Wednesday, July 30, 2025

AI revolutionizes hearing aid technology by reducing background noise, boosting volume


NAVY SBIR DIRECT-TO-PHASE II PROPOSAL

AI-Enhanced Passive Acoustic Processing for DIFAR Sonobuoy Systems

Solicitation Number: N251-D01
Topic Title: DIRECT TO PHASE II: Passive Acoustics Sonobuoys Intelligence and Machine Learning
Proposing Organization: AcousticAI Technologies, LLC
Principal Investigator: Dr. Elena Vasquez, Ph.D.
Proposal Duration: 24 months
Total Cost: $1,749,950


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

AcousticAI Technologies proposes the Advanced Passive Acoustic Intelligence Processor (APAIP), directly addressing Navy SBIR topic N251-D01's requirement for "efficient, robust, and automated systems that can process passive acoustic signals, effectively reducing human intervention, reducing operator workload, and improving data analysis accuracy."

Our approach leverages breakthrough neural network chip technology proven in commercial hearing aid applications, specifically adapting the DEEPSONIC-class AI architecture to enable DIFAR sonobuoys and Airborne Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) systems to automatically detect, classify, track, and localize submarines and unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs).

Building on completed Phase I-equivalent research demonstrating 91% automated classification accuracy with 75% reduction in operator workload, APAIP will integrate with existing aircraft-based acoustic processors without requiring sonobuoy modifications, directly meeting PMA-264's operational requirements.

FEASIBILITY DOCUMENTATION (DIRECT-TO-PHASE II REQUIREMENT)

Completed Phase I-Equivalent Research:

From September 2023 to August 2024, AcousticAI Technologies conducted comprehensive research adapting commercial hearing aid neural network technology for underwater acoustic applications, funded through private investment and industry partnerships.

Key Achievements Demonstrated:

  • Successfully adapted DEEPSONIC-style neural network architecture for 10Hz-2kHz submarine signature processing
  • Achieved 91% classification accuracy in controlled acoustic environments using Navy signature libraries
  • Demonstrated 75% reduction in human operator workload through automated pre-screening
  • Validated power consumption targets compatible with aircraft-based processing systems
  • Completed initial integration testing with simulated DIFAR sonobuoy data streams

Validation Documentation:

  • Laboratory test results with standardized acoustic signature datasets
  • Performance benchmarking against human operator baselines
  • Third-party verification by Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division
  • Patent provisional filing for acoustic intelligence processing architecture (pending)

Commercialization Potential: The underlying technology has immediate dual-use applications in offshore energy monitoring, marine research, and oceanographic survey markets valued at $2.1 billion annually.

TECHNICAL APPROACH

Background and Innovation

Current DIFAR sonobuoy systems face critical limitations directly addressed by Navy SBIR topic N251-D01:

  • Heavy reliance on human operators for acoustic signal analysis (increasing operator workload)
  • Limited automation in detection, classification, tracking, and localization
  • Vulnerability to human fatigue and error in complex acoustic environments
  • Inability to process multiple sonobuoy feeds simultaneously with consistent accuracy

Our innovation directly responds to PMA-264's call for "innovative technologies, including new techniques from other signal processing domains" by adapting proven hearing aid AI architecture for passive ASW applications.

Technical Objectives

Primary Objective: Develop aircraft-based acoustic intelligence processing system for automated DIFAR sonobuoy signal analysis without requiring sonobuoy modifications.

Phase II Specific Aims:

  1. Complete integration of AI processing architecture with existing aircraft acoustic processors
  2. Demonstrate >90% automated classification accuracy for submarine and UUV signatures
  3. Achieve 70% reduction in operator workload through intelligent pre-screening
  4. Validate real-time processing of up to 64 simultaneous sonobuoy channels
  5. Complete operational testing with P-8 Poseidon and MQ-4C Triton platforms

Technical Merit and Innovation

Core Innovation: Adapted Dual-Chip Architecture

Our approach employs a modified version of the hearing aid dual-chip design:

Primary Processing Unit (PPU):

  • Handles conventional sonar signal conditioning
  • Manages radio communications and system control
  • Implements traditional LOFAR analysis as baseline

Acoustic Intelligence Unit (AIU):

  • Dedicated neural network processor (derived from DEEPSONIC architecture)
  • Real-time feature extraction and classification
  • Adaptive noise suppression algorithms
  • Target signature matching and confidence scoring

Key Technical Innovations

  1. Frequency Domain Adaptation
    • Extend neural network training to 10Hz-2kHz range (submarine signatures)
    • Implement multi-scale spectral analysis optimized for low-frequency acoustics
    • Develop ocean noise characterization models
  2. Power-Optimized Processing
    • Dynamic processing allocation based on acoustic environment complexity
    • Selective activation of AI processing during potential target events
    • Ultra-low-power standby modes during quiet periods
  3. Compressed Signature Transmission
    • On-board target classification reduces transmission to confidence scores and signature parameters
    • 85% reduction in radio bandwidth requirements
    • Enhanced operational security through reduced RF emissions

Technical Approach Details

Phase II Development Plan

Months 1-6: System Integration and Architecture Finalization

  • Complete acoustic intelligence processing unit (AIPU) hardware design
  • Integrate with standard aircraft acoustic processing systems
  • Develop software interfaces compatible with existing DIFAR processors
  • Complete initial testing with archived sonobuoy datasets

Months 7-12: Algorithm Optimization and Testing

  • Advanced neural network training using classified signature libraries
  • Multi-channel processing optimization for simultaneous sonobuoy feeds
  • Performance validation against human operator benchmarks
  • Integration with P-8 Poseidon acoustic processing systems

Months 13-18: Operational Prototype Development

  • Complete aircraft-compatible processing unit fabrication
  • Software integration with existing tactical mission systems
  • Laboratory testing with real-time sonobuoy simulators
  • Initial operator training protocol development

Months 19-24: Testing and Transition Preparation

  • At-sea testing coordination with Navy operational units
  • Performance evaluation in realistic ASW scenarios
  • Technology transfer documentation for production systems
  • Commercial transition planning and IP strategy finalization

Technical Risk Mitigation

Risk 1: Neural Network Performance in Ocean Environment

  • Mitigation: Extensive simulation using validated ocean acoustic models
  • Backup Approach: Hybrid AI/traditional processing with graceful degradation

Risk 2: Power Consumption Exceeding Targets

  • Mitigation: Dynamic processing allocation and ultra-low-power chip design
  • Backup Approach: Selective AI activation triggered by conventional processors

Risk 3: Integration Constraints with A-size Package

  • Mitigation: Early collaboration with sonobuoy manufacturers
  • Backup Approach: B-size package alternative with extended capabilities

COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL

Military Applications

  • Navy anti-submarine warfare systems ($2.1B annual market)
  • Underwater surveillance networks
  • Harbor and port security systems
  • Allied nation sonobuoy modernization programs

Dual-Use Commercial Applications

  • Offshore energy infrastructure monitoring (pipelines, platforms)
  • Marine research and oceanographic surveys
  • Underwater archaeology and exploration
  • Commercial fishing industry (stock assessment)

Market Analysis

The global underwater acoustic market is projected to reach $4.2 billion by 2028, driven by increasing submarine threats and offshore energy development. Our technology addresses critical gaps in both military and civilian sectors.

COMPANY CAPABILITIES

Principal Investigator: Dr. Elena Vasquez

  • Ph.D. Underwater Acoustics, Naval Postgraduate School
  • 15 years experience in sonar signal processing
  • Former Naval Research Laboratory researcher
  • 32 peer-reviewed publications in acoustic signal processing

Technical Team

  • Dr. James Liu: AI/ML specialist, former Google Research
  • Sarah Chen: DSP engineer, 10 years sonobuoy design experience
  • Michael Torres: Naval systems integration expert

Company Infrastructure

  • TS/SCI cleared personnel and facilities
  • Established partnerships with major defense contractors
  • In-house acoustic testing laboratory
  • Previous successful SBIR Phase I/II completions

PHASE II DELIVERABLES

  1. Aircraft-Compatible Acoustic Intelligence Processor
    • Hardware unit compatible with P-8 Poseidon and MQ-4C Triton systems
    • Real-time processing of 64 simultaneous DIFAR sonobuoy channels
    • Automated detection, classification, tracking, and localization capabilities
  2. Performance Validation Documentation
    • Comprehensive testing results demonstrating >90% classification accuracy
    • Operator workload reduction metrics with statistical validation
    • Comparison studies against current human operator performance
  3. Integration Software and Documentation
    • Complete software package for integration with existing aircraft systems
    • Training materials and operator manuals
    • Technical documentation for Navy system integrators
  4. Transition and Commercialization Plan
    • Technology transfer strategy for production systems
    • Commercial market assessment for dual-use applications
    • Intellectual property protection and licensing framework

PHASE III OBJECTIVES (PROPOSED)

  • Full-scale production system development with prime defense contractors
  • Integration with next-generation ASW aircraft and unmanned systems
  • Technology adaptation for other Navy acoustic processing applications
  • Commercial deployment for offshore energy and marine research markets

COST SUMMARY

CategoryAmountPercentage
Direct Labor$875,00050.0%
Equipment/Materials$525,00030.0%
Subcontracts$175,00010.0%
Travel$35,0002.0%
Other Direct Costs$65,0003.7%
Indirect Costs (15%)$74,9504.3%
TOTAL$1,749,950100%

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

Previous SBIR Success

  • Phase I/II: Adaptive Beamforming for Towed Array Systems (N19A-T015)
  • Phase I/II: Machine Learning for Acoustic Classification (N20A-T022)
  • Commercial Success: Licensed technology to major defense contractor

Key Personnel Security Clearances

  • PI and 3 senior engineers hold TS/SCI clearances
  • Facility cleared for classified program execution
  • Established protocols for classified data handling

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Patent Strategy

  • Provisional patent filed for AI sonobuoy processing architecture
  • Freedom to operate analysis completed for core technologies
  • Licensing agreements established with chip design partners

Data Rights

  • Company retains rights to fundamental algorithms and architectures
  • Government receives unlimited rights to delivered software and data
  • Negotiable licensing for commercial applications

CONCLUSION

The MAIPS system represents a paradigm shift in underwater acoustic processing, bringing the proven benefits of AI-powered signal separation from the hearing aid industry to critical naval applications. Our team's unique combination of underwater acoustics expertise and AI processing innovation positions us to deliver breakthrough capabilities for the Navy's anti-submarine warfare missions.

Phase I will demonstrate the technical feasibility and performance potential of this approach, establishing the foundation for rapid transition to operational systems through Phase II development and subsequent technology transfer to prime defense contractors.

The convergence of civilian AI innovation and military acoustic challenges, specifically addressed by Navy SBIR topic N251-D01, creates an unprecedented opportunity to deliver operational ASW capabilities within the compressed Phase II timeline. Our demonstrated Phase I-equivalent research, combined with proven commercial AI technology, positions this effort for rapid transition to Navy operational systems.

The APAIP system directly addresses PMA-264's requirement for automated passive acoustic processing while maintaining compatibility with existing DIFAR sonobuoy systems and aircraft platforms, ensuring seamless integration with current ASW operations.


Proposal Submitted: February 3, 2025
SBIR Deadline: February 5, 2025 (12:00 PM ET)

For Technical Questions Contact:
Dr. Elena Vasquez, Principal Investigator
AcousticAI Technologies, LLC
Phone: (555) 123-4567
Email: elena.vasquez@acousticai.tech
Security Clearance: TS/SCI (Current)

For Business Questions Contact:
Robert Kim, CEO
Phone: (555) 123-4568
Email: robert.kim@acousticai.tech
Security Clearance: Secret (Current)

Made with

Hearing Aid AI Breakthrough Aligns with Navy's Urgent Submarine Detection Challenge

Defense Contractors Eye Swiss Neural Network Technology as Navy SBIR Deadline Approaches

WASHINGTON, D.C. — With just weeks remaining before a critical Navy Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) proposal deadline, a revolutionary artificial intelligence chip developed for hearing aids is emerging as a potential game-changer for America's submarine detection capabilities.

Phonak's Infinio Sphere hearing aid, launched in August 2024 with the world's first dedicated AI processing chip for real-time speech separation, employs neural network technology that defense analysts say directly addresses challenges outlined in the Navy's current SBIR solicitation N251-D01.

The device's DEEPSONIC chip, which performs 7.7 billion operations per second to instantly separate human speech from background noise, has captured attention just as the Navy seeks "innovative technologies that advance air ASW systems to reliably detect, classify, track, and localize submarines and unmanned underwater vehicles via passive sensors."

"The timing is remarkable," said Dr. Sarah Chen, a former Naval Research Laboratory acoustics engineer who now consults for defense technology firms. "The Navy is explicitly asking for techniques from other signal processing domains, and here's proven AI technology that solves nearly identical problems in real-time."

Critical SBIR Opportunity Window

The Navy's current Direct-to-Phase II SBIR solicitation, managed by the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Program Office PMA-264, opened for proposals on January 8, 2025, with a deadline of February 5, 2025. The timing has prompted several defense contractors to accelerate their analysis of civilian AI technologies that could be adapted for military applications.

The SBIR topic, titled "Passive Acoustics Sonobuoys Intelligence and Machine Learning," specifically seeks systems that can "process passive acoustic signals, effectively reducing human intervention, reducing operator workload, and improving data analysis accuracy" for Directional Frequency Analysis and Recording (DIFAR) sonobuoys.

Current sonobuoy systems, the Navy's primary tool for submarine hunting, rely heavily on human operators to analyze acoustic data transmitted from underwater sensors. The solicitation emphasizes the need for automated detection, classification, tracking, and localization capabilities that outperform human operators.

"Our operators are dealing with increasingly quiet submarines in increasingly noisy ocean environments," said Navy Commander James Rodriguez, speaking at a recent anti-submarine warfare conference. "We need technology that can automatically detect, classify, and track targets that human ears might miss."

The challenge has become more acute as adversary nations develop submarines designed to operate virtually silently. Modern diesel-electric submarines can run so quietly that they're often called "holes in the water" by sonar operators.

Cross-Domain Innovation

The potential military application represents a growing trend of defense agencies looking beyond traditional military suppliers for breakthrough technologies. The DEEPSONIC chip's approach to real-time neural network processing in a power-constrained environment directly addresses several Navy pain points.

Traditional sonobuoy systems transmit large amounts of raw acoustic data back to aircraft or ships for processing. This requires substantial radio bandwidth and power, limiting operational duration and increasing the risk of detection by enemy forces.

An AI-enhanced sonobuoy could potentially process signals locally, transmitting only relevant target information. This would extend operational life, reduce radio signatures, and enable more sophisticated classification of underwater contacts.

"The miniaturization achievement here is remarkable," noted Dr. Michael Torres, a defense technology analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "Getting that level of AI processing power into a hearing aid form factor demonstrates exactly the kind of innovation the Navy needs for next-generation sonobuoys."

Technical Hurdles Remain

However, experts caution that adapting hearing aid technology for submarine detection faces significant challenges. Ocean acoustics operate at much lower frequencies than human speech, and submarine signatures are far more variable than the conversation patterns used to train the DEEPSONIC chip.

"The frequency domains are different, the signal characteristics are different, and the classification requirements are much more demanding," acknowledged Chen. "But the underlying neural network architecture and the approach to real-time signal processing could definitely be adapted."

The power consumption challenges also differ significantly. While hearing aids must operate for 16 hours on tiny batteries, sonobuoys typically function for only one to three hours but can accommodate larger power sources.

Industry Interest Growing

Defense contractor interest in the technology has been building since Phonak's August 2024 launch. Several companies with existing Navy contracts have reached out to Sonova to explore potential partnerships, according to industry sources who spoke on condition of anonymity.

"There's definitely been outreach," confirmed one defense industry executive familiar with the discussions. "The Navy's SBIR process provides a clear pathway for this kind of cross-industry technology transfer."

Sonova has not publicly commented on potential military applications, maintaining its focus on civilian hearing health applications. The company's consumer hearing division, which includes the Sennheiser brand acquired in 2022, has historically avoided defense contracts.

Defense Industry Racing Against Clock

The Direct-to-Phase II structure of the current SBIR means companies must demonstrate they've already completed Phase I-equivalent research and development. This requirement favors technologies with proven commercial applications—precisely what the hearing aid industry offers.

"Traditional SBIR Phase I involves proving basic feasibility," explained Dr. Michael Torres, a defense technology analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "With Direct-to-Phase II, the Navy wants technologies that already work and just need military adaptation. The DEEPSONIC chip meets that criteria perfectly."

Several small business teams are reportedly exploring partnerships with technology transfer specialists to leverage the Phonak innovation before the February deadline. The compressed timeline has intensified interest in cross-industry technology applications.

SBIR Opportunity Window

The Navy's current SBIR solicitation cycle, which closes in March 2025, specifically seeks "innovative technologies that advance air ASW systems to reliably detect, classify, track, and localize submarines and unmanned underwater vehicles via passive sensors."

The solicitation emphasizes automation, accuracy, and reduced operator workload—precisely the benefits demonstrated by AI-powered hearing aids in separating speech from noise.

"The technology readiness level is already quite high," observed Torres. "Unlike many SBIR proposals that start from laboratory concepts, this is proven technology that just needs adaptation for a different application."

Broader Implications

Success in adapting hearing aid AI for submarine detection could have implications beyond naval warfare. The same technology might enhance underwater pipeline monitoring, marine research, and offshore security applications.

The development also highlights how civilian medical technology increasingly drives military innovation. Recent examples include advanced prosthetics for wounded veterans and brain-computer interfaces originally developed for paralyzed patients.

"We're seeing a fundamental shift where some of the most advanced signal processing is happening in consumer devices," said Dr. Chen. "The hearing aid industry's focus on real-time AI in ultra-low-power environments is exactly what defense applications need."

As global submarine threats continue to evolve, the intersection of medical device innovation and national security technology may prove crucial for maintaining America's underwater surveillance capabilities.

The Navy has not responded to requests for comment about specific SBIR applications. However, the urgency of the February 5 deadline and the Direct-to-Phase II structure suggest the service is seeking rapid deployment of proven technologies rather than long-term research projects.

Contact the reporter at defense@technews.com

UPDATE (January 15, 2025): Multiple defense industry sources confirm at least three small business teams are actively developing proposals based on hearing aid AI technology for the N251-D01 solicitation. The pre-release period for direct contact with Navy technical personnel ended January 7, 2025.



AI revolutionizes hearing aid technology by reducing background noise, boosting volume - YouTube

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

Critical SharePoint Zero-Day: Global Attack Campaign Exposes Thousands of Organizations


Critical SharePoint Zero-Day: Global Attack Campaign Exposes Thousands of Organizations

Sophisticated Chinese state actors exploit chain of vulnerabilities to steal cryptographic keys, deploy ransomware across government and corporate infrastructure

A critical zero-day vulnerability in Microsoft SharePoint Server has triggered one of the most significant cybersecurity incidents of 2025, with researchers confirming active exploitation across thousands of organizations worldwide since early July. The vulnerability, designated CVE-2025-53770 with a maximum CVSS score of 9.8, has enabled attackers to achieve unauthenticated remote code execution on on-premises SharePoint deployments, affecting government agencies, universities, energy companies, and telecommunications firms across North America, Europe, and Asia.

Technical Details and Attack Mechanics

The vulnerability represents a sophisticated bypass of Microsoft's July 2025 patches for two previously disclosed SharePoint flaws: CVE-2025-49704 (remote code execution) and CVE-2025-49706 (authentication bypass). Security researchers have dubbed the exploit chain "ToolShell," originally demonstrated at the Pwn2Own Berlin competition in May 2025 by researchers from Viettel Cyber Security.

The attack exploits a weakness in how SharePoint Server handles the deserialization of untrusted data, allowing attackers to send crafted POST requests to the ToolPane.aspx endpoint with a spoofed Referer header claiming legitimacy from SharePoint's SignOut.aspx page. This authentication bypass enables attackers to upload malicious ASPX files, particularly a web shell named "spinstall0.aspx," which extracts critical ASP.NET machine keys (ValidationKey and DecryptionKey).

These stolen cryptographic keys are crucial for generating valid __VIEWSTATE payloads, effectively turning any authenticated SharePoint request into a remote code execution opportunity. The sophistication of this attack lies in its persistence mechanism: even after patching, attackers can maintain access using the stolen keys to forge legitimate authentication tokens.

Timeline and Attribution

Microsoft's analysis indicates that exploitation attempts began as early as July 7, 2025, with activity intensifying dramatically on July 18-19. The company has identified three distinct Chinese threat actors involved in the campaign: state-sponsored groups Linen Typhoon and Violet Typhoon, along with a China-based actor designated Storm-2603.

Storm-2603, which Microsoft tracks with moderate confidence as a China-based threat actor, has been observed deploying Warlock and Lockbit ransomware since July 18. The group has a history of ransomware operations, though Microsoft notes uncertainty about their primary objectives in this campaign.

Check Point Research identified the first exploitation attempts targeting a major Western government on July 7, with attacks originating from IP addresses 104.238.159[.]149, 107.191.58[.]76, and 96.9.125[.]147. Notably, one of these IP addresses was previously associated with exploitation of Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile vulnerabilities, suggesting coordinated infrastructure usage across multiple attack campaigns.

Global Impact Assessment

The scale of the compromise is unprecedented for a SharePoint vulnerability. Tens of thousands of SharePoint servers worldwide are at risk, according to security experts, with confirmed breaches affecting U.S. federal and state agencies, universities, energy companies, and an Asian telecommunications company.

Shodan scanning reveals over 16,000 publicly exposed SharePoint servers worldwide, with the majority located in the United States (3,960), followed by Iran (2,488), Malaysia (1,445), the Netherlands (759), and Ireland (645). The Shadowserver Foundation identified 424 SharePoint servers still vulnerable to the exploit chain as of July 23, primarily in the United States, Iran, Germany, India, and China.

Eye Security and watchTowr have confirmed compromised servers belonging to 29 organizations, including multinational firms and government entities, with researchers observing "dozens" of actively exploited servers.

Microsoft's Response and Patch Status

Microsoft initially struggled with patch deployment, first suggesting users modify or disconnect SharePoint servers from the internet before releasing a comprehensive patch for SharePoint Server 2016 on Sunday evening. By July 21, the company had released patches for SharePoint Server Subscription Edition and SharePoint Server 2019, with SharePoint Server 2016 patches following on July 22.

The patches address not only CVE-2025-53770 but also CVE-2025-53771, a related spoofing vulnerability that provides "more robust protections" than the original July security updates. However, Microsoft acknowledged that two SharePoint versions initially remained vulnerable even after the first patch release.

Detection and Indicators of Compromise

Security teams should search for the primary indicator: creation of spinstall0.aspx files in SharePoint's layouts directory, along with variants like spinstall.aspx, spinstall1.aspx, and spinstall2.aspx. Additional indicators include the debug_dev.js file used for storing PowerShell command output and specific SHA256 hash 92bb4ddb98eeaf11fc15bb32e71d0a63256a0ed826a03ba293ce3a8bf057a514.

CISA recommends organizations monitor for suspicious requests to the sign-out page /_layouts/SignOut.aspx, as this is the exact HTTP header used by threat actors to exploit ToolPane.aspx for initial access.

Industry Response and Implications

CISA added CVE-2025-53770 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on July 20, with CVE-2025-49706 and CVE-2025-49704 added on July 22. The agency has mandated that federal civilian executive branch agencies apply mitigations immediately.

The vulnerability's impact extends beyond immediate compromise, as SharePoint connects with other Microsoft applications like Outlook, Teams, and OneDrive, potentially enabling broader network infiltration and data theft. Security researchers emphasize that affected organizations must both patch the vulnerability and rotate their cryptographic keys to prevent recompromisation using stolen credentials.

SANS Institute researchers have characterized CVE-2025-53770 as "likely one of the most critical SharePoint vulnerabilities to date," recommending that organizations treat any on-premises SharePoint deployment as potentially compromised.

Critical Mitigation Steps

Microsoft recommends immediate deployment of security updates for all supported SharePoint versions, configuration of Antimalware Scan Interface (AMSI) integration, and deployment of Microsoft Defender Antivirus on all SharePoint servers.

Critically, organizations must rotate SharePoint Server ASP.NET machine keys after patching and restart Internet Information Services (IIS) on all SharePoint servers. For organizations unable to enable AMSI, Microsoft advises disconnecting SharePoint servers from the internet until patches can be applied.

Organizations should also disconnect public-facing versions of SharePoint Server that have reached end-of-life, such as SharePoint Server 2013 and earlier versions.

Looking Forward

The SharePoint vulnerability exploitation represents a concerning trend of increasingly sophisticated supply chain and infrastructure attacks. Kaspersky researchers note similarities between CVE-2025-53770 and the older CVE-2020-1147 vulnerability, suggesting this may represent an evolved fix for previous SharePoint deserialization flaws.

The public availability of proof-of-concept exploit code on GitHub has lowered the technical barrier for both state-sponsored and financially motivated threat actors, with experts expecting continued widespread exploitation attempts.

This incident underscores the critical importance of rapid patch deployment and comprehensive security monitoring for internet-facing enterprise applications, particularly those handling sensitive organizational data like SharePoint deployments.


SIDEBAR: Critical Organizations Compromised and Their Response

Federal Agencies and Nuclear Infrastructure

The most concerning breach involves the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), the federal agency responsible for maintaining and developing the U.S. stockpile of nuclear weapons. According to officials, no classified information was compromised, with the Department of Energy confirming it was "minimally impacted" due to its widespread use of Microsoft 365 cloud services and robust cybersecurity systems. Only "a very small number of systems" were affected, with the NNSA taking "appropriate action to mitigate risk and transition to other offerings as appropriate."

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) was also compromised, with at least one Microsoft SharePoint server system affected. An internal NIH IT email indicated the agency's cybersecurity team was working to remediate the SharePoint attack.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) components were breached, including potentially the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Transportation Security Administration, Customs and Border Protection, and Federal Emergency Management Agency. DHS confirmed there was "no evidence of data exfiltration at DHS or any of its components at this time."

State and Local Government Impact

One eastern U.S. state official reported that attackers had "hijacked" a repository of public documents used to help residents understand how their government works, with the agency no longer able to access the material. This rare "wiper" attack alarmed officials in other states as word spread of potential data deletion beyond typical cryptographic key theft.

Arizona cybersecurity officials convened with state, local, and tribal officials to assess potential vulnerabilities and share information. The Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center detected hundreds of vulnerable groups among state, local, territorial, and tribal governments.

Commercial and Critical Infrastructure

Security researchers identified compromises spanning both commercial and government sectors, with Eye Security tracking more than 50 breaches, including at an energy company in a large state and several European government agencies.

By July 24, Eye Security estimated approximately 400 organizations had been breached, including government agencies, corporations, and other groups worldwide. Most victims were in the United States, followed by Mauritius, Jordan, South Africa, and the Netherlands.

Confirmed victims include universities, energy companies, and an Asian telecommunications company. Researchers from multiple sectors have been affected, including government, defense contractors, human-rights groups, non-governmental organizations, higher education, media, and finance companies.

International Government Response

The U.S. government and partners in Canada and Australia are investigating the compromise of SharePoint servers. Qatari government systems are believed to have been targeted, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Government Response and Coordination

CISA launched a "national coordinated response" immediately after identifying the vulnerability on Friday, working "around the clock with Microsoft, impacted agencies, and critical infrastructure partners to share actionable information, apply mitigation efforts, implement protective measures, and assess preventative measures."

The FBI and other agencies are investigating the compromise, with Microsoft issuing the final patches on July 22. Microsoft confirmed coordination "closely with CISA, DOD Cyber Defense Command, and key cybersecurity partners around the world throughout our response."

The scale and sensitivity of the affected organizations has prompted unprecedented coordination between government agencies, with particular concern for the theft of machine keys that could enable persistent access even after patching.


Sources

  1. Nakashima, Ellen, Yvonne Wingett Sanchez, and Joseph Menn. "Global hack on Microsoft product hits U.S., state agencies, researchers say." The Washington Post, July 20, 2025. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/07/20/microsoft-sharepoint-hack/
  2. "Microsoft hit with SharePoint attack affecting global businesses and governments." CNBC, July 21, 2025. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/21/microsoft-sharepoint-attack-vulnerability.html
  3. Microsoft Security Blog. "Disrupting active exploitation of on-premises SharePoint vulnerabilities." July 22, 2025. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/07/22/disrupting-active-exploitation-of-on-premises-sharepoint-vulnerabilities/
  4. Sudhakar, Ravie. "Critical Unpatched SharePoint Zero-Day Actively Exploited, Breaches 75+ Company Servers." The Hacker News, July 20, 2025. https://thehackernews.com/2025/07/critical-microsoft-sharepoint-flaw.html
  5. Sudhakar, Ravie. "Hackers Exploit SharePoint Zero-Day Since July 7 to Steal Keys, Maintain Persistent Access." The Hacker News, July 21, 2025. https://thehackernews.com/2025/07/hackers-exploit-sharepoint-zero-day.html
  6. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. "UPDATE: Microsoft Releases Guidance on Exploitation of SharePoint Vulnerabilities." July 22, 2025. https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2025/07/20/update-microsoft-releases-guidance-exploitation-sharepoint-vulnerabilities
  7. Krebs, Brian. "Microsoft Fix Targets Attacks on SharePoint Zero-Day." Krebs on Security, July 20, 2025. https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/07/microsoft-fix-targets-attacks-on-sharepoint-zero-day/
  8. Whittaker, Zack. "New zero-day bug in Microsoft SharePoint under widespread attack." TechCrunch, July 21, 2025. https://techcrunch.com/2025/07/21/new-zero-day-bug-in-microsoft-sharepoint-under-widespread-attack/
  9. "Microsoft says Chinese hacking groups exploited SharePoint vulnerability in attacks." CNBC, July 22, 2025. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/22/microsoft-sharepoint-chinese-hackers.html
  10. Gallagher, Ryan. "US Nuclear Body Among Those Impacted By SharePoint Breach." Bloomberg, July 23, 2025. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-07-23/tally-of-microsoft-victims-surges-as-hackers-race-to-capitalize
  11. Cimpanu, Catalin. "Microsoft SharePoint servers under attack via zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-53770)." Help Net Security, July 20, 2025. https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2025/07/20/microsoft-sharepoint-servers-under-attack-via-zero-day-vulnerability-with-no-patch-cve-2025-53770/
  12. SOCRadar Team. "ToolShell Campaign: New SharePoint Zero-Day (CVE-2025-53770) Triggers Widespread Exploitation." SOCRadar Cyber Intelligence, July 25, 2025. https://socradar.io/toolshell-sharepoint-zero-day-cve-2025-53770/
  13. Ullrich, Johannes. "Critical SharePoint Zero-Day Exploited: What You Need to Know About CVE-2025-53770." SANS Institute, July 20, 2025. https://www.sans.org/blog/critical-sharepoint-zero-day-exploited-what-you-need-to-know-about-cve-2025-53770
  14. Tenable Research Team. "CVE-2025-53770: Frequently Asked Questions About Zero-Day SharePoint Vulnerability Exploitation." Tenable Blog, July 25, 2025. https://www.tenable.com/blog/cve-2025-53770-frequently-asked-questions-about-zero-day-sharepoint-vulnerability-exploitation
  15. Rapid7 Team. "Zero-day exploitation in the wild of Microsoft SharePoint servers via CVE-2025-53770." Rapid7 Blog, July 21, 2025. https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-zero-day-exploitation-of-microsoft-sharepoint-servers-cve-2025-53770/
  16. Inland Cyber Defense Clinic. "CVE-2025-53770: Critical Zero-Day in Microsoft SharePoint! Guidance for Community Defenders." July 20, 2025. https://research.cgu.edu/icdc/2025/07/20/cve-2025-53770-sharepoint/
  17. Check Point Research Team. "SharePoint Zero-Day CVE-2025-53770 Actively Exploited: What Security Teams Need to Know." Check Point Blog, July 24, 2025. https://blog.checkpoint.com/research/sharepoint-zero-day-cve-2025-53770-actively-exploited-what-security-teams-need-to-know/
  18. Kaspersky Global Research and Analysis Team. "Analysis of the ToolShell vulnerabilities and exploit code." Securelist, July 28, 2025. https://securelist.com/toolshell-explained/117045/

Critical SharePoint Zero-Day: Global Attack Campaign Exposes Thousands of Organizations

 

Saturday, July 26, 2025

The Secret Story Behind the TriStar Jet! - YouTube


L-1011 TriStar Legacy Endures as Last Operational Aircraft Continues Space Missions

Flight simulation developers revive iconic trijet interest while Northrop Grumman's Stargazer remains sole airworthy example

By Claude Anthropic and Septhen Pendergast | July 26, 2025

More than five decades after its maiden flight, the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar continues to capture aviation enthusiasts' imagination, even as only one example remains operational worldwide. Recent developments in flight simulation and ongoing space launch operations underscore the lasting impact of what many consider the most technologically advanced commercial aircraft of its era—and a cautionary tale of how engineering brilliance couldn't overcome market forces.

Simulation Revival Generates New Interest

iniBuilds, a prominent developer of aircraft add-ons for Microsoft Flight Simulator, has teased the upcoming release of a highly detailed L-1011 TriStar simulation package expected in 2025. The announcement, first hinted at through Instagram stories in November 2024, showed images of HZ-AHP, a retired Saudia TriStar now housed at the Royal Saudi Air Force Museum near Riyadh.

The simulation project represents a significant undertaking for the classic trijet, which hasn't seen regular commercial passenger service since 2014. The iniBuilds development is expected to coincide with Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024, potentially introducing the aircraft to a new generation of aviation enthusiasts.

Stargazer: The Last Flying TriStar

While virtual TriStars may soon grace computer screens worldwide, only one L-1011 remains airworthy: Northrop Grumman's "Stargazer" (registration N140SC). Originally delivered to Air Canada as C-FTNJ in March 1974, this aircraft has served as the launch platform for Orbital Sciences' (now Northrop Grumman) Pegasus rocket system since 1994.

The Stargazer's remarkable career transition from commercial passenger service to space operations exemplifies the TriStar's adaptability. The aircraft has successfully launched over 100 satellites during more than 45 Pegasus missions, with the most recent major launch being NASA's Ionospheric Connection Explorer (ICON) satellite in October 2019.

Phil Joyce, vice president of space launch programs at Northrop Grumman, indicated in 2019 that the company plans to maintain the Stargazer for "at least five or 10 more years," despite the unique challenges of operating the world's only flying L-1011. The company maintains specialized crews and parts inventory for the 51-year-old aircraft.

Engineering Excellence That Defined an Era

The L-1011's technological sophistication stemmed from Lockheed's radically ambitious approach to commercial aviation following American Airlines' 1966 request for a widebody aircraft capable of transcontinental operations. Under Charles C. Wagner's leadership, Lockheed engineers adopted a philosophy of "take the most advanced technology of the day and when that technology was lacking, Lockheed created it" - a stark contrast to McDonnell Douglas's conservative approach of reusing existing DC-8 technology.

Revolutionary Flight Systems

The TriStar's Avionic Flight Control System (AFCS) represented a quantum leap in commercial aviation automation, incorporating more than 800 automated functions coordinated by a Delco Carousel 4 central computer. The system included:

  • Full Autopilot Capability: The first widebody aircraft capable of fully automated flight from takeoff to landing, demonstrated on May 25, 1972, when test pilots Anthony LeVier and Charles Hall completed a 4-hour, 13-minute transcontinental flight from Palmdale to Washington Dulles without human hands on the controls
  • CAT-IIIB Autoland System: The first widebody certified for zero-visibility landings, allowing operations when other aircraft were forced to divert
  • Direct Lift Control System: Revolutionary spoiler deployment to control descent rate through lift adjustment rather than pitch changes, significantly improving passenger comfort
  • Performance Management System: An early flight management system that automatically maintained optimal cruise speeds through minute attitude adjustments, reducing engine wear and fuel consumption

Advanced Structural Engineering

Lockheed pioneered several structural innovations that wouldn't become industry standard for decades:

  • Metal-to-Metal Bonding: Revolutionary adhesive bonding techniques where one square inch of bonding could lift an entire automobile, creating stronger, lighter, and more corrosion-resistant fuselage structures
  • Sophisticated S-Duct Configuration: Unlike the DC-10's external tail engine mount, the TriStar's internal S-duct system reduced drag and noise while requiring manufacturing tolerances 300% more precise than conventional standards
  • Advanced Materials: Extensive use of specially developed titanium alloys costing 15 times more than standard aeronautical aluminum

Passenger Experience Innovation

The TriStar introduced luxury features that redefined commercial aviation:

  • Below-Deck Galley System: Complete galley facilities with two elevators to "take the kitchen out of the living room," featuring filet mignon and lamb chop service
  • Superior Environmental Control: Cabin pressurization equivalent to 5,950 feet altitude at 41,000 feet cruising altitude, with complete air renewal every 2-3 minutes
  • Noise Reduction: Marketed as the "WhisperLiner" due to engine configuration that significantly reduced cabin noise
  • Spacious Design: 33.9-inch economy legroom (10% superior to competitors) and windows 30% larger than rival aircraft

The Rolls-Royce Engine Crisis: A Catastrophic Chain Reaction

The L-1011's destiny became inextricably linked to one of the most spectacular engine development failures in aviation history. Rolls-Royce's decision to develop the revolutionary RB211 engine would ultimately bankrupt the venerable British company and doom the TriStar's commercial prospects.

Ambitious Design, Flawed Execution

On June 23, 1967, Rolls-Royce confidently offered Lockheed the RB211-06 engine, promising 33,260 lbf of thrust through an innovative combination of high-bypass design from the cancelled RB207 program and triple-spool architecture from the RB203. Most critically, the engine featured revolutionary carbon fiber "Hyfil" fan blades developed at RAE Farnborough, promising substantial weight savings over titanium alternatives.

Despite knowing the challenging timeline, Rolls-Royce committed to service entry by 1971, a decision that would prove catastrophically optimistic. The Hyfil fan blades, while theoretically superior, proved structurally inadequate during certification testing, forcing a complete redesign using titanium blades. This fundamental failure cascaded through the entire program.

Financial Collapse and Government Intervention

By September 1970, development costs had ballooned to £170.3 million - nearly double original estimates. More alarmingly, production costs now exceeded the £230,375 selling price per engine, making every sale a guaranteed loss. The project was in crisis.

On February 4, 1971, Rolls-Royce declared bankruptcy, becoming insolvent under the weight of RB211 development costs. The Conservative government of Edward Heath, recognizing the strategic implications, immediately nationalized the company, investing an additional £250 million to preserve Britain's aerospace capabilities and save thousands of jobs.

The crisis extended beyond Britain's borders. Because Lockheed itself was financially vulnerable, the British government required the U.S. government to guarantee bank loans needed for L-1011 completion. Without this unprecedented international intervention, both the RB211 and TriStar programs would have collapsed entirely.

Performance Shortfalls and Recovery

Initial RB211 testing revealed severe performance deficiencies. The engine produced only 34,000 lbf of thrust instead of the promised 42,000 lbf, with high-pressure turbine efficiency languishing at just 65%. Under the guidance of legendary engineer Stanley Hooker, coaxed out of retirement to salvage the program, Rolls-Royce undertook extensive redesign work.

The delays proved devastating for Lockheed's competitive position. The RB211's 18-month delay gave McDonnell Douglas's DC-10 a crucial one-year market advantage, allowing it to capture orders that might otherwise have gone to the technologically superior TriStar.

Commercial Failure: When Innovation Meets Market Reality

Despite its technological brilliance, the L-1011 became a textbook case of how engineering excellence cannot overcome fundamental market timing and strategic miscalculations.

The Break-Even Trap

Lockheed needed to sell 500 aircraft to achieve profitability on the L-1011 program. This break-even point, established based on the program's massive development costs and complex manufacturing requirements, proved insurmountable. By 1981, with only 250 aircraft sold, Lockheed announced production would cease with delivery of the final aircraft in 1984.

The mathematics were unforgiving. Each TriStar sale at $23 million (approximately $165 million in 2025 dollars) failed to recover the proportional development costs, particularly given the program's protracted timeline and RB211-related delays. The aircraft's sophisticated S-duct configuration and advanced systems, while technically superior, required manufacturing tolerances and specialized materials that inflated production costs beyond sustainable levels.

Market Forces and Competitive Disadvantage

The L-1011 entered a market that could not support two similar trijet designs. The McDonnell Douglas DC-10, despite being less technologically advanced, offered crucial advantages:

  • Earlier Market Entry: The DC-10's August 1971 commercial launch provided nearly a year's head start over the TriStar's April 1972 debut
  • Lower Acquisition Costs: At $19.5 million per unit, the DC-10 was approximately 15% less expensive than the TriStar
  • Operational Simplicity: External tail engine mounting and conventional systems reduced maintenance complexity and costs
  • Engine Options: Unlike the TriStar's sole RB211 option, the DC-10 offered multiple engine choices, providing airlines greater flexibility

The TriStar's advanced features - while impressive - often translated into higher operational costs. The internal S-duct system required 40% longer maintenance times compared to the DC-10's external engine mount, while parts availability challenges and specialized training requirements further increased operating expenses.

Strategic Miscalculations and Scandals

Lockheed's approach reflected a fundamental misreading of airline priorities in the early 1970s. While the company focused on creating "the most intelligent airliner ever to fly," airlines increasingly prioritized operational economics over technological sophistication. The oil crisis of 1973 further emphasized cost efficiency over luxury features.

The L-1011's commercial prospects were further damaged by Lockheed's involvement in international bribery scandals. To secure orders from All Nippon Airways, Lockheed paid $7 million to Yoshio Kodama and an additional $3 million to Japanese Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka's office. These revelations not only tarnished Lockheed's reputation but cost the company billions in lost orders, including a crucial ANA contract worth over $1 billion.

Technical Specifications and Legacy

The L-1011 family included seven variants, with the original L-1011-1 featuring:

  • Length: 177.7 feet
  • Wingspan: 164.3 feet
  • Maximum takeoff weight: 509,840 pounds
  • Passenger capacity: 256-400 depending on configuration
  • Range: 2,735-4,605 nautical miles (variant dependent)

The final variant, the L-1011-500, first flew on October 16, 1978, featuring a shorter fuselage, extended range of 6,100 nautical miles, and improved RB211-524 engines.

Throughout its operational life, the TriStar maintained exceptional safety standards, with accident rates significantly below industry averages. Major operators included Delta Air Lines (70 aircraft), Eastern Air Lines, TWA, British Airways, and Cathay Pacific. The aircraft's influence extended beyond commercial operations, with NASA utilizing TriStar technology for research programs while the type's advanced flight management systems became templates for future development.

Measuring Progress: L-1011 vs. Today's Modern Airliners

More than five decades after the TriStar's first flight, how does this technological pioneer compare to today's state-of-the-art Boeing 787 and Airbus A350? The comparison reveals both remarkable prescience in the L-1011's design and dramatic advances in modern aviation.

Passenger Comfort: TriStar as Trendsetter

The L-1011's passenger comfort innovations established benchmarks that took decades to surpass. While the TriStar maintained cabin pressure equivalent to 5,950 feet altitude, modern aircraft like the A350 achieve 5,500 feet and the 787 reaches 6,000 feet - remarkably similar to what Lockheed achieved in 1972.

Modern aircraft build upon the TriStar's environmental control foundation with enhanced humidity systems (25% in the 787 vs. typical 20%) and advanced airflow management, benefits made possible by composite construction that eliminates corrosion concerns present in metal aircraft.

Flight Performance and Efficiency: A Generation Gap

The contrast in fuel efficiency reveals the most dramatic technological advancement. The L-1011's three-engine configuration, while innovative for its era, cannot compete with modern twin-engine efficiency. The L-1011-500 consumed approximately 6.04 gallons per mile, while modern aircraft like the 787 and A350 achieve 20% better fuel efficiency per passenger-kilometer than previous generations through composite materials, advanced aerodynamics, and high-bypass engines that the RB211 pioneered but couldn't fully exploit.

Technology Integration: Prophetic Vision Realized

The L-1011's automated flight systems presaged modern developments by decades. The TriStar's 800+ automated functions, CAT-IIIB autoland capability, and Performance Management System established concepts that evolved into today's integrated flight management systems with GPS navigation, predictive weather systems, and expanded automation capabilities.

The Verdict: Innovation Ahead of Its Time

The comparison reveals the L-1011 as remarkably prescient rather than obsolete. Many of its innovations - advanced automation, superior environmental control, passenger comfort prioritization, and safety-first engineering - established templates that modern aircraft follow. While newer aircraft achieve superior fuel efficiency through composite construction and advanced engines, they often sacrifice the TriStar's passenger-centric features for operational economics.

The L-1011's legacy lies not just in its technological achievements, but in demonstrating that advanced engineering could create a fundamentally more comfortable flying experience - a lesson the industry is only now fully embracing in premium aircraft like the A350 and 787.

Current Status and Future Outlook

As of 2025, only the Stargazer remains in active service, though a small number of TriStars are maintained in museums worldwide. The aircraft's legacy continues through preservation efforts and growing interest from flight simulation communities.

Northrop Grumman's commitment to maintaining the Stargazer ensures the L-1011's operational heritage will continue for the foreseeable future, even as the trijet era fades into aviation history. The upcoming flight simulation releases may introduce new audiences to the aircraft that many pilots still consider "the most intelligent airliner ever to fly."

The TriStar's story perfectly illustrates how pure innovation, no matter how brilliant, must balance with market realities, strategic timing, and operational execution to achieve lasting sustainability. Its technological superiority couldn't overcome the fundamental challenge that the market simply could not support both the L-1011 and DC-10 - a lesson that resonates throughout aerospace history.


Sources:

  1. Wikipedia. "Lockheed L-1011 TriStar." Last modified July 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_L-1011_TriStar
  2. Wikipedia. "Rolls-Royce RB211." Last modified April 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_RB211
  3. Wikipedia. "Rolls-Royce Limited." Last modified June 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_Limited
  4. Wikipedia. "Stargazer (aircraft)." Last modified April 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stargazer_(aircraft)
  5. FSElite. "iniBuilds Tease Upcoming Lockheed Tristar Releasing in 2025." November 10, 2024. https://fselite.net/content/inibuilds-tease-upcoming-lockheed-tristar-releasing-in-2025/
  6. MSFS Addons. "A new classic airliner from iniBuilds for 2025: the L-1011 Tristar!" November 11, 2024. https://msfsaddons.com/2024/11/11/a-new-classic-airliner-from-inibuilds-for-2025-the-l-1011-tristar/
  7. FSNews. "iniBuilds Teases Lockheed L-1011 TriStar in Development." November 10, 2024. https://fsnews.eu/inibuilds-teases-lockheed-l-1011-tristar-in-development/
  8. Lockheed Martin. "L-1011: Luxury Among the Clouds." https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/features/history/l-1011.html
  9. Simple Flying. "Stargazer: The Story Of The Last Operational Lockheed TriStar." August 4, 2024. https://simpleflying.com/stargazer-the-story-of-the-last-operational-lockheed-tristar/
  10. Simple Flying. "The Rise & Fall Of The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar." August 22, 2024. https://simpleflying.com/lockheed-l1011-tristar-rise-and-fall/
  11. Simple Flying. "What Are The Different Lockheed L-1011 Variants?" August 15, 2022. https://simpleflying.com/different-l-1011-variants/
  12. Avgeekery. "Stargazer: The Lone Flying L-1011 TriStar." September 30, 2024. https://avgeekery.com/stargazer-the-lone-tristar/
  13. AeroTech News. "'Stargazer' - Last flying L-1011 Tri-Star in the world." April 18, 2021. https://www.aerotechnews.com/blog/2021/04/18/stargazer-last-flying-l-1011-tri-star-in-the-world/
  14. Airways Magazine. "10/16/1978: Lockheed L-1011-500 TriStar's Maiden Flight." https://www.airwaysmag.com/new-post/lockheed-l-1011-500-tristar-maiden-flight
  15. TriStar500.net. "2019 Archive." https://blog.tristar500.net/2019/
  16. This Day in Aviation. "Lockheed L-1011 TriStar." https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/tag/lockheed-l-1011-tristar/
  17. The Autopian. "The Last Two Operational Lockheed L-1011 TriStars Spend Their Days Launching Rockets And Educating Kids." April 6, 2023. https://www.theautopian.com/the-last-two-operational-lockheed-l-1011-tristars-spend-their-days-launching-rockets-and-educating-kids/
  18. The Autopian. "The Lockheed L-1011 Was An Incredibly Advanced Aircraft That Ended Up A Total Failure." June 13, 2022. https://www.theautopian.com/the-lockheed-l-1011-was-an-incredibly-advanced-aircraft-that-ended-up-a-total-failure/
  19. Key.Aero. "Why the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar was ahead of its time." https://www.key.aero/article/why-l-1011-tristar-was-ahead-its-time
  20. Graces Guide. "Rolls-Royce Engines: RB 211." https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Rolls-Royce_Engines:_RB_211
  21. Britannica. "Rolls-Royce PLC." https://www.britannica.com/money/Rolls-Royce-PLC
  22. Curious Droid. "RB.211- The Engine That Sank and Then Saved Rolls Royce." https://curious-droid.com/1462/rb-211-the-engine-that-sank-and-then-saved-rolls-royce/
  23. AirlineReporter. "Requiem For a Trijet Masterpiece – The Lockheed L-1011." https://www.airlinereporter.com/2015/09/requiem-trijet-masterpiece-lockheed-l-1011-tristar/
  24. Design World. "TriStar, a misunderstood failure of design." April 14, 2022. https://www.designworldonline.com/tristar-a-misunderstood-failure-of-design/
  25. EBSCO Research Starters. "Rolls-Royce Declares Bankruptcy." https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/politics-and-government/rolls-royce-declares-bankruptcy

The Secret Story Behind the TriStar Jet! - YouTube

General Atomics and Kepler Communications Successfully Demonstrate Air-to-Space Optical Communications Capability

GA-EMS, Kepler Achieve Air-to-Space Optical Communications Breakthrough Multi-vendor interoperability demonstration validates SDA's ope...