 |
| Northrop Grumman USAF RQ-4A Global Hawk |
Focus on NAS Sigonella: What is the status of the US Global Hawk and Triton fleet in Sicily? – itamilradar
Sigonella's High-Altitude Crisis: Global Hawk and Triton Fleet Faces Uncertain Future After April 9 Incident
The Sigonella Anchor: America's Mediterranean ISR Hub Under Pressure
Naval Air Station Sigonella, perched on Sicily's eastern coast, functions as the primary forward operating base for U.S. high-altitude reconnaissance operations spanning the Mediterranean basin, the Black Sea, and the volatile Persian Gulf. For the U.S. Air Force and Navy, Sigonella has served as a critical staging point for decades, hosting everything from crewed intelligence aircraft to the Navy's newest maritime surveillance platforms. Today, that strategic role faces unprecedented scrutiny following the unexplained disappearance of a $200 million MQ-4C Triton on April 9.
According to open-source flight tracking data analyzed by regional monitoring organizations, the Triton—registration 169804, callsign VVPE804—departed Sigonella for a routine three-hour maritime surveillance mission over the Strait of Hormuz. The aircraft was operating at its standard cruise altitude of 52,000 feet when, without warning, it transmitted two emergency transponder codes in rapid succession: first squawk code 7400 (loss of communications link with ground control), followed immediately by 7700 (general emergency). Within approximately 15 minutes, the drone descended from 52,000 feet to below 10,000 feet and disappeared from all civilian tracking systems.
The U.S. Navy has not issued an official statement regarding the aircraft's fate. Neither U.S. Central Command, Naval Air Forces, nor the Chief of Information office has confirmed loss of the aircraft, the cause of the emergency, or whether the Triton recovered safely at an alternate base. This official silence, maintained 24 hours after the incident, mirrors the communication posture following the June 2019 shootdown of an RQ-4A BAMS-D Global Hawk by Iranian forces over nearly identical waters.
The Operator's Dilemma: Understaffed, Aging, at Risk
Based on publicly available flight tracking data, the current Global Hawk and Triton inventory at Sigonella numbers approximately four aircraft with regular operational deployment patterns. The U.S. Air Force's RQ-4B Global Hawk contingent appears to comprise two airframes: registration 11-2046 and 09-2039 (callsign FORTE10). The last confirmed tracking data for 11-2046 dates to February 2, 2026, when it completed a 24-hour surveillance mission over the Black Sea. Aircraft 09-2039 (FORTE10) has shown more recent activity, with confirmed operations over the Black Sea as recently as February 21, 2026, and sporadic missions documented throughout the winter months and into early spring.
The Navy's Triton contingent comprised at minimum two operational aircraft prior to April 9: registration 169661, last tracked on March 21, 2026, during Persian Gulf operations, and 169804—the missing aircraft. The loss of 169804 effectively reduces the Navy's forward-deployed Triton capability by 50 percent, a strategic impact equivalent to the loss of a satellite constellation node rather than a single airframe.
This operational tempo masks a fundamental vulnerability: the HALE fleet at Sigonella is chronically undermanned and underresourced. Global Hawk operations in the USAF inventory have been under sustained pressure for budget reductions. In late 2024 and early 2025, the Air Force proposed retiring 21 of its 35 RQ-4 Global Hawks as newer MQ-4C Tritons entered the inventory. The Navy, meanwhile, has cut its planned Triton acquisition from an original 70 aircraft to 27—a decisive retreat from the platform's initial vision, driven in part by the 2019 Iranian shootdown of the BAMS-D prototype and persistent concerns about high-altitude platform vulnerability in contested environments.
The Precedent: June 2019 and the BAMS-D Engagement
The parallels between the April 9, 2026 incident and the June 20, 2019 shootdown of RQ-4A BAMS-D registration 166510 are impossible to ignore. In that earlier incident, the BAMS-D—a maritime-optimized RQ-4 derivative that served as the test bed for the MQ-4C Triton program—was fired upon by Iran's Sevom Khordad (Third of Khordad) surface-to-air missile system while operating near the Strait of Hormuz. The missile, a domestically produced system believed to be derived from Russia's Buk-M2E architecture, successfully engaged the drone at high altitude. The BAMS-D fell into international waters; wreckage was recovered by Iranian forces.
The 2019 engagement was unambiguous: a direct hit, an explosion captured on infrared video, and immediate public claims of responsibility from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The Trump administration had prepared retaliatory strikes, with aircraft already airborne, before the president reversed the decision. The incident marked the first successful shootdown of a U.S. Navy high-altitude surveillance platform by a near-peer competitor and created a lasting operational psychology around the vulnerability of undefended, high-altitude platforms in contested littoral zones.
The April 9 incident differs operationally but resonates strategically. Unlike the 2019 engagement—characterized by a clean, immediate kinetic event—the April 9 disappearance is shrouded in ambiguity. The aircraft declared emergency, descended rapidly, and vanished. Possible explanations range from catastrophic mechanical failure to electronic warfare jamming, GPS spoofing, or direct military engagement. Iran has made no public claims. The U.S. has offered no official explanation. This ambiguity may prove more destabilizing than the clarity of 2019.
Three Theaters, One Stretched Fleet
The strategic value of the Sigonella HALE fleet lies not in the raw number of airframes but in their geographic reach and persistence. From Sigonella, a single Global Hawk can depart, transit across the central Mediterranean, Greece, and Bulgaria, and operate over the Black Sea for extended periods before returning—a round-trip mission spanning well over 24 hours. The Triton, optimized for maritime operations, can cover the entire Mediterranean basin and extend operations into the Red Sea, the Arabian Peninsula, and the Persian Gulf.
NATO's Eastern Flank: The Black Sea has been the primary focus of USAF RQ-4B operations since early 2022, coinciding with Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Global Hawks monitor Russian naval activity in Sevastopol, track surface-to-air missile deployments along the Crimean coast, and provide intelligence that flows—through established channels—to Ukrainian forces and NATO allies. Global Hawk missions over the Black Sea are conducted in international airspace, but the proximity to Russian air defense systems and the sensitivity of the region create persistent operational risk.
The Mediterranean and North Africa: The MQ-4C Triton, with its advanced synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and maritime-surveillance payload, has been tasked with monitoring Russian weapons shipments transiting the Mediterranean from Syria to Libya, tracking Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) naval movements, and providing overwatch for U.S. Navy operations in the Eastern Mediterranean. A new hangar facility, completed at Sigonella in March 2024, was specifically constructed to support MQ-4C rotations and maintenance—a significant infrastructure investment predicated on sustained platform availability.
The Persian Gulf and Middle East: The disappearance of 169804 occurred while the aircraft was conducting routine maritime ISR over the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most strategically critical chokepoints. The mission profile—extended loitering over Persian Gulf shipping lanes, Iranian coastal facilities, and maritime approach routes—has been a cornerstone of U.S. naval ISR for nearly two decades. The aircraft's loss, if confirmed, removes one of only two Navy Tritons forward-deployed for such operations.
Mechanism of Loss: The Ambiguity Problem
The exact cause of the April 9 incident remains unknown, and each plausible scenario carries different operational and strategic implications.
Mechanical Failure: The RQ-4 Global Hawk and MQ-4C Triton are mature platforms with tens of thousands of accumulated flight hours. Catastrophic failure during normal cruise is statistically rare, though not impossible. The Rolls-Royce AE3007H turbofan engine powering the Triton is reliable; the airframe design is proven. However, extended high-altitude operations at 52,000 feet impose severe environmental stresses, and maintenance schedules in austere forward locations can be unforgiving.
Electronic Warfare and GPS Spoofing: Iran has demonstrated persistent investment in electronic warfare and GPS denial capabilities. In 2011, Iran claimed to have spoofed the GPS systems of a CIA RQ-170 Sentinel stealth drone, causing it to land intact in Iran. While the veracity of that claim remains contested, Iran's jamming and spoofing capabilities have only matured since. If the Triton's satellite communications link (SATCOM) was disrupted or spoofed, the aircraft might have entered an uncontrolled descent, unable to receive corrective inputs from ground control. The aircraft's lost-link recovery procedure—autonomous navigation and descent—may have been compromised if positioning data was corrupted.
Kinetic Engagement: The possibility of Iranian air defense engagement cannot be excluded. Iran's Sevom Khordad system, which successfully shot down the BAMS-D in 2019, remains operational. The system has a demonstrated ceiling of approximately 85,000 feet, sufficient to engage aircraft operating at 52,000 feet. Subsequent Iranian air defense acquisitions—including the Russian-origin Bavar-373 system—introduce additional threats. However, engaging a high-altitude target at the Triton's cruise altitude requires precise radar guidance and would generate telemetry evidence. Neither the U.S. nor Iran has issued statements claiming engagement.
Operational Implications: The Coverage Gap
The loss or extended unavailability of a single MQ-4C Triton has immediate operational consequences. The Navy operates a small fleet of these aircraft—only 27 planned for the entire service, with a handful forward-deployed at any given time. If 169804 is confirmed lost, the Mediterranean-based Triton inventory drops from a minimum two aircraft to one, creating a coverage gap for maritime ISR missions across the Mediterranean, Red Sea, and Persian Gulf.
This gap is not easily filled. The P-8A Poseidon, the Navy's crewed maritime patrol aircraft, can provide complementary coverage but operates at lower altitude and with greater risk in contested environments. Sigonella-based P-8As have been active in the Eastern Mediterranean and Persian Gulf, but P-8A sortie rates are lower, endurance is more limited, and crew fatigue factors constrain 24/7 persistent operations. The Triton was designed to provide precisely that kind of persistent, 24+ hour loiter capability that crewed platforms cannot sustain.
For NATO operations, the loss has less immediate impact. The U.S. Air Force maintains two Global Hawks at Sigonella, and additional RQ-4s are stationed at forward bases in Germany and Turkey. However, the incident raises questions about the operational sustainability of the entire HALE fleet in contested littoral environments. If a $200 million Triton can disappear under ambiguous circumstances, what changes to operational procedures, routing, and risk assessment will follow?
The Ceasefire Context: A Dangerous Window
The timing of the April 9 incident is strategically consequential. Two days prior, on April 7, the United States and Iran announced a fragile two-week ceasefire following weeks of escalatory military exchanges. That ceasefire is contingent on the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the resumption of international commerce through one of the world's most critical energy chokepoints. Global maritime traffic through the Strait had collapsed to below 10 percent of normal volumes amid the earlier hostilities.
The disappearance of a Triton conducting surveillance over the Strait during this ceasefire period introduces acute strategic volatility. If the aircraft was brought down by Iranian action—whether kinetic or electronic—the incident could be characterized as a ceasefire violation, justifying escalatory U.S. response. If the loss was mechanical, the U.S. will likely maintain strategic ambiguity to avoid triggering Iranian claims of responsibility or celebrating propaganda victories. The absence of clarity becomes itself a strategic factor.
Naval commanders in the region, monitoring shipping traffic and Iranian naval activity, will necessarily assume worst-case risk models until additional information emerges. That assumption may translate into operational decisions—repositioning assets, increasing escort operations, adjusting Triton patrol patterns—that themselves escalate the environment.
The Acquisition Crisis: Why 27 Instead of 70?
The Triton's current fleet plan—27 aircraft total for the entire U.S. Navy, with only a handful available for forward deployment at any given time—reflects a strategic retreat from the platform's original vision. When the MQ-4C program was initiated, planners envisioned a fleet of 70 aircraft, providing genuine persistence across multiple geographic regions simultaneously. That plan was scrapped following the 2019 BAMS-D shootdown and the mounting recognition that undefended, high-altitude platforms face genuine vulnerability to peer and near-peer adversaries.
The 27-aircraft plan assumes a rotational deployment model: aircraft cycle through maintenance, training, and forward operations on a scheduled basis. Forward deployment strength at any given moment is typically two to three aircraft. When one is lost or unavailable, the operational capacity is cut in half. This structure was sustainable when Triton operations were considered low-risk; post-2019, the risk calculus changed, but the acquisition numbers did not adjust accordingly.
The Air Force faces similar pressures. While it has begun scaling back Global Hawk numbers, the platform retains operational utility in lower-threat environments, particularly over the Black Sea where Russian air defenses are potent but not optimized for high-altitude engagements at extended ranges. However, the long-term viability of the RQ-4 fleet is increasingly uncertain. The platform was designed in the 1990s for a threat environment that no longer exists. Peer competitors now field integrated air defense systems (IADS) with sophisticated radar, precision guidance, and layered coverage that can defeat platforms operating at altitudes once considered sanctuary.
The Path Forward: Procedural Changes and Strategic Realignment
In the immediate term, expect the U.S. military to implement operational adjustments at Sigonella and across the broader CENTCOM and EUCOM theaters. These are likely to include:
Altered Flight Patterns and Routing: HALE missions may be rerouted to avoid proximity to Iranian air defense systems. Patrol boxes may shift farther from the Strait of Hormuz and Iranian airspace, trading ISR coverage quality for risk reduction. The strategic value of such platforms depends partly on proximate intelligence; risk mitigation may degrade that value.
Enhanced Escort and Support Operations: Forward air defense assets—AWACS, electronic warfare aircraft, and potentially tactical air cover—may be tasked to support HALE sorties. This increases sortie costs and operational complexity while reducing the "standalone" appeal of autonomous high-altitude operations.
Accelerated Sensor Technology Transitions: The Navy will likely accelerate its evaluation of alternative ISR architectures—including space-based synthetic aperture radar systems, over-the-horizon drone swarms, and advanced manned platforms such as the P-8A. None of these offers a perfect substitute for the persistence and coverage of a Triton, but collectively they may reduce dependence on a small fleet of vulnerable platforms.
Diplomatic and Military Messaging: The U.S. military will need to carefully calibrate its public narrative around the April 9 incident. If it remains silent indefinitely, analysts will assume worst-case explanations. If it issues a statement attributing loss to Iranian action without irrefutable evidence, it risks escalation. If it claims mechanical failure unconvincingly, it loses credibility with allies and adversaries alike.
Broader Questions: The Future of Undefended High-Altitude Operations
The April 9 incident is emblematic of a larger challenge confronting the U.S. military. For three decades, American ISR operations have proceeded on the assumption of air superiority or, at minimum, the absence of credible air defense threats in the operating areas. That assumption is no longer tenable. Russia, China, and Iran have invested heavily in integrated air defense systems, and smaller states have access to advanced air defense technology through international arms markets and state sponsors.
Undefended, high-altitude platforms—whether RQ-4 Global Hawks, MQ-4C Tritons, or future HALE variants—are no longer sanctuary assets. They can be engaged. They can be lost. The strategic benefit must be weighed against genuine operational risk.
For Sigonella, the incident marks a watershed moment. The base will continue to serve as a critical ISR hub, but the composition of that ISR capability is likely to shift. Additional Triton aircraft may be forward-deployed to offset risk through numerical redundancy, or the Navy may accelerate diversification into alternative platforms. The Global Hawk fleet may receive enhanced support assets or may be repositioned to lower-threat theaters. Italy's political role as host nation will gain salience; Rome will likely demand greater transparency about operations conducted from Sigonella and may impose constraints on ISR sorties that carry elevated risk of Iranian engagement.
Historical Precedent: The U-2 Shadow and the Loss of Sanctuary
The April 9 incident invites historical comparison to a moment that fundamentally reshaped American ISR strategy: the shootdown of pilot Gary Powers' U-2 over the Soviet Union on May 1, 1960. The parallels are instructive, and the differences equally revealing.
When Eisenhower authorized the U-2 overflights of Soviet territory, the underlying assumption was operational sanctuary through altitude. The aircraft operated at approximately 70,000 feet—a ceiling believed to be beyond the reach of existing Soviet air defense systems. The intelligence value was exceptional: high-resolution imagery of Soviet ICBM deployment sites, bomber bases, and strategic facilities. The political risk seemed manageable because the platform was thought to be invulnerable.
That assumption shattered when Soviet surface-to-air missiles—specifically the S-75 Dvina (NATO designation: SA-2 Guideline)—achieved a successful engagement. The shootdown was not a mechanical failure or a navigation error. It was proof that American operational assumptions about sanctuary altitude were fatally flawed. Adversaries had closed a technological gap the U.S. believed to be unbridgeable.
The U-2 incident forced public acknowledgment and strategic recalibration. President Eisenhower faced international condemnation, had to authorize a cover story (NASA weather research aircraft) that unraveled almost immediately, and ultimately suspended overflights of Soviet territory. The incident nearly derailed the Paris summit with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev. It had geopolitical consequences far beyond the loss of a single aircraft.
Yet there was one difference that mattered operationally: Gary Powers survived. He was captured, interrogated, tried, and eventually traded back to the U.S. in 1962 in exchange for Soviet KGB Colonel Rudolf Abel. Powers became a bargaining chip, a human asset with intelligence value and negotiating leverage.
The MQ-4C Triton offers no such leverage. If registration 169804 was brought down by Iranian air defenses over the Strait of Hormuz, there is no captured pilot to ransom, no defector to interrogate, no human drama to negotiate. The aircraft is uncrewed, undefended, and ultimately expendable from a human perspective—though strategically and financially irreplaceable.
This asymmetry may explain the profound official silence surrounding the April 9 incident. The U.S. Navy has not confirmed loss. CENTCOM has not issued statements. Iran has made no claims of responsibility. In 1960, the Powers shootdown forced rapid public reckonings because a human life was at stake. Today, the ambiguity can be maintained indefinitely without triggering similar pressure for transparency.
Yet the strategic lesson is identical to what U-2 overflights taught in 1960: sanctuary altitude is an illusion. Adversaries continuously invest in air defense capabilities. What is unreachable today becomes vulnerable tomorrow. The timeline may vary—the Soviets closed the gap in a decade; Iran, with less technological sophistication but access to refined missile systems, may have taken longer—but the outcome is predictable.
The Real Parallel: Like the U-2 program post-1960, the Triton and Global Hawk fleets will likely continue operating—but fundamentally reconfigured. U-2 overflights of Soviet territory were abandoned; the aircraft transitioned to peripheral missions, reconnaissance of allied territory, and less contested geographic zones. The imagery and intelligence it provided remained valuable; the sanctuary assumption simply shifted to environments where air defense threats were manageable.
The HALE fleet will follow a similar trajectory. Global Hawks and Tritons will not disappear from Sigonella. The intelligence requirements driving these missions are real and growing. But the operational posture will change: higher-altitude operations over contested water rather than littoral proximity, rerouted transit corridors avoiding predictable patterns, more frequent aircraft rotations to reduce adversary pattern recognition, possibly enhanced escort by tactical air cover or electronic warfare assets, and almost certainly an accelerated transition to alternative ISR architectures—space-based synthetic aperture radar, drone swarms operating at medium altitude, or advanced manned platforms like the P-8A.
The one leverage the U.S. retains—that the Soviets did not have—is technological velocity. The U-2 was cutting-edge in 1960 but had no successor ready. Today, alternatives exist or are in development. The challenge is not platform vulnerability per se, but rather the strategic question of whether that vulnerability is acceptable given the intelligence value and the cost of maintaining sanctuary through operational accommodation.
The Powers shootdown taught that operational assumptions about sanctuary cannot survive contact with peer-competitor air defense development. The April 9 Triton incident reinforces that lesson. How the U.S. military responds—whether through operational realism or prolonged strategic ambiguity—will determine whether the lesson is learned or merely deferred.
Conclusion: Persistence Amid Vulnerability
The U.S. military's reliance on persistent, high-altitude ISR is not diminishing. The intelligence requirements driving Triton and Global Hawk deployments are genuine and growing. However, the operational environment has fundamentally changed. Adversaries can now contest the airspace that American drones occupy. The question is no longer whether HALE platforms are valuable—they demonstrably are—but whether they remain sustainable in a world where that value is contested by adversaries armed with capable air defense systems.
The disappearance of MQ-4C Triton registration 169804 over the Persian Gulf on April 9, 2026, is not an isolated incident. It is a data point in a longer trajectory: the gradual erosion of American ISR sanctuary, the rise of peer competition in the air domain, and the difficult choices ahead for platform acquisition, deployment posture, and operational risk tolerance. How the U.S. military responds—strategically and tactically—will shape the future of high-altitude reconnaissance operations for years to come.
Verified Sources and Citations
- The Aviationist. "MQ-4 Triton Disappears over Persian Gulf after Squawking Comms Link Loss." April 9, 2026. https://theaviationist.com/2026/04/09/mq-4-triton-disappears-over-persian-gulf/
- The War Zone (Tyler Rogoway). "Navy MQ-4C Triton's Fate Unknown After Disappearing From Flight Tracking Over Persian Gulf." April 9, 2026. https://www.twz.com/air/navy-mq-4c-tritons-fate-unknown-after-disappearing-from-flight-tracking-over-persian-gulf
- Defence Security Asia. "US Navy MQ-4C Triton 'Vanishes' Over Persian Gulf After Emergency Signal — Is US-Iran Drone Confrontation Entering a Dangerous New Phase?" April 10, 2026. https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/us-navy-mq4c-triton-vanishes-persian-gulf-emergency-signal-us-iran-drone-escalation-2026/
- Defence Security Asia. "US Navy MQ-4C Triton Vanishes Near Iran After Emergency Code: Did Tehran Just Down America's US$200 Million Spy Drone?" April 10, 2026. https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/us-navy-mq4c-triton-vanishes-near-iran-emergency-code-shot-down-strait-of-hormuz/
- MiGFlug.com Blog. "52,000 Feet, Then Gone: Triton Vanishes Near Iran." April 9, 2026. https://migflug.com/jetflights/52000-feet-then-gone-triton-vanishes-near-iran/
- The Week. "US Navy surveillance drone disappears near Iran: Was it shot down?" April 10, 2026. https://www.theweek.in/news/middle-east/2026/04/10/us-navy-surveillance-drone-disappears-near-iran-was-it-shot-down.html
- SSBCrack News. "U.S. Navy $200 Million MQ-4C Triton Drone Reportedly Crashes in Persian Gulf." April 10, 2026. https://news.ssbcrack.com/u-s-navy-200-million-mq-4c-triton-drone-reportedly-crashes-in-persian-gulf/
- Defence Industry Europe. "U.S. Navy MQ-4C Triton drone signals emergency and disappears from tracking over Persian Gulf waters." April 9, 2026. https://defence-industry.eu/u-s-navy-mq-4c-triton-drone-signals-emergency-and-disappears-from-tracking-over-persian-gulf-waters/
- ItaMilRadar. "Focus on NAS Sigonella: What is the status of the US Global Hawk and Triton fleet in Sicily?" April 10, 2026. https://www.itamilradar.com/2026/04/10/focus-on-nas-sigonella-what-is-the-status-of-the-us-global-hawk-and-triton-fleet-in-sicily/
- Army Recognition. "US RQ-4B Global Hawk Spy Drone resumes Black Sea surveillance tracking Russian missiles." October 27, 2025. https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/aerospace-news/2025/us-rq-4b-global-hawk-spy-drone-resumes-black-sea-surveillance-tracking-russian-missiles
- Army Recognition. "U.S. Deploys RQ-4B Global Hawk for Surveillance Mission Over the Black Sea." February 4, 2026. https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/aerospace-news/2026/u-s-deploys-rq-4b-global-hawk-for-surveillance-mission-over-the-black-sea
- The War Zone (Tyler Rogoway). "MQ-4C Triton Has Arrived In Europe, Could Impact Black Sea, Red Sea Operations." April 1, 2024. https://www.twz.com/air/mq-4c-tritons-have-arrived-in-europe-could-impact-black-sea-red-sea-operations
- Wikipedia. "2019 Iranian shoot-down of American drone." January 28, 2026 (Updated). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Iranian_shoot-down_of_American_drone
- Newsweek. "Iran Shot Down One of These U.S. Spy Drones, Two More Crashed, Now Navy May Only Have Two More Left." December 13, 2019. https://www.newsweek.com/iran-drone-navy-crash-two-left-1477220
- TIME. "Iran Shot Down a $176 Million U.S. Drone That Could Fly Twice as High as an Airliner." June 20, 2019. https://time.com/5611222/rq-4-global-hawk-iran-shot-down/
- The Aviationist (David Cenciotti). "All You Need To Know (And Hasn't Been Said Yet) About The Navy RQ-4A Shot Down by Iran Over The Strait of Hormuz." June 20, 2019. https://theaviationist.com/2019/06/20/all-you-need-to-know-about-the-u-s-navy-rq-4a-shot-down-by-iran-over-the-strait-of-hormuz/
- The National Interest. "A War Begins? How Iran Shot Down a U.S. RQ-4N Surveillance Drone." November 25, 2024. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/war-begins-how-iran-shot-down-us-rq-4n-surveillance-drone-63717
- Defence-UA (Defense Express). "Iran May Have Shot Down Second U.S. MQ-4C Triton Drone — In Exact Same Spot as 2019 Incident." February 26, 2026. https://en.defence-ua.com/news/iran_may_have_shot_down_second_us_mq_4c_triton_drone_in_exact_same_spot_as_2019_incident-17639.html
- USNI News (Sam LaGrone). "VIDEO: Iran Downs Navy Drone in 'Unprovoked Attack.'" June 20, 2019. https://news.usni.org/2019/06/20/iran-shoots-down-120m-navy-surveillance-drone-in-unprovoked-attack-u-s-disputes-claims-it-was-over-iranian-airspace
- U.S. Navy Official Statement. "U.S. Central Command Statement: Iranians shoot down U.S. drone." June 20, 2019. https://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=109973
- Fox News (Lucas Tomlinson). "US Navy drone shot down by Iranian missile over Strait of Hormuz in 'unprovoked attack,' central command says." June 20, 2019. https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-navy-drone-shot-down-by-iranian-missile-over-strait-of-hormuz-source
- Naval Today. "CENTCOM releases video of US Navy BAMS-D shoot down over Strait of Hormuz." June 21, 2019. https://www.navaltoday.com/2019/06/21/centcom-releases-video-of-us-navy-bams-d-shoot-down-over-strait-of-hormuz/
No comments:
Post a Comment