Saturday, May 30, 2026

SpaceX Based Eyes for the Kill Chain:


SB-AMTI and HBTSS as the Essential Sensors for Hypersonic Defense

SpaceX just won a second Golden Dome contract. This one is $4.16 billion.

May 30, 2026 Missile Defense / Space Systems

Bottom Line Up Front

Space-based Airborne Moving Target Indicator (SB-AMTI) and Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor (HBTSS) satellites are now the cornerstones of the U.S. Golden Dome missile defense architecture, primarily because hypersonic glide vehicles and advanced cruise missiles exploit precisely the coverage gaps, low-altitude blind spots, and radar-plasma-sheath effects that ground-based systems cannot overcome. SpaceX's $6.45 billion in Golden Dome contracts awarded in a single week, a $3.5 billion SDA Tracking Layer Tranche 3 build, accelerated Northrop Grumman Glide Phase Interceptor development, and validated HBTSS on-orbit demonstrations collectively signal that the Pentagon has reached a programmatic inflection point: the kill chain against the most dangerous hypersonic threats must be rooted in LEO, not on the ground or in manned aircraft.

Two converging Golden Dome programs — a $4.16 billion SpaceX airborne-tracking award and a validated HBTSS infrared sensor constellation — are reshaping how America plans to detect, track, and engage hypersonic glide vehicles and advanced cruise missiles that ground radar cannot reliably see.

WASHINGTON — In a single week that will be studied by defense planners for years, the U.S. Space Force awarded SpaceX two contracts totaling $6.45 billion for the backbone sensing and communications architecture of the Golden Dome missile defense initiative. The larger of the two, a $4.16 billion Other Transaction Authority agreement announced May 29, covers the Space-Based Airborne Moving Target Indicator program — a constellation intended to do from orbit what aging E-3 Sentry AWACS aircraft and successor E-7 Wedgetails were designed to do in contested airspace, but cannot survive to accomplish. The procurement signals a strategic conclusion long debated in the halls of the Pentagon: against the hypersonic threat environment now fielded by China and Russia, the kill chain's sensor layer must live in low Earth orbit.

The Threat That Drove the Architecture

To understand why SB-AMTI and its companion program, the Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor (HBTSS), matter, one must begin with the physics of the threat. Hypersonic glide vehicles (HGVs) such as Russia's nuclear-armed Avangard — which Moscow claims reaches speeds approaching Mach 27 — and China's operationally deployed DF-ZF, mounted on the DF-17 medium-range ballistic missile, exploit a fundamental vulnerability in legacy defense architectures. After boost, HGVs enter the atmosphere and glide at altitudes between approximately 25 and 60 kilometers. This places them below the line-of-sight of most ground-based radar networks optimized for high-arc ballistic trajectories, yet above the coverage optimized for low-altitude cruise missiles. They also maneuver unpredictably at high lateral accelerations, rendering the prediction-based intercept geometries used against ballistic missiles largely ineffective.

A 2025 NATO Science and Technology Organization study confirmed that HGVs are detectable from geostationary orbit using mid-wave infrared sensors, but also quantified the challenge: aerodynamic heating at hypersonic velocities generates strong infrared signatures, yet HGVs in the glide phase radiate significantly less intensively than a ballistic missile in boost phase. A peer-reviewed analysis circulated through academic defense journals found that a hypersonic glide vehicle in some flight states may occupy 0.1% or less of the image area of a space-based infrared sensor, requiring advanced small-target detection algorithms and high signal-to-noise performance that legacy Overhead Persistent Infrared (OPIR) satellites were simply not designed to provide. China's September 2025 test of a fractional orbital bombardment-combined HGV platform — a system blending depressed trajectory ICBMs with hypersonic boost-glide — added further urgency, demonstrating that Beijing is actively trying to compress warning timelines for U.S. homeland defense.

The radar picture is no better. During hypersonic flight at Mach 5 and above, a vehicle generates a plasma sheath that scatters and attenuates radar signals, degrading tracking quality precisely when range-rate and angle data are most critical for fire control. Ground-based radars capable of maintaining lock must be in close proximity to the threat's trajectory — a geographic constraint that largely cannot be met for attacks aimed at the American homeland from polar or southern-approach azimuths. The Long Range Discrimination Radar in Alaska, which recorded its first live ICBM-representative tracking in June 2025, partially addresses one corridor, but offers no coverage against southern-approach HGV or advanced cruise missile attack vectors.

"Space-based AMTI, I think, will probably be far and away the most capable AMTI system ever built. That doesn't mean it's going to do the entire job. There are many other systems that come into play as you do data fusion to get the bigger picture." — Air Force Secretary Troy Meink, Space Symposium, April 2026

HBTSS: From Concept to On-Orbit Validation

The HBTSS program, a joint Missile Defense Agency–Space Development Agency initiative, was conceived precisely to address the sensor gap that neither legacy OPIR satellites nor ground radar can fill. Emerging from the 2019 Missile Defense Review, HBTSS was designed to provide birth-to-death tracking of both ballistic and hypersonic threats, supplying the fire-control-quality targeting data necessary to cue a Glide Phase Interceptor — data accurate enough to generate a valid engagement solution rather than merely a broad track. The system architecture relies on medium field-of-view infrared sensors in low Earth orbit, cued by wide field-of-view SDA Tracking Layer satellites that sweep large volumes of sky for initial detection. This layered cueing architecture trades coverage for precision: WFOV satellites find the target; HBTSS acquires it with sufficient fidelity to shoot.

On February 14, 2024, a SpaceX Falcon 9 lifted six defense satellites to LEO from Cape Canaveral — two HBTSS prototypes built by L3Harris Technologies and Northrop Grumman, and four SDA Tranche 0 Tracking Layer satellites. MIT Lincoln Laboratory serves as science team lead overseeing the on-orbit demonstration campaign. By April 2025, the Missile Defense Agency confirmed that L3Harris's HBTSS satellite had met its primary program requirements, while Northrop's prototype had not yet satisfied all performance targets — giving L3Harris a significant competitive edge for follow-on production. A March 2025 MDA and U.S. Navy live demonstration provided perhaps the most consequential validation to date: HBTSS data was used to detect, track, and conduct a simulated engagement of a maneuvering hypersonic target, completing the kill chain proof of concept that program critics had long demanded before committing to production scale. According to a March 2026 statement by Space Force Vice Chief of Space Operations Gen. Michael Guetlein, this demonstration is "comparable" to legacy MDA capability.

HBTSS & SDA Tracking Layer — Program Lineage
  • Tranche 0: Four SDA WFOV satellites + two MDA HBTSS prototypes launched Feb. 14, 2024 aboard SpaceX Falcon 9. MIT Lincoln Laboratory leads science team.
  • Tranche 1: 28 tracking satellites (154 total PWSA spacecraft); first Lockheed Martin and York Space Systems launches occurred late 2025. First operational warfighting capability.
  • Tranche 2: 54 satellites (L3Harris $919M, Lockheed Martin, Sierra Space — Sierra Space passed CDR Sept. 2025). Launching late 2026. Incorporates HBTSS-derived fire control sensors.
  • Tranche 3: 72 satellites awarded Dec. 19, 2025 — Lockheed Martin ($1.1B), L3Harris ($843M), Rocket Lab ($805M), Northrop Grumman ($764M). Total value ~$3.5B. Launch target FY2029.
  • GA-EMS: Providing on-orbit mission data processing payloads for Lockheed Tranche 2 satellites; fire control tracks delivered in real time.

SB-AMTI: Retiring the AWACS in Contested Skies

While HBTSS addresses the ballistic and hypersonic tracking mission, the parallel SB-AMTI program attacks a different but related problem: the detection and continuous custody of low-flying, maneuvering airborne targets — cruise missiles, bomber formations, and unmanned systems operating at altitudes where ground radar coverage is limited by terrain masking and line-of-sight geometry. The traditional answer was the E-3 Sentry AWACS and, from 2025 onward, the planned Boeing E-7A Wedgetail. That answer is increasingly untenable.

The E-3 fleet, averaging nearly 50 years of airframe age and "barely operational" by the assessment of Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) in 2025 appropriations testimony, suffered a concrete operational loss when a USAF E-3G was destroyed in a drone and missile attack on Prince Sultan Air Base, Saudi Arabia, in March 2026. The loss renewed a debate that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had already largely resolved: E-7 Wedgetail was canceled from the FY2026 USAF baseline budget and ultimately zeroed out of the FY2027 request, despite a $2.5 billion Boeing prototype contract awarded in 2024. NATO simultaneously cancelled its E-7 procurement in November 2025, with the SAAB GlobalEye emerging as the likely Alliance replacement — a remarkable departure from decades of U.S. technological dominance in airborne early warning. The stated rationale, echoed by Hegseth and Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink: satellites cannot be shot down by A2/AD missiles, and against near-peer adversaries with advanced surface-to-air systems, manned radar platforms are operationally non-survivable in the engagement envelopes where they would need to operate.

The Space Force's Space Systems Command articulated the logic plainly in its May 29 contract announcement: "Traditional military airborne platforms to trace moving targets are confronting challenges as adversaries develop anti-access/area-denial systems," propelling the mission into the space domain. Space-based sensors are immune to the SA-400 series, the HQ-9, and their successors. They require no in-flight refueling, no crew rest cycles, no basing access agreements, and no escort fighters. A constellation of SB-AMTI satellites provides persistent global coverage irrespective of the diplomatic or kinetic situation in any given theater.

The Space Force selected nine vendors for the SB-AMTI program through an OTA framework announced at the Space Symposium in April 2026 by Secretary Meink — the individual companies and contract values withheld for national security reasons. SpaceX's $4.16 billion award on May 29 is designated as the initial production contract, with additional awards to other vendors expected over the next year to build a diverse supplier base. Col. Ryan Frazier, acting Space Force portfolio acquisition executive for Space Based Sensing and Targeting, confirmed the constellation is projected to achieve initial operational capability by 2028. The Space Force's FY2027 budget request, subject to congressional reconciliation action, includes approximately $7 billion for continued SB-AMTI expansion. The Aerospace Corporation's analysis of Golden Dome reconciliation allocations placed total target-tracking funding at $9.2 billion — the single largest programmatic line in the space sensing architecture.

Architecture Integration: The Kill Chain Problem

Neither SB-AMTI nor HBTSS alone constitutes a kill chain. The architecture that Golden Dome envisions — and that the FY2027 budget funds — is a data-fused, multi-layer system requiring tight interoperability among three distinct program families, all of which are in simultaneous development on accelerated timelines.

SDA's Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture Transport Layer provides the communications fabric: a low-latency inter-satellite link mesh, built to Link 16 and eventually tactical data link standards, that moves fire-control-quality tracks from tracking layer satellites to weapons systems in near-real time. The Tranche 1 transport layer — 126 satellites, first launches late 2025 — is being integrated with ground terminals and test systems ahead of the 2028 SB-AMTI initial operating capability date. SpaceX's $2.29 billion Space Data Network Backbone contract, awarded May 26, adds a dedicated Starshield-based secure relay layer above the SDA transport, specifically designed to handle the higher-classification data flows associated with homeland missile defense. The SB-AMTI contract explicitly requires SpaceX to integrate its AMTI sensors with this data transport backbone, treating the two programs as a coupled system-of-systems rather than independent acquisitions.

At the shooter end, the Glide Phase Interceptor program has experienced its own turbulent trajectory. After a near-catastrophic funding reduction in the FY2025 defense budget that threatened to push initial delivery to 2035 — three years behind the 2032 full operational capability date Congress mandated in the FY2024 NDAA — a contract modification funded through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reconciliation package awarded to Northrop Grumman in April 2026 accelerated the schedule to a 2031 delivery, with preliminary design review targeted for 2028. MDA Director Lt. Gen. Heath Collins confirmed the acceleration in April 15 congressional testimony. The GPI is designed to slot into the existing Aegis weapon system's vertical launch cells, providing the Navy's surface combatants with a counter-hypersonic capability that complements space-based sensing — though the weapon is primarily optimized for regional rather than homeland-scale defense scenarios. Japan is the lead developer of rocket motors and propulsion components for GPI under a formal cooperative development arrangement.

Program Role in Kill Chain Key Milestone Prime Contractor(s)
HBTSS Fire-control-quality IR tracking of HGVs and ballistic missiles L3Harris prototype validated Apr. 2025; March 2025 simulated engagement demo L3Harris Technologies (lead); Northrop Grumman
SDA Tracking Layer T1/T2/T3 Wide-field IR warning & custody; cueing for HBTSS T1 launches begun late 2025; T2 CDR complete; T3 $3.5B awarded Dec. 2025 Lockheed Martin, L3Harris, Northrop Grumman, Rocket Lab, Sierra Space
SB-AMTI Detect/track/target airborne movers: cruise missiles, aircraft SpaceX $4.16B award May 29, 2026; IOC by 2028; $7B FY27 request SpaceX (initial award); 8 others in vendor pool (undisclosed)
Space Data Network Backbone Secure inter-domain comms linking sensors to shooters SpaceX $2.29B award May 26, 2026; Starshield-based SpaceX
Glide Phase Interceptor Hit-to-kill engagement of HGVs in glide phase; Aegis-compatible Northrop sole prime since Sept. 2024; PDR target 2028; IOC 2031 Northrop Grumman (U.S.-Japan cooperative)
DARPA Glide Breaker Long-range hit-to-kill engagement propulsion demonstration $38M FY2025 request; advanced propulsion R&D phase DARPA

Technical Challenges That Remain

Despite the programmatic momentum, significant technical challenges persist across the sensor chain. At the detection level, the dim-target problem for HGVs is partially solved but not fully characterized for all threat variants. The NATO STO 2025 analysis confirmed detectability from GEO in mid-wave infrared for representative boost-glide flight states, but the analysis also noted that results varied substantially by target altitude, velocity, and spectral band. HBTSS's medium field-of-view infrared sensors are well-suited to the problem, but the fire-control handoff — turning an HBTSS track into a GPI launch authorization — requires continuous custody across multiple sensor field-of-regard boundaries as satellites move in LEO. A 2025 academic cybersecurity and tracking study from the University of South Australia identified custody handoff across satellite coverage gaps as one of the unresolved research frontiers, noting that the problem requires advanced multi-model tracking algorithms capable of handling the maneuvering uncertainty of HGVs without dropping track.

The plasma sheath attenuation problem for radar systems simultaneously underscores the indispensability of infrared LEO sensors while creating its own vulnerability: an adversary who understands that infrared cueing drives the kill chain can design HGV flight profiles to minimize thermal signature during the most critical tracking windows, exploiting the inherent trade-off between altitude, velocity, and radiative intensity. Chinese research published from Xidian University's National Key Laboratory of Radar Signal Processing in October 2025 — focused on hierarchical adaptive tracking methods for hypersonic glide targets — demonstrates that PRC scientists are actively modeling the tracking problem from the defender's perspective, likely informing future evasive maneuvering strategies.

On the AMTI side, distinguishing a cruise missile from a low-altitude maneuvering aircraft in a dense electronic warfare environment from LEO involves synthetic aperture radar or passive infrared phenomenology at slant ranges that stress current sensor performance. The Space Force has not publicly disclosed which sensing modalities — radar, infrared, or multi-spectral — will be employed in the SpaceX SB-AMTI constellation, citing national security classification. Chief of Space Operations Gen. Chance Salzman acknowledged in May 2025 testimony that "space offers a lot of advantages, particularly in a contested environment, but it isn't necessarily optimized for the full spectrum of operations." The key word is "optimized" — space-based AMTI will fill the survivability gap left by retiring AWACS, but the transition period through 2028 leaves a meaningful capability seam that the Air Force is attempting to bridge with five dedicated E-2D Hawkeyes funded at $150 million in FY2026 and additional E-2D procurement at $1.4 billion.

"By focusing these capabilities to the space domain, we are providing the Joint Force with sustained battlespace awareness of contested airspace." — Col. Ryan Frazier, Acting Space Force Portfolio Acquisition Executive, May 29, 2026

The SpaceX Concentration Question

The scale of SpaceX's Golden Dome position is without modern precedent in commercial defense contracting. Prior to May 29, the program had distributed approximately $3.2 billion in prototype contracts across twelve firms. SpaceX's AMTI contract alone exceeds that sum. Combined with the Space Data Network Backbone award, SpaceX now holds approximately $6.45 billion in Golden Dome contracts — more than the aggregate prototype pool for all other participants combined, which includes Anduril, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, and True Anomaly.

The Space Force has emphasized a multi-vendor architecture and stated explicitly that "we will not leverage any one single provider." Additional SB-AMTI awards to other vendors in the nine-company OTA pool are expected within the next year. Nevertheless, the combination of AMTI sensors, Space Data Network Backbone, Starship launch capacity — the only vehicle that can ultimately deploy the full AMTI constellation at scale — and Starshield classified communications creates an integrated vertical position that raises genuine questions about programmatic resilience. If SpaceX's production lines, launch cadence, or organizational stability were disrupted, no current alternative could absorb the program on the timelines the Space Force has publicly committed to. The program's own FY2027 budget request, at $7 billion for SB-AMTI alone, presupposes a production infrastructure that effectively exists in only one place.

The conflict-of-interest dimensions are beyond this analysis to resolve. What the defense acquisition community can assess is that the concentration of national security sensing infrastructure in a pre-IPO company simultaneously preparing for what analysts project could be the largest initial public offering in history — while its chief executive maintains a senior advisory role to the sitting administration — represents an accountability structure that the existing Federal Acquisition Regulation framework was not designed to manage. Whether through enhanced oversight authority, explicit multi-vendor production minimums, or government data rights clauses that would permit technology transfer to alternative integrators, the GAO and congressional oversight committees will face pressure to define what responsible concentration management looks like in the new commercial space defense era.

Outlook: 2028 and Beyond

The Golden Dome architecture, as documented in the August 2025 government slide presentation and formalized in the March 2026 $10 billion budget acceleration approved by Gen. Guetlein, envisions four layers: the space-based sensing and targeting layer (HBTSS, SDA Tracking Layer, SB-AMTI); ground-based radar arrays; laser systems; and interceptors ranging from Aegis-compatible GPI rounds to a longer-term space-based interceptor constellation still in research and development. Total program cost has risen to $185 billion, up from the original $175 billion estimate, with full-scale procurement beginning post-2028. The Congressional Budget Office has separately estimated space-based interceptor constellations alone at $160 billion to $540 billion over two decades depending on constellation size — figures that do not include the sensing layer now under contract.

The immediate 2028 milestone — initial constellation of SB-AMTI satellites providing early capability — represents the first concrete date by which the United States will have any persistent space-based tracking of the airborne moving target category that includes advanced cruise missiles. Achieving it requires SpaceX to design, manufacture, test, and launch a new class of national security satellites while simultaneously building the Space Data Network Backbone infrastructure, all under an OTA contracting framework that sacrifices some traditional government oversight in the name of schedule. The Space Force's willingness to accept that trade reflects a judgment that the threat isn't waiting for the acquisition system to catch up.

What is clear from the technical trajectory — HBTSS validated on orbit, SDA tracking tranches stacking, GPI back on an accelerated schedule, and SB-AMTI funded at a scale that eclipses all prior AMTI investments combined — is that the U.S. defense establishment has converged on a strategic answer to the hypersonic tracking problem. Whether the answer can be fielded quickly enough, reliably enough, and with sufficient institutional resilience to matter in a conflict that may arrive before 2030 remains the open question.

Verified Sources & Citations
  1. Space Systems Command Press Release, "Space Force Awards SpaceX $4.16B SB-AMTI Contract," May 29, 2026. https://breakingdefense.com/2026/05/spacex-wins-4-16b-space-force-contract-to-detect-airborne-moving-targets/
  2. Defense Scoop, "SpaceX Wins $4B Deal to Accelerate Deployment of Aircraft-Tracking Satellites," May 29, 2026. https://defensescoop.com/2026/05/29/spacex-amti-contract-space-force/
  3. Reuters, "SpaceX Wins $4.16B U.S. Space Force Contract for Threat-Detection Satellites," May 29, 2026. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/29/spacex-wins-4point16-billion-space-force-contract-for-threat-detection-satellites.html
  4. Defense Scoop, "Golden Dome Budget Plan Gets $10B Plus-Up to Accelerate Space Capabilities," March 17, 2026. https://defensescoop.com/2026/03/17/golden-dome-budget-plan-increase-space-capabilities-guetlein/
  5. Breaking Defense, "To Accelerate Space Capabilities, Pentagon Ups Golden Dome Spending Plan by $10 Billion," March 17, 2026. https://breakingdefense.com/2026/03/to-accelerate-space-capabilities-pentagon-ups-golden-dome-spending-plan-by-10-billion/
  6. Space Development Agency, "SDA Makes Awards to Build 72 Tracking Layer Satellites for Tranche 3," Dec. 19, 2025. https://www.sda.mil/space-development-agency-makes-awards-to-build-72-tracking-layer-satellites-for-tranche-3/
  7. SpaceNews, "Space Development Agency Awards $3.5 Billion in Contracts for Missile-Tracking Satellites," Dec. 19, 2025. https://spacenews.com/space-development-agency-awards-3-5-billion-in-contracts-for-missile-tracking-satellites/
  8. SpaceNews, "L3Harris Gains Edge in Race to Build Golden Dome Missile Sensors," April 25, 2025. https://spacenews.com/l3harris-gains-edge-in-race-to-build-golden-dome-missile-sensors/
  9. MIT Lincoln Laboratory, "Lincoln Laboratory Supports Missile Defense Agency Space Sensor Testing." https://www.ll.mit.edu/news/lincoln-laboratory-supports-missile-defense-agency-space-sensor-testing
  10. MDA / DSIAC, "MDA, SDA Confirm Successful Launch of the HBTSS and Tranche 0 Satellites," Feb. 14, 2024. https://dsiac.dtic.mil/articles/mda-sda-confirm-successful-launch-of-the-hypersonic-and-ballistic-tracking-space-sensor-and-tranche-0-satellites
  11. Defense Acquisition University, "HBTSS — Development and Delivery at the Speed of Relevancy," Defense Acquisition Magazine, March–April 2025. https://www.dau.edu/sites/default/files/2025-02/MDA_MarApr2025.pdf
  12. Congressional Research Service, "Hypersonic Missile Defense: Issues for Congress," Updated May 2025 (IF11623). https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11623
  13. Congressional Research Service, "Defense Primer: Hypersonic Boost-Glide Weapons" (IF11459). https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11459
  14. H.R.4107, Golden Dome Act of 2025, 119th Congress, June 2025. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4107/text
  15. Northrop Grumman Press Release, "Northrop Grumman Awarded Glide Phase Interceptor Development Modification Contract," April 15, 2026. https://news.northropgrumman.com/gpi/northrop-grumman-awarded-glide-phase-interceptor-development-modification-contract
  16. Air and Space Forces Magazine, "Extra Funding Puts Hypersonic Interceptor Program Back on Track," April 16, 2026. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/hypersonic-interceptor-program-back-on-track-gpi/
  17. Defense News, "Reduced Funding Slows MDA's Hypersonic Interceptor Development," May 6, 2025. https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2025/05/06/reduced-funding-slows-mdas-hypersonic-interceptor-development/
  18. Defense Scoop, "MDA Taps Northrop Grumman to Move Forward in Glide Phase Interceptor Program," Sept. 25, 2024. https://defensescoop.com/2024/09/25/northrop-grumman-glide-phase-interceptor-mda-ota/
  19. Air and Space Forces Magazine, "Pentagon Relents, Seeks Funds for E-7 Wedgetail," May 2026. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/pentagon-relents-seeks-funds-for-e-7-wedgetail/
  20. Defense One, "Air Force Presses for Space-Based Radar Despite AWACS Loss in Iran," April 16, 2026. https://www.defenseone.com/defense-systems/2026/04/air-force-secretary-doubles-down-space-based-radar-bet-amid-key-aircraft-losses-iran/412887/
  21. The Aviationist, "USAF E-3 AWACS Loss in Saudi Arabia Puts Spotlight on E-7 Wedgetail Procurement," April 1, 2026. https://theaviationist.com/2026/04/01/e-3-awacs-loss-saudi-arabia-e-7-wedgetail/
  22. L3Harris Technologies, "L3Harris Rapidly Advances U.S. Hypersonic Missile Tracking and Defense Capabilities," Sept. 2024. https://www.l3harris.com/newsroom/editorial/2024/09/l3harris-rapidly-advances-us-hypersonic-missile-tracking-and-defense
  23. Lockheed Martin Press Release, "Lockheed Martin Secures Tracking Layer Contract from Space Development Agency," Dec. 19, 2025. https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2025-12-19-Lockheed-Martin-secures-Tracking-Layer-contract-from-Space-Development-Agency
  24. Sierra Space, "Sierra Space Successfully Completes CDR for Missile Tracking Satellites in SDA Tranche 2," Sept. 29, 2025. https://www.sierraspace.com/press-releases/sierra-space-successfully-completes-critical-design-review-for-missile-tracking-satellites-in-sda-tranche-2/
  25. National Defense Magazine, "Space Development Agency's Missile Defense Architecture Evolves," May 2026. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2026/5/1/space-development-agencys-missile-defense-architecture-evolves
  26. Space.com, "US Space Force Wants Space-Based Missile Interceptors for Golden Dome Ready by 2028," April 2026. https://www.space.com/space-exploration/satellites/us-space-force-wants-space-based-missile-interceptors-for-golden-dome-ready-by-2028
  27. NATO Science and Technology Organization, Geißler, K. & Dalichau, H., "Detection of Hypersonic Boost-Glide Vehicles From a Geostationary Orbit," STO-MP-AVT-SET-SCI-396, 2025. https://www.sto.nato.int/document/detection-of-hypersonic-boost-glide-vehicles-from-a-geostationary-orbit/
  28. Law, Y.W. et al., "Detecting and Tracking Hypersonic Glide Vehicles: A Cybersecurity-Informed Analysis," International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, 2025. https://papers.academic-conferences.org/index.php/iccws/article/download/950/955
  29. Shao, H. et al., "A Hierarchical Adaptive Moment Matching Multiple Model Tracking Method for Hypersonic Glide Target Under Measurement Uncertainty," Sensors 25(21):6621, Oct. 28, 2025. DOI: 10.3390/s25216621. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12610629/
  30. General Atomics Electromagnetic Systems, "General Atomics to Provide Missile Tracking Payloads for Lockheed Martin SDA Tranche 2." https://douglasmmessier.substack.com/p/general-atomics-to-provide-missile
  31. Army Recognition, "U.S. Speeds Up $1.3B Glide Phase Interceptor for Early Hypersonic Missile Intercept Capability," April 2026. https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/aerospace-news/2026/u-s-speeds-up-1-3b-glide-phase-interceptor-for-early-hypersonic-missile-intercept-capability

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Engineering Calculus Behind SB-AMTI:

 Eight Tradeoffs That Will Define Whether It Works May 30, 2026 Companion Analysis — Sensors / Signal Processing Bottom Line U...