spectrum.ieee.org/colder-muon-fusion-energy

3. "Acceleron Secures $24M for its Muon-Catalyzed Fusion Reactor." Toward Fusion, December 5, 2024. https://towardfusion.com/acceleron-secures-24m-for-muon-catalyzed-fusion/

4. "Acceleron Fusion: Cracking the Code of Muon-Catalyzed Fusion Energy." Collaborative Fund, December 3, 2024. https://collabfund.com/blog/acceleron-fusion-muon-catalyzed-nuclear-fusion/

5. "Acceleron Fusion Secures $24M Series A Led by Lowercarbon Capital and Collaborative Fund to Revolutionize Clean Energy with Muon-Catalyzed Fusion." PRWeb, December 3, 2024. https://www.prweb.com/releases/acceleron-fusion-secures-24m-series-a-led-by-lowercarbon-capital-and-collaborative-fund-to-revolutionize-clean-energy-with-muon-catalyzed-fusion-302319341.html

6. "US firm's 'cool' plasma-free fusion technology gets funding boost." Interesting Engineering, December 8, 2024. https://interestingengineering.com/energy/us-firm-plasma-free-fusion-technology

7. "Acceleron advances cold fusion technology." Nuclear Engineering International, December 17, 2024. https://www.neimagazine.com/news/acceleron-advances-cold-fusion-technology/

8. "Acceleron Fusion raises $24M in seed funding to advance low-temp fusion." ANS / Nuclear Newswire. https://www.ans.org/news/article-6626/acceleron-fusion-raises-24m-in-seed-funding-to-advance-lowtemp-fusion/

9. "Exclusive: Acceleron Fusion has raised $15M to take a stab at colder fusion, filing reveals." TechCrunch, October 4, 2024. https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/01/acceleron-fusion-has-raised-15m-to-take-another-stab-at-cold-fusion-filing-reveals/

10. "Home | Acceleron Fusion." Acceleron Energy Official Website. https://www.acceleron.energy/

11. "Muon reactivation in muon-catalyzed D-T fusion." ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0146641089900057

12. Takahashi, H. "Some thoughts on the muon catalyzed fusion reactor." United States: N. p., 1986. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6210885

13. "Muon catalyzed fusion - ScienceDirect." ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0920379689900239

14. "A proposed method for reducing the sticking constant in muon catalyzed fusion." OSTI.GOV, August 1, 1988. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6906473

15. Holmlid, L. "Muon-catalyzed fusion and annihilation energy generation will supersede non-sustainable T + D nuclear fusion." Energy, Sustainability and Society, 2022. https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13705-022-00338-4

16. "muon-catalyzed fusion: Topics by Science.gov." Science.gov. https://www.science.gov/topicpages/m/muon-catalyzed+fusion.html

17. "Muon catalyzed fusion." OSTI.GOV, January 1, 1986. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5790040

18. "Alpha sticking fraction calculations in muon catalyzed fusion: Performance report, 1 June 1987-31 May 1988." OSTI.GOV, May 16, 1988. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/12417001/

19. Tajima, T., Eliezer, S., & Kulsrud, R.M. "Direct conversion of muon catalyzed fusion energy." OSTI.GOV, March 1, 1990. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6964059

20. Knowles, P.E., Beer, G.A., & Bailey, J.M. "Muon catalyzed fusion in deuterium at 3 K." OSTI.GOV, December 1, 1995. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/286273/

21. "Muon Catalyzed Fusion | Breakthroughs, Benefits & Challenges." Modern Physics, May 28, 2024. https://modern-physics.org/muon-catalyzed-fusion/

22. "Muon Catalyzed Fusion: Introduction, progress toward high-density yield measurements, and application prospects." MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center. http://www-new.psfc.mit.edu/events/2023/muon-catalyzed-fusion-introduction-progress-toward-high-density-yield-measurements-and

23. "Is muon catalyzed d-3He fusion possible?" ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168900297008796

24. Iiyoshi, A., et al. "Muon catalyzed fusion, present and future." ResearchGate, November 26, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337563892_Muon_catalyzed_fusion_present_and_future

25. Jones, S.E. "Muon-catalysed fusion revisited." Nature, 1986. https://www.nature.com/articles/321127a0

26. Kamimura, M., et al. "Roles of resonant muonic molecule in new kinetics model and muon catalyzed fusion in compressed gas." Scientific Reports, 2022. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-09487-0

27. Nagamine, K. "Muon catalyzed fusion." Chapter 5 in Introductory Muon Science, Cambridge University Press. [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/introductory-muon-science/muon-catalyzed-fusion/836