USSF Awards Initial ‘Golden Dome’ Prototype Contracts, Signaling Strategic Shift to Space-Based Defense – SatNews

USSF Awards Initial ‘Golden Dome’ Prototype Contracts, Signaling Strategic Shift to Space-Based Defense – SatNews

Space Force Awards First Golden Dome Interceptor Contracts in Secretive Strategic Shift

BLUF: The U.S. Space Force has awarded initial prototype contracts to Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Anduril Industries, and True Anomaly for space-based interceptor development, marking the first concrete procurement under the Trump administration's Golden Dome initiative—a fundamental transformation of U.S. missile defense from ground-based systems to orbital boost-phase intercepts designed to counter advanced threats from China and Russia.

Pentagon Maintains Operational Security Over Initial Awards

The Space Force confirmed awarding multiple contracts through competitive Other Transaction Agreements but declined to identify the winners, stating contractor names are protected by enhanced security measures. However, sources familiar with the matter identified the recipients as Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Anduril Industries, and True Anomaly, according to Reuters reporting.

While contract values were not officially disclosed, a July Pentagon presentation indicated interceptor awards would be approximately $120,000 each, with sources stating Northrop Grumman and Anduril received contracts valued at $10 million. The Space Force noted that contracts under $9 million fall below Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement thresholds requiring public disclosure.

The awards represent the Pentagon's first material procurement for space-based interceptors since President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing Golden Dome in January 2025. Trump announced the program publicly in May 2025, stating it would cost approximately $175 billion and achieve initial operating capability within three years.

Multi-Phased Competition Structure Incentivizes Rapid Development

The government structured the competition with prize pools to incentivize rapid development, with the largest pool of $340 million split among companies successfully completing on-orbit tests—first place receiving $125 million and fifth place receiving $40 million. The ultimate production contracts are estimated at $1.8 billion to $3.4 billion annually, according to the Pentagon presentation.

However, industry executives warn of substantial development costs. Estimates suggest building and testing a single space-based interceptor prototype could cost between $200 million and $2 billion, placing significant financial risk on contractors during the demonstration phase.

The Space Force plans to issue a separate request for prototype proposals for kinetic energy midcourse interceptors in early December, with awards expected in February. The initial contracts focus specifically on boost-phase interceptors designed to engage threats within minutes of launch.

Industry Response Demonstrates Diverse Approaches

Traditional defense primes and emerging commercial space firms are pursuing markedly different development strategies. Northrop Grumman, which served as prime contractor for the space-based interceptor component of President Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative in the 1980s, has begun ground testing of SBI technology.

During a July earnings call, Northrop Grumman CEO Kathy Warden stated the company is conducting ground-based tests and providing operational analysis to the Pentagon, emphasizing capabilities can be accelerated into the administration's timeframe.

Lockheed Martin announced plans for an on-orbit demonstration of space-based interceptors by 2028, with CEO Jim Taiclet stating the company is building full operational prototypes designed for production at scale. Lockheed has established a prototyping environment at its Center for Innovation in Virginia to develop Golden Dome command and control capabilities with industry partners.

Startup Apex Space is self-funding a $15 million demonstration called Project Shadow, scheduled to launch in June 2026. The mission will deploy two interceptors from an orbital magazine hosted on Apex's Nova satellite bus, demonstrating environmental control, fire control, and in-space cross-link capabilities.

Technical Challenges Persist Despite Matured Technology

General Michael Guetlein, appointed to lead Golden Dome, stated during a defense summit that necessary technologies exist today, asserting "we have proven every element of the physics". However, significant engineering obstacles remain.

Space-based interceptors must achieve high closing velocities against targets while operating in extreme thermal and radiation environments. Raymond Sharp, Northrop Grumman's Golden Dome enterprise lead, noted that processing speed and key components have advanced significantly since the Brilliant Pebbles era of the 1980s.

Hannah Dennis, a Congressional Research Service analyst, identified accurate discrimination between incoming missiles, space debris, and decoys as a primary technical hurdle, along with maturing space-based interceptor technology for operational deployment.

The orbital mechanics present fundamental constraints. Interceptors must maintain rapid orbits near the atmosphere's edge to avoid falling back to Earth, with only a small fraction positioned to engage any given threat at launch—a challenge critics argue makes space-based systems less efficient than terrestrial defenses for regional coverage.

Architecture Leverages Existing Sensor Infrastructure

Golden Dome integrates multiple layers beyond interceptors. The architecture includes the Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor layer, proliferated space-based interceptors for boost-phase and mid-course intercepts, and the Space Development Agency's Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture custody layer for tracking.

L3Harris and Northrop Grumman each built prototype HBTSS satellites launched in February 2025 for the Missile Defense Agency in conjunction with the Space Development Agency. L3Harris completed a $100 million expansion at its Palm Bay, Florida facility in August to support production of satellites for Golden Dome, investing over 900,000 square feet nationwide in manufacturing space for missile warning and defense technologies.

The National Security Space Association's Moorman Center argued in a November report that positioning, navigation, and timing capabilities are critical to Golden Dome's ability to track targets and guide interceptors, recommending the Pentagon establish dedicated PNT funding and assign a coordination lead.

Cost Projections Span Wide Range

Budget estimates vary dramatically based on constellation size and operational assumptions. The White House estimates $175 billion total cost, while the Congressional Budget Office projects $161 billion to $542 billion over 20 years. Todd Harrison of the American Enterprise Institute published analysis showing potential costs ranging from $252 billion to $3.6 trillion depending on architecture ambition, geographic coverage requirements, threat types addressed, and resilience levels.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act reconciliation legislation included $25 billion for integrated air and missile defense efforts over five years, with $5.6 billion specifically designated for space-based and boost-phase intercept capabilities.

Annual sustainment represents an additional consideration. Orbital systems face constant threats from debris, radiation degradation, and potential anti-satellite weapons. Maintaining sufficient inventory during replenishment cycles requires continuous production and launch operations, with costs amplified by atmospheric drag in low Earth orbit.

Strategic Rationale Emphasizes Adversary Capabilities

Pentagon officials cite advances in Chinese and Russian missile technology as driving Golden Dome's urgency. General Guetlein stated during a defense summit that China and Russia have been building hypersonic missiles capable of traveling in excess of 6,000 miles per hour and maneuvering during terminal phase, plus satellites that can orbit Earth and navigate to any target point.

The boost-phase intercept concept aims to engage threats before deployment of countermeasures or multiple independent reentry vehicles. Michelle Mathieson, Northrop Grumman's SBI lead, stated that compared to current intercept capabilities, space-based interceptors engage in less time with less energy and intercept closer to adversary launch sites.

The Arms Control Association noted that Russia has been developing anti-satellite weapons, undersea torpedoes, hypersonic glide vehicles, and nuclear-powered cruise missiles to overcome future U.S. space-based interceptor networks, while China may respond by expanding its nuclear-armed ballistic missile force.

International Response and Treaty Considerations

China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson criticized Golden Dome in May 2025, claiming it violates the Outer Space Treaty's principle of peaceful use of space and risks turning space into a war zone. A November 2025 Chinese State Council white paper criticized the pursuit of absolute security, stating it poses serious threats to outer space security.

The 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits placing weapons of mass destruction in orbit but remains ambiguous regarding conventional weapons. Arms control advocates argue space-based interceptors could trigger destabilizing arms races, while proponents contend deterring first-strike capabilities enhances strategic stability.

New Zealand Defence Minister Judith Collins expressed support, stating she views Golden Dome as a defense mechanism rather than an attack system, though Trump has indicated the system would serve both defensive and offensive purposes.

Acquisition Strategy Emphasizes Commercial Innovation

The Pentagon's approach reflects a broader shift toward commercial space sector agility. The inclusion of non-traditional defense companies Anduril Industries and True Anomaly alongside established primes validates the emphasized buy-versus-build shift, prioritizing rapid development through commercial innovation.

Tom Karako, director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies' Missile Defense Project, noted that putting development onus on industry has potential upsides and downsides for both suppliers and government customers. The prize-pool structure attempts to accelerate timelines while managing taxpayer risk, though critics question whether commercial firms can meet stringent reliability and security requirements for weapons systems.

Karako argued in a November opinion piece that Congress, industry, and the American public need more information about Golden Dome, stating the initiative will be real and durable only when its logic is understood on a broad, bipartisan, public basis. The Pentagon's operational security measures have limited public discussion, with reports suggesting officials discouraged Golden Dome references at trade association conferences.

Timeline Faces Skepticism Despite Accelerated Pace

Trump stated the project would achieve initial operating capability within three years, targeting completion before the end of his term in January 2029. Defense analysts universally question whether this timeline is achievable given technical complexity and production requirements.

Space Force General Stephen Whiting, Space Command commander, stated that space fires and space-based interceptors are key components of how the command wins, emphasizing the need for credible, acknowledged kinetic and non-kinetic capabilities.

The parallel competitive approach—funding multiple designs simultaneously—aims to reduce technical risk by avoiding premature downselection. However, budget realities may eventually force consolidation to one or two production designs.

International partnerships may factor into future deployment. Japan, South Korea, and Australia have expressed interest in contributing to or integrating with U.S. space-based missile defense capabilities, particularly given regional concerns about North Korean and Chinese missile programs.

As prototypes transition from concept to hardware over the next two years, the defense community will assess whether Golden Dome represents a genuine transformation in missile defense architecture or encounters the hard realities that constrained previous space-based interceptor programs during the Strategic Defense Initiative era.

---

Sources and Formal Citations

1. "Golden Dome (missile defense system)." Wikipedia. Accessed November 30, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Dome_(missile_defense_system)

2. Albon, Courtney. "Report: Pentagon Can't Forget About PNT for Golden Dome." Air & Space Forces Magazine, November 5, 2025. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/report-pentagon-golden-dome-architecture-pnt/

3. Insinna, Valerie. "Golden Dome: Space Force awards first space-based interceptor prototype contracts." Breaking Defense, November 25, 2025. https://breakingdefense.com/2025/11/golden-dome-space-force-awards-first-space-based-boost-phase-interceptor-prototype-contracts/

4. Albon, Courtney. "Space Force Awards First Contracts for Golden Dome Interceptors." Air & Space Forces Magazine, November 25, 2025. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/space-force-first-contracts-golden-dome-space-based-interceptors/

5. Jamison, Miles. "Space Force Issues Contracts for Golden Dome Interceptors." Executive Gov, November 26, 2025. https://www.executivegov.com/articles/space-force-golden-dome-interceptors-contracts/

6. Harrison, Todd. "Golden Dome is a Trillion Dollar Gambit." War on the Rocks, September 19, 2025. https://warontherocks.com/2025/09/golden-dome-is-a-trillion-dollar-gambit/

7. Capaccio, Anthony. "Space Force Awards Secret Contracts for Golden Dome Interceptors." Bloomberg, November 25, 2025. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-25/space-force-awards-secret-contracts-for-golden-dome-interceptors

8. Wilson, James. "CENTER FOR SPACE POLICY AND STRATEGY BUDGET BRIEF." The Aerospace Corporation, August 2025. https://csps.aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2025-08/FY26BudgetBrief_20250805.pdf

9. Stone, Mike. "Pentagon Advances Golden Dome Missile Defense With New Space Force Contracts." Reuters via U.S. News & World Report, November 25, 2025. https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2025-11-25/pentagon-advances-golden-dome-missile-defense-with-new-space-force-contracts

10. Machi, Vivienne. "USSF Awards Initial Golden Dome Contracts, But Details Scarce." Aviation Week, November 25, 2025. https://aviationweek.com/defense/missile-defense-weapons/ussf-awards-initial-golden-dome-contracts-details-scarce

11. Mathieson, Michelle (interviewed). "Here's the role that space-based interceptors will play in Golden Dome." Breaking Defense, July 31, 2025. https://breakingdefense.com/2025/07/heres-the-role-that-space-based-interceptors-will-play-in-golden-dome/

12. Wilson, Connie. "Golden Dome Thrusts Space-Based Interceptors Back into Spotlight." National Defense Magazine, October 7, 2025. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2025/10/7/golden-dome-thrusts-space-based-interceptors-back-into-spotlight

13. Tingley, Joseph. "Space-Based Missile Interceptors For Golden Dome Being Tested By Northrop." The War Zone, July 22, 2025. https://www.twz.com/space/space-based-missile-interceptors-for-golden-dome-being-tested-by-northrop

14. "Golden Dome." Northrop Grumman, October 6, 2025. https://www.northropgrumman.com/what-we-do/missile-defense/golden-dome

15. Insinna, Valerie. "How industry is lining up for big Golden Dome business." Breaking Defense, August 9, 2025. https://breakingdefense.com/2025/08/how-industry-is-lining-up-for-big-golden-dome-business/

16. Tingley, Joseph. "Lockheed To Test Golden Dome Space-Based Missile Interceptor In Orbit By 2028." The War Zone, October 21, 2025. https://www.twz.com/space/lockheed-to-test-golden-dome-space-based-missile-interceptor-in-orbit-by-2028

17. "Golden Dome for America." Lockheed Martin. Accessed November 30, 2025. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/missile-defense/golden-dome-missile-defense.html

18. "Lockheed Martin Prepares Space-Based Interceptor for 2028 Under Golden Dome Initiative." Army Recognition, August 5, 2025. https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/army-news/2025/lockheed-martin-prepares-space-based-interceptor-for-2028-under-golden-dome-initiative

19. "Lockheed Martin targets 2028 space interceptor test for US Golden Dome program." Army Recognition, October 2025. https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/army-news/2025/lockheed-martin-targets-2028-space-interceptor-test-for-us-golden-dome-program

20. "Lockheed Martin plans on-orbit missile interceptor demo by 2028 for Golden Dome initiative." Defence Industry Europe, October 22, 2025. https://defence-industry.eu/lockheed-martin-plans-on-orbit-missile-interceptor-demo-by-2028-for-golden-dome-initiative/

21. Rein, Lauren. "Space-based missile-killing Golden Dome tech aims for crucial test before Trump leaves office: Lockheed Martin." Fox News, August 6, 2025. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lockheed-martin-test-missile-killing-satellite-2028

22. Erwin, Sandra. "Lockheed Martin targets 2028 demo of space-based missile interceptors." SpaceNews, August 5, 2025. https://spacenews.com/lockheed-martin-targets-2028-demo-of-space-based-missile-interceptors/

23. Erwin, Sandra. "Startup takes on space-based missile defense — with its own cash." SpaceNews, October 22, 2025. https://spacenews.com/startup-takes-on-space-based-missile-defense-with-its-own-cash/

24. Cinnamon, Ian. "Apex Set to Launch Commercial Interceptor Demo Next Year." Payload Space, October 22, 2025. https://payloadspace.com/apex-set-to-launch-commercial-interceptor-demo-next-year/

25. Albon, Courtney. "Startup Apex Plans Golden Dome Demo with Launch Set for 2026." Air & Space Forces Magazine, October 22, 2025. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/startup-apex-space-based-interceptor-demo-2026/

26. "Project Shadow." Apex Space. Accessed November 30, 2025. https://www.apexspace.com/project-shadow

27. "Apex Launches Project Shadow: America's First Commercially-Led, On-Orbit Space-Based Interceptor Demonstration." Apex Space (Press Release via PR Newswire), October 22, 2025. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/apex-launches-project-shadow-americas-first-commercially-led-on-orbit-space-based-interceptor-demonstration-302590773.html

28. "Inside Golden Dome: The 5 Latest Insights for GovCons." GovCon Wire, November 2025. https://www.govconwire.com/articles/golden-dome-five-essential-insights-shield-lockheed

29. Chomsky, Martin. "U.S. Space Force awards initial prototype deals for Golden Dome's planned space based interceptors." Defence Industry Europe, November 25, 2025. https://defence-industry.eu/u-s-space-force-awards-initial-prototype-deals-for-golden-domes-planned-space-based-interceptors/

30. Tingley, Brett. "Space Force's Golden Dome chief says space-based missile interceptors are possible today. 'We have proven every element of the physics.'" Space.com, July 23, 2025. https://www.space.com/space-exploration/satellites/space-forces-golden-dome-chief-says-space-based-missile-interceptors-are-possible-today-we-have-proven-every-element-of-the-physics

31. Hitchens, Theresa. "Space Force won't say who got money to start developing orbital interceptors." Defense One, November 26, 2025. https://www.defenseone.com/business/2025/11/space-force-wont-say-who-got-money-start-developing-orbital-interceptors/409823/

 

A Bio-Inspired Whisker Sensor toward Underwater Flow Sensing in Darkness and Turbidity

Bio-Inspired Whisker Sensors Promise Enhanced Underwater Navigation for Autonomous Vehicles

BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

Researchers at Zhejiang University have developed a biomimetic whisker sensor that could significantly improve underwater navigation and target detection for unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) in turbid and dark conditions where traditional optical and acoustic systems fail. The sensor demonstrates exceptional sensitivity (0.27 mN detection limit), durability (stable through 10,000 cycles), and directional discrimination capabilities, offering a scalable solution for flow-based sensing inspired by seal whiskers.

Revolutionary Approach to Underwater Sensing

The challenge of navigating autonomous underwater vehicles in environments where visibility and acoustic performance degrade has prompted researchers to look toward nature for solutions. A team led by Professor Huan Hu at Zhejiang University's ZJUI Institute has successfully developed a whisker sensor that mimics the extraordinary hydrodynamic sensing capabilities of harbor seals, which can detect water disturbances as subtle as 245 micrometers per second.

The innovation addresses critical limitations in existing underwater sensing technologies. While traditional strain gauge-based sensors offer affordability but limited precision, and doped silicon sensors provide higher sensitivity at the cost of complex manufacturing and packaging challenges, the new design strikes a balance by embedding high-gauge-factor silicon strain gauges within a flexible polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) base integrated with 3D-printed whisker structures.

Technical Performance and Validation

The sensor's performance metrics demonstrate significant advances over previous approaches. Static bending tests revealed linear force-resistance relationships with sensitivities reaching +483.63 Ω/N and −527.10 Ω/N for the primary sensing axes, while orthogonal sensors showed minimal cross-axis coupling at −10.34 Ω/N and −3.68 Ω/N. This orthogonal arrangement enables both distance estimation and directional discrimination—critical capabilities for wake tracking and target localization.

Durability testing proved particularly impressive, with the sensor maintaining performance through 10,000 loading cycles with drift rates below 2 parts per million per cycle. The cumulative offset after this extended testing remained under 2%, indicating robust long-term reliability essential for extended deployment on autonomous platforms.

Underwater flow experiments conducted in silicone oil validated the sensor's ability to detect and characterize dipole flow fields across frequencies from 1 to 50 Hz with exceptional accuracy. The system demonstrated frequency tracking with less than 0.09 Hz maximum error and R² values exceeding 0.999992, confirming precise temporal resolution across the operational bandwidth.

Spatial Discrimination and Directional Sensing

The sensor's spatial selectivity represents a key advancement for practical applications. Longitudinal distance tests showed signal amplitude decay patterns consistent with hydrodynamic theory, with effective operational range extending to approximately 40-50 mm before reaching the noise floor. More significantly, transverse offset experiments revealed sharp spatial selectivity, with amplitude peaks at zero offset and symmetric decay within 15-20 cm, enabling high-resolution source localization.

The directional response characteristics demonstrate the sensor's ability to discriminate between longitudinal and transverse flow components. Channels aligned with the transverse direction exhibited peak amplitudes of approximately 1.41 V compared to 0.56 V for longitudinal channels when the source was centered, indicating preferential sensitivity axes that could be exploited for trajectory reconstruction.

Biological Inspiration and Design Philosophy

The sensor design draws directly from marine mammal biology. Harbor seals possess specialized whisker structures with unique asymmetric, wavy profiles that suppress vortex-induced vibrations while maintaining sensitivity to hydrodynamic disturbances. This allows seals to track fish by detecting vortex wakes that persist minutes after the prey has passed—a capability that has long fascinated researchers seeking to replicate it artificially.

The research team's approach simplifies the complex biological system while retaining its essential functional characteristics. By using standard silicon strain gauges embedded in a flexible polymer matrix, the design achieves manufacturability and scalability advantages over previous biomimetic sensors that relied on more exotic materials or fabrication processes.

Broader Research Context

This work fits within a rapidly expanding field of biomimetic flow sensing research. Recent comprehensive reviews have documented the evolution of artificial hair flow sensors, noting ongoing challenges in balancing sensitivity, durability, and manufacturing complexity. Traditional approaches have included piezoresistive MEMS devices, piezoelectric sensors, and capacitive designs, each with distinct advantages and limitations.

Parallel research efforts have explored alternative implementations, including triboelectric whisker sensor arrays for real-time motion sensing and advanced hydrodynamic sensors with multidirectional perception capabilities. However, many previous designs have struggled with packaging complexity, environmental robustness, or calibration challenges that limit practical deployment.

The Zhejiang University design addresses several of these persistent issues through its simplified packaging approach and demonstrated long-term stability. The use of PDMS encapsulation provides both mechanical flexibility and waterproofing, while the embedded strain gauges remain protected yet mechanically coupled to the whisker structure.

Applications and Future Development

The implications for autonomous underwater vehicle operations are substantial. In coastal waters, harbors, and other environments where suspended sediments create turbidity, or in deep-water operations beyond the photic zone, flow-based sensing could provide navigation and obstacle detection capabilities when optical systems become ineffective. Similarly, in cluttered underwater environments or near-bottom operations where acoustic reflections create challenging conditions, passive flow sensing offers a complementary or alternative sensing modality.

The researchers identified several directions for future development, including noise reduction to extend detection range and sensitivity, optimization of array topologies for enhanced spatial coverage, and integration of multiple sensors for trajectory tracking and wake following applications. The demonstrated scalability of the fabrication process suggests that sensor arrays could be manufactured cost-effectively for deployment across UUV platforms.

Strategic Implications

The development of reliable, robust flow sensing capabilities could influence UUV design and operational concepts. Passive sensing systems offer advantages in covert operations by eliminating acoustic emissions, while the demonstrated frequency response characteristics suggest potential for detecting biological targets (swimming animals) as well as mechanical disturbances from other vessels or vehicles.

For environmental monitoring applications, arrays of these sensors could provide detailed measurements of water flow patterns, turbulence characteristics, and hydrodynamic disturbances in ecologically sensitive areas. The long-term stability demonstrated in testing suggests suitability for extended deployments in monitoring networks.

The research represents a significant step toward practical implementation of biologically inspired flow sensing, bridging the gap between laboratory demonstration and field-deployable technology. As autonomous underwater systems become increasingly important for military, commercial, and scientific applications, innovations in sensing capabilities that extend operational envelopes into challenging environments will prove increasingly valuable.

---

Sources

1. Hang, Z., Xiong, D., Xie, P., & Hu, H. (2025). A Bio-Inspired Whisker Sensor toward Underwater Flow Sensing in Darkness and Turbidity. ZJUI Institute, Zhejiang University. [Uploaded document]

2. Zhang, L., Hang, Z., & Hu, H. (2025). Bio-inspired artificial hair flow sensors: a comprehensive review of design, fabrication, enhancements, and applications. Microsystems & Nanoengineering, 11(1), 88.

3. Dehnhardt, G., Mauck, B., & Bleckmann, H. (1998). Seal whiskers detect water movements. Nature, 394(6690), 235–236. https://doi.org/10.1038/28303

4. Dehnhardt, G., Mauck, B., Hanke, W., & Bleckmann, H. (2001). Hydrodynamic trail-following in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Science, 293(5527), 102–104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1060514

5. Hanke, W., Witte, M., Miersch, L., et al. (2010). Harbor seal vibrissa morphology suppresses vortex-induced vibrations. Journal of Experimental Biology, 213(15), 2665–2672. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.043216

6. Liu, G., Xue, Q., & Zheng, X. (2019). Phase-difference on seal whisker surface induces hairpin vortices in the wake to suppress force oscillation. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 14(6), 066001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ab3d5f

7. Geng, B., Xue, Q., Xu, Z., et al. (2025). Biomimetic seal whisker sensors for high-sensitivity wake detection and localization. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 20(3), 036013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ad2620

8. Liu, B., Dong, B., Jin, H., et al. (2025). Deep-Learning-Assisted Triboelectric Whisker Sensor Array for Real-Time Motion Sensing of Unmanned Underwater Vehicle. Advanced Materials Technologies, 10(3), 2401053. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202401053

9. Wang, S., Liu, J., Liu, B., et al. (2023). Potential applications of whisker sensors in marine science and engineering: A review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(11), 2108. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112108

10. Dai, H., Zhang, C., Hu, H., et al. (2024). Biomimetic hydrodynamic sensor with whisker array architecture and multidirectional perception ability. Advanced Science, 11(38), 2405276. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202405276

11. Tian, B., Li, H. F., Yang, H., et al. (2018). A MEMS SOI-based piezoresistive fluid flow sensor. Review of Scientific Instruments, 89(2), 025001. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5001141

12. Yang, S., & Lu, N. (2013). Gauge factor and stretchability of silicon-on-polymer strain gauges. Sensors, 13(7), 8577–8594. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130708577

13. Han, J.-H., Min, S. J., Lee, E.-S., Kim, J. H., & Min, N. K. (2023). Half-bridge silicon strain gauges with arc-shaped piezoresistors. Sensors, 23(20), 8390. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23208390

A Bio-Inspired Whisker Sensor toward Underwater Flow Sensing in Darkness and Turbidity

Zheyi Hang, Denghan Xiong, Pengo Xie, Huan Hu

Underwater flow sensing is critical for unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) and environmental monitoring, yet existing sensors often suffer from low responsiveness, high detection thresholds, limited directional discrimination, complex packaging, and poor long-term stability, especially for navigation and target perception in turbid and cluttered waters. Previous solutions based on traditional strain gauges with limited detection accuracy or doped silicon sensors with limited detection height have shown feasibility but still face challenges in scalability, robustness under harsh aquatic conditions, and calibration complexity. This work presents a bio-inspired whisker sensor that provides a balanced solution by embedding high-gauge-factor silicon strain gauges into a flexible PDMS base, mimicking seal whiskers to offer both high sensitivity and simplified packaging. The device exhibits a linear force-resistance response with a limit of detection of 0.27 mN, maintains stability after 10,000 loading cycles, and shows minimal offset drift of less than 2 percent. It also demonstrates frequency matching in underwater dipole tests with clear longitudinal and transverse spatial response patterns. These results indicate a robust and scalable route for underwater flow sensing on UUV platforms in practical deployments.

Comments:	5 pages, 10 figures, submitted to arXiv
Subjects:	Signal Processing (eess.SP)
Cite as:	arXiv:2511.22353 [eess.SP]
	(or arXiv:2511.22353v1 [eess.SP] for this version)
	https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.22353

Submission history

From: Denghan Xiong [view email]
[v1] Thu, 27 Nov 2025 11:45:32 UTC (2,799 KB)

 

Türkiye’s Kizilelma Fighter Drone Executes First Air to Air BVR Kill

Türkiye’s Kizilelma Fighter Drone Executes First Air to Air Strike - YouTube\

Turkey's Kızılelma Claims First Autonomous BVR Air-to-Air Kill

Radar-Guided Engagement Marks Leap Beyond Previous Infrared-Homing UAV Intercepts

Turkey has achieved what appears to be the first autonomous beyond-visual-range air-to-air engagement by an unmanned combat aircraft, executing a capability fundamentally more complex than previous UAV air-to-air demonstrations and marking a significant milestone in the evolution toward autonomous air superiority systems.

On November 30, 2025, Baykar announced that its Bayraktar Kızılelma unmanned combat air vehicle successfully destroyed a jet-powered aerial target using an indigenously developed Gökdoğan beyond-visual-range missile over the Black Sea near Sinop. The engagement employed Aselsan's MURAD AESA radar to guide TÜBİTAK SAGE's Gökdoğan missile against a high-speed jet-powered target, demonstrating an end-to-end indigenous Turkish kill chain.

The BVR Distinction

The achievement represents a qualitative leap beyond previous unmanned air-to-air demonstrations. The U.S. Air Force's MQ-9 Reaper achieved the first known air-to-air kill by an unmanned aircraft in November 2017, destroying a target drone using a heat-seeking air-to-air missile, with additional successful AIM-9X Sidewinder engagements conducted in 2020 during Advanced Battle Management System testing.

However, those engagements employed infrared-homing missiles at relatively short ranges where the target's heat signature guides the weapon. True BVR interception requires platforms to carry high-power radar capable of detecting and tracking fast maneuvering targets at extended ranges, maintain continuous mid-course guidance through resilient datalinks, and generate sufficient speed and altitude to optimize missile kinematic performance—capabilities the turboprop-powered MQ-9 lacks.

The Kızılelma demonstration involved autonomous radar detection, track maintenance, and launch of an active radar-guided missile—the engagement profile of manned fighters in air superiority missions.

Test Configuration and Execution

The live-fire test followed a simulated engagement on November 19, 2025, when Kızılelma locked onto an F-16 at 25 nautical miles using its MURAD radar and conducted a simulated missile attack. The progression from simulated to live engagement occurred within days.

Five F-16 fighter jets from the 5th Main Jet Base Command in Merzifon joined Kızılelma over Sinop in formation flight demonstrating manned-unmanned teaming, while a Bayraktar Akıncı UCAV captured the engagement from the air. Turkish Air Force Commander Gen. Ziya Cemal Kadıoğlu, Combat Air Forces Commander Gen. Rafet Dalkıran, Aselsan General Manager Ahmet Akyol, and Baykar Chairman Selçuk Bayraktar monitored the strike from F-16 cockpits.

Systems Integration

The Gökdoğan missile features a range exceeding 65 kilometers, solid-fuel rocket engine, and active radar seeker. Lock-on-after-launch capability is supported through a datalink receiving target updates from the launching aircraft.

The Kızılelma has a maximum takeoff weight of 6,000 kilograms with 1,500 kilograms available for payload and an operational altitude of 35,000 feet. The production prototype incorporates the MURAD-200A AESA radar with provisions for Aselsan's KARAT-100 Infrared Search and Track system, TOYGUN-100 Electro-Optical Tracking System, and IRIS Missile Approach Warning System.

While current prototypes use Ukrainian AI-322F afterburning engines enabling near-sonic speeds, Baykar plans multiple engine configurations within 5-6 years to reduce foreign dependency.

Global Competitive Landscape

The "world first" claim faces scrutiny against competing programs at varying maturity levels. Boeing announced in November 2025 that its MQ-28 Ghost Bat would conduct AIM-120 AMRAAM firing tests in December 2025, placing Australia's program weeks behind Turkey's demonstration.

China's GJ-11 has been observed at operational airbases and flying in formation with J-20 fighters, though no live BVR missile tests have been publicly confirmed. The U.S. XQ-58 Valkyrie has demonstrated manned-unmanned teaming with F-16s and F-35s, with renderings showing AIM-120 AMRAAM configurations, though live air-to-air weapon tests have not been announced.

Different programs have demonstrated different capabilities: Kızılelma with its AESA radar has fired a radar-guided air-to-air missile at a target, while only the Chinese GJ-11, XQ-58A Valkyrie, and MQ-28A Ghost Bat have been controlled by manned aircraft in manned-unmanned teaming operations.

Strategic Implications

Turkey positions the Kızılelma to offer asymmetric advantages in contested regions including the Eastern Mediterranean, Aegean Sea, northern Iraq, and Black Sea, with operational costs of approximately $3,000-4,000 per flight hour compared to F-16's $25,000-30,000.

Export interest continues rising, with 37 countries having signed agreements with Baykar as of 2025, with strong demand from Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia. A recent Leonardo-Baykar partnership suggests potential European market opportunities.

The aircraft is designed for takeoff and landing on amphibious assault ships such as TCG Anadolu without catapult systems, providing naval force projection capabilities uncommon among unmanned fighters.

Industry Analysis

Defense analysts note that while Turkey's achievement represents genuine progress in autonomous combat systems, the global landscape involves multiple nations demonstrating various aspects of unmanned air combat capability at different stages.

Future milestones will likely involve increasingly complex manned-unmanned teaming maneuvers with comprehensive mission execution rather than individual capability demonstrations. The progression from radar lock (simulated) to radar-guided kill (live) to multi-aircraft collaborative engagements represents the likely developmental trajectory.

The demonstration confirms that autonomous systems can execute high-fidelity kill chains independently—a capability previously exclusive to human fighter pilots—though questions remain about performance in contested electromagnetic environments and against modern countermeasures.

---

Sources

1. Naval News. "Unmanned Fighter Jet Bayraktar KIZILELMA Hits Target in First Air-to-Air Test-Firing." November 30, 2025. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/11/turkiyes-unmanned-fighter-jet-bayraktar-kizilelma-hits-target-at-first-air-to-air-test-firing/

2. Wikipedia. "Bayraktar Kızılelma." Accessed December 1, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayraktar_Kızılelma

3. Defence Security Asia. "Bayraktar Kızılelma Makes History: Turkey Becomes First Nation to Conduct BVR Air-to-Air Missile Kill with Autonomous UCAV." November 30, 2025. https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/kizilelma-ucav-first-bvr-missile-test-gokdogan-murad-aesa-turkey-air-combat/

4. International Defence Analysis. "Turkiye's Kizilelma Makes History with Successful Air-to-Air Capability Test." November 30, 2025. https://internationaldefenceanalysis.com/turkiyes-kizilelma-makes-history-with-successful-air-to-air-capability-test/

5. TURDEF. "Bayraktar KIZILELMA Makes Historic BVR Air-to-Air Strike." November 30, 2025. https://turdef.com/article/bayraktar-kizilelma-makes-historic-bvr-air-to-air-strike

6. Flight Global. "Baykar Kizilelma UCAV conducts simulated F-16 shoot-down with BVR missile in Turkish air force trials." November 23, 2025. https://www.flightglobal.com/military-uavs/baykar-kizilelma-conducts-simulated-f-16-shoot-down-in-turkish-trials/165475.article

7-11. [Additional MQ-28 Ghost Bat sources]

12. Wikipedia. "Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat." Accessed December 1, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_MQ-28_Ghost_Bat

13. The Aviationist. "Boeing's MQ-28A Ghost Bat Will Fire AIM-120 AMRAAM in December." November 20, 2025. https://theaviationist.com/2025/11/20/mq-28a-to-fire-aim-120-in-december/

14. Wikipedia. "Hongdu GJ-11." Accessed December 1, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hongdu_GJ-11

15. Wikipedia. "Kratos XQ-58 Valkyrie." Accessed December 1, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kratos_XQ-58_Valkyrie

16. The Aviationist. "Turkey's Kizilelma UCAV Shoots Down Target Drone with Gökdoğan Air-to-Air Missile." November 30, 2025. https://theaviationist.com/2025/11/30/turkeys-kizilelma-gokdogan-live-fire/

17. The Aviationist. "Turkey Test Fires Gökdoğan and Bozdoğan Air-to-Air Missiles." October 23, 2025. https://theaviationist.com/2025/10/23/turkey-gokdogan-bozdogan-aams/

18. TÜBİTAK SAGE. "GÖKDOĞAN - Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Missile." November 28, 2024. https://www.sage.tubitak.gov.tr/en/air-air-missiles/gokdogan/

19. Missile Threat. "MQ-9 Reaper Scored Air-to-Air Kill in 2017." September 21, 2018. https://missilethreat.csis.org/mq-9-reaper-scored-air-to-air-kill-in-2017/

20. The War Zone. "MQ-9 Reaper, Howitzer, Rocket Toting F-16 All Shoot Down Mock Cruise Missiles In Huge Test." September 11, 2020. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/36345/mq-9-reaper-howitzer-rocket-toting-f-16-all-shoot-down-mock-cruise-missiles-in-huge-test