Analysis of Recent Multi-Airport Incursions Reveals Coordinated Operations Involving Advanced Unmanned Systems Across Scandinavian Airspace
In an escalating pattern of aerial intrusions that has prompted NATO consultations and exposed critical vulnerabilities in European airspace security, Denmark has reported what officials characterize as "hybrid attacks" by sophisticated drone networks operating across multiple airports and military installations simultaneously.
The incidents, which began on September 22, 2025, represent the most serious coordinated drone incursions recorded in European civilian airspace, forcing the closure of Denmark's busiest airports and disrupting tens of thousands of passengers while raising fundamental questions about the detection and mitigation capabilities of current aviation security systems.
Technical Analysis of Drone Operations
Danish National Police Commissioner Thorkild Fogde characterized the aircraft involved as "large drones that likely had a capable operator" rather than amateur or hobby devices, noting that "the way they went into the airspace, the number of drones, the time that they were in the airspace – altogether leads us to the conclusion that it must be some kind of more capable operator behind the drones."
The operations demonstrated sophisticated coordination, with Denmark's Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen stating: "There can be no doubt that everything points to this being the work of a professional actor when we are talking about such a systematic operation in so many locations at virtually the same time."
The drone networks displayed several technically advanced characteristics:
Temporal Coordination: Multiple airport incursions occurred simultaneously across geographic distances, with drones observed at Aalborg, Esbjerg, Sonderborg, and Skrydstrup airports during overlapping timeframes on September 24-25.
Operational Persistence: At Copenhagen Airport on September 22, two to three large drones maintained operations in controlled airspace for nearly four hours, forcing complete closure of takeoffs and landings at Scandinavia's largest airport.
Strategic Targeting: The incursions specifically targeted dual-use facilities, including Fighter Wing Skrydstrup, which serves as the base for Denmark's F-16 and F-35 fighter jets, suggesting detailed reconnaissance of critical military infrastructure.
Detection System Limitations Exposed
The incidents have revealed significant gaps in European counter-drone capabilities. Denmark's Defense Minister acknowledged that the country "does not have a ground-based air defence system" and that existing military assets, including F-35 fighter jets and naval frigates, would not be fully effective against this type of drone threat.
Current drone detection technologies typically employ multiple sensor modalities:
Radio Frequency (RF) Analysis: Systems capture communications between unmanned aerial vehicles and ground control stations, but this approach fails against autonomous systems or those using encrypted protocols.
Radar Detection: While effective in clear weather conditions, conventional radar systems often lack the resolution required to detect smaller drone signatures, particularly in cluttered electromagnetic environments near airports.
Acoustic Detection: Microphone arrays can triangulate drone positions based on acoustic signatures, but performance degrades significantly in high-noise environments like active airports.
Visual Detection: Optical and thermal imaging systems provide detailed threat assessment capabilities but are limited by weather conditions and line-of-sight requirements.
Danish defense technology company MyDefence, which specializes in counter-unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS), maintains extensive drone libraries to understand threat capabilities, acknowledging that "there will always be drones that are impossible to detect, but if we manage to cover an area of about 95%, we are on the right track."
Geopolitical Implications and NATO Response
The timing and methodology of the incursions have occurred within a broader context of escalating tensions between NATO members and Russia. Recent weeks have seen documented Russian drone violations of Polish and Romanian airspace, along with Estonian reports of Russian MiG-31 fighter jets entering national airspace without authorization.
Denmark is considering invoking NATO Article 4, which allows member states to request consultations when their territorial integrity or security is threatened. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has confirmed the alliance's commitment to defending "every inch of Allied territory" while launching Operation Eastern Sentry to strengthen air defenses along Europe's eastern flank.
Russia's embassy in Denmark has dismissed involvement allegations as "staged provocation," with Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov characterizing the accusations as "unfounded" and suggesting they represent attempts to "escalate tension in the interests of forces seeking by all means to prolong the Ukrainian conflict."
Broader Pattern of Hybrid Warfare Tactics
Security analysts classify these incidents within the emerging doctrine of hybrid warfare – coordinated campaigns employing multiple vectors including cyberattacks, disinformation, and physical disruption to create strategic uncertainty without triggering conventional military responses.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen characterized the drone incidents as "part of a pattern of persistent contestation at our borders," noting that "critical infrastructure is at risk."
The psychological and economic effects extend beyond immediate operational disruption. Copenhagen Airport alone experienced over 100 flight cancellations during the initial incident, with diversions affecting airports across Sweden and disrupting travel for tens of thousands of passengers.
SIDEBAR: Legacy Airport Surveillance and the Evolution to Drone Detection
ASDE-3: Foundation of Modern Airport Surface Surveillance
The Airport Surface Detection Equipment Model 3 (ASDE-3) radar system, developed by the Federal Aviation Administration in the 1990s, established the technological foundation for comprehensive airport perimeter monitoring that modern counter-drone systems now build upon. Originally designed to track aircraft and ground vehicles on airport surfaces during low-visibility conditions, ASDE-3 employed Ku-band radar technology operating at 16.7 GHz with a range resolution of approximately 7.5 meters.
The system's primary innovation lay in its ability to distinguish between aircraft, ground vehicles, and stationary objects through advanced signal processing algorithms that analyzed radar cross-section signatures and movement patterns. However, ASDE-3's design parameters—optimized for detecting large metallic objects moving at relatively high speeds—created significant blind spots for small, slow-moving targets like modern drones.
Multi-Sensor Fusion: The ASDE-X Evolution
The Airport Surface Detection Equipment Model X (ASDE-X), which replaced ASDE-3 at major airports beginning in 2003, introduced multi-sensor fusion techniques that are directly relevant to current drone detection challenges. ASDE-X combined:
- Primary Radar: High-resolution X-band surface movement radar from Raytheon
- Multilateration (MLAT): Passive surveillance using time-difference-of-arrival calculations from Mode S transponder squitters
- ADS-B Reception: Automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast data integration
- AMASS Integration: Airport Movement Area Safety System for automated tracking
- ACME Processing: CACI's Automated Clutter and Multipath Elimination system
The fusion algorithms developed for ASDE-X demonstrated how multiple sensor modalities could be combined to create comprehensive situational awareness, even when individual sensors provided incomplete or ambiguous data. These techniques directly inform modern counter-drone architectures.
Lessons for Modern Drone Detection Systems
The evolution from ASDE-3 to ASDE-X, combined with FAA-industry partnerships, revealed critical insights applicable to drone surveillance:
Size vs. Signature Trade-offs: While ASDE-3 could detect aircraft at considerable range, its minimum detectable velocity (typically 2-3 knots) meant slowly moving or hovering drones remained invisible. Modern systems must balance sensitivity against false alarm rates from birds, debris, and atmospheric phenomena.
Environmental Adaptation: ASDE-X's multi-sensor approach proved essential for maintaining performance across varying weather conditions, terrain features, and electromagnetic interference—challenges that drone detection systems face in even greater magnitude.
Data Fusion Complexity: The computational requirements for real-time sensor fusion in ASDE-X systems demonstrated that effective perimeter surveillance requires sophisticated algorithms capable of processing multiple data streams simultaneously while maintaining sub-second response times.
Integration Challenges: ASDE-X implementation revealed the difficulties of integrating new surveillance technologies with existing air traffic control systems—a challenge that counter-drone systems must address while avoiding interference with critical aviation electronics.
Modern Applications
Contemporary drone detection systems at airports like those deployed at Heathrow and Schiphol build directly on ASDE-X principles, incorporating:
- 3D AESA Radars: Advanced Active Electronically Scanned Array systems providing superior drone tracking capabilities with electronic beam steering and enhanced sensitivity for small, slow-moving targets
- Phased Array Integration: Multi-beam radar systems offering 360-degree coverage with rapid target acquisition
- Electro-Optical/Infrared Sensors: Adding visual confirmation capabilities absent in traditional radar systems
- Acoustic Arrays: Detecting drone signatures through audio analysis, particularly effective for rotorcraft-type drones
- RF Spectrum Analyzers: Identifying control signals and data links between drones and operators
- Enhanced Signal Processing: Building on CACI's AMASS and ACME technologies for improved target discrimination and false alarm reduction
The Denmark incidents demonstrate that even these advanced systems can be overcome by sophisticated adversaries using coordinated operations, autonomous flight modes, and counter-surveillance techniques—highlighting the ongoing technological arms race in airport perimeter security.
Technology Development Imperatives
Danish authorities have announced plans to "acquire new capabilities for detection" and propose legislation providing "increased opportunities for infrastructure owners to also shoot down drones." However, kinetic countermeasures in civilian airport environments present significant collateral damage risks.
Advanced countermeasure technologies under development include:
Electronic Warfare Systems: Targeted RF jamming capabilities that can disrupt drone communications and navigation systems without affecting legitimate aviation electronics.
Directed Energy Weapons: High-powered microwave and laser systems capable of disabling drone electronics at range, though power requirements and atmospheric limitations remain challenges.
Interceptor Drones: Autonomous systems designed to physically intercept hostile drones, offering precision engagement capabilities in sensitive environments.
Integrated Sensor Networks: Multi-modal detection systems combining radar, optical, acoustic, and RF sensors with artificial intelligence analysis for improved detection accuracy and reduced false alarms.
Scientific and Policy Implications
The incidents underscore fundamental questions about airspace sovereignty in an era of accessible drone technology. Research conducted by Danish institutions has emphasized the need for comprehensive Unmanned Traffic Management (UTM) systems capable of identifying and tracking all drone operations within national airspace.
The challenge extends beyond technical solutions to regulatory frameworks governing civilian versus military responses to airspace violations. Current international aviation law was developed for conventional aircraft threats and lacks specific protocols for persistent, coordinated drone incursions.
NATO is developing a "drone wall" concept along its eastern borders, while individual member states are rapidly acquiring ground-based air defense systems specifically designed for counter-drone operations.
Research Priorities and Future Directions
The Denmark incidents have highlighted critical research needs across multiple scientific disciplines:
Materials Science: Development of lightweight, long-endurance drone platforms capable of extended autonomous operations suggests advances in battery technology and composite materials that merit investigation.
Artificial Intelligence: The coordination demonstrated across multiple aircraft and locations implies sophisticated autonomous or semi-autonomous control systems with potential applications in legitimate aerospace research.
Signal Processing: Advanced RF analysis techniques for detecting and characterizing encrypted or frequency-hopping communication protocols used in modern unmanned systems.
Atmospheric Science: Integration of weather prediction models with drone flight characteristics to improve detection algorithms and predict operational patterns.
The incidents represent a watershed moment in European aviation security, demonstrating that sophisticated unmanned systems can successfully coordinate complex operations against advanced air defense networks. As investigations continue, the scientific community must grapple with the dual-use implications of rapidly advancing drone technologies while developing countermeasures that preserve the openness and efficiency of civilian airspace.
Implications for Global Aviation Security: The U.S. Vulnerability Assessment
The Denmark incidents have profound implications for aviation security worldwide, particularly for the United States, where airport infrastructure may be even more vulnerable to similar coordinated drone attacks. The conflict in Ukraine has demonstrated how readily available commercial drone components can be weaponized and smuggled across international borders, creating a distributed threat that traditional security measures struggle to address.
Component Smuggling and Assembly Networks
The Ukraine-Russia conflict has revealed sophisticated supply chains for drone components that bypass conventional arms control measures. Commercial flight controllers, GPS modules, communications systems, and battery packs – all dual-use technologies with legitimate civilian applications – can be easily transported across borders and assembled into capable military systems.
Intelligence assessments from the conflict zone indicate that key components are often sourced from multiple countries, with final assembly occurring near operational areas. This distributed manufacturing model means that detecting hostile drone operations requires monitoring not just finished systems, but entire supply chains of seemingly innocuous electronic components.
For U.S. airports, this presents a particularly acute challenge. The open architecture of American aviation infrastructure, designed for efficiency and passenger convenience, offers numerous potential assembly and launch points for hostile drone operations. Unlike the relatively compact geography of Denmark, U.S. airports are often surrounded by extensive suburban and industrial areas that could provide cover for drone assembly and launch operations.
U.S. Airport Vulnerability Analysis
American airports present several unique vulnerabilities compared to their European counterparts:
Geographic Scale: Major U.S. airport complexes like Los Angeles International (LAX) and John F. Kennedy International (JFK) cover thousands of acres with extended perimeters that are impossible to monitor comprehensively using traditional security methods.
Airspace Complexity: The integration of civilian, military, and general aviation traffic around major U.S. airports creates complex electromagnetic environments that could mask hostile drone signatures among legitimate air traffic.
Infrastructure Density: Many U.S. airports are located in densely populated metropolitan areas with numerous tall buildings, industrial facilities, and transportation infrastructure that could serve as launch or control points for coordinated drone operations.
Regulatory Gaps: The Federal Aviation Administration's current drone regulations focus primarily on recreational and commercial use, with limited provisions for detecting and responding to hostile operations.
Current U.S. Counter-Drone Capabilities
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and Department of Homeland Security have begun deploying counter-drone systems at major airports, but coverage remains limited. Current U.S. capabilities include:
Perimeter Radar Systems: Advanced radar installations capable of detecting small aerial targets, though performance varies significantly based on environmental conditions and system configuration.
RF Monitoring Networks: Communications intelligence systems that can identify drone control signals, but are less effective against autonomous systems or those using encrypted protocols.
Kinetic Countermeasures: Limited deployment of directed-energy weapons and interceptor systems, primarily at high-value military installations rather than civilian airports.
However, these systems face significant operational constraints in civilian environments. Unlike military installations, civilian airports cannot readily employ kinetic countermeasures that might endanger passenger aircraft or violate federal communications regulations.
Technology Solutions for U.S. Implementation
Several emerging technologies could enhance U.S. airport security against drone threats:
AI-Enhanced Detection Networks: Machine learning algorithms trained on vast databases of drone signatures could improve detection accuracy while reducing false alarms from birds, aircraft, and other aerial objects.
Integrated Sensor Fusion: Combining radar, optical, acoustic, and RF sensors with artificial intelligence analysis could provide comprehensive coverage of airport airspace while adapting to local environmental conditions.
Non-Kinetic Countermeasures: Electronic warfare systems specifically designed for civilian environments could disrupt hostile drone operations without the collateral damage risks of kinetic solutions.
Supply Chain Monitoring: Advanced tracking systems for drone-capable components, similar to those used for monitoring nuclear materials, could help identify potential threats before they reach operational status.
Policy and Regulatory Recommendations
Addressing the drone threat to U.S. aviation requires comprehensive policy reforms:
Expanded Detection Mandates: Congress could require comprehensive counter-drone systems at all airports handling more than a specified number of passengers annually, with federal funding support for implementation.
Enhanced Component Tracking: Import regulations could be modified to require enhanced documentation and tracking for dual-use drone components, particularly high-performance flight controllers and communications systems.
Coordinated Response Protocols: Federal agencies could develop standardized procedures for responding to drone incursions that coordinate between TSA, FAA, FBI, and local law enforcement while maintaining aviation safety.
International Cooperation: The State Department could lead efforts to establish international agreements on drone component tracking and counter-drone technology sharing, building on existing arms control frameworks.
Research and Development Priorities
The Denmark incidents highlight critical research needs for protecting U.S. aviation infrastructure:
Autonomous Detection Systems: Development of AI-powered systems capable of distinguishing between legitimate and hostile drone operations in complex airport environments.
Rapid Response Technologies: Research into systems that can quickly neutralize drone threats without disrupting normal airport operations or endangering passenger safety.
Predictive Analytics: Development of systems that can identify potential drone threats based on component purchasing patterns, flight planning data, and other intelligence indicators.
Environmental Adaptation: Research into counter-drone systems that can operate effectively in the diverse climate and geographic conditions found across U.S. airports.
The resolution of this challenge will require unprecedented cooperation between civilian aviation authorities, military organizations, technology developers, and international regulatory bodies to develop comprehensive responses that address both immediate security concerns and long-term technological trends in unmanned aerospace systems. For the United States, the lessons from Denmark serve as both a warning and an opportunity to develop more robust defenses before similar incidents occur in American airspace.
Sources
- ITV News. (2025, September 25). Everything we know about the drones grounding flights in Denmark and Norway. Retrieved from https://www.itv.com/news/2025-09-25/everything-we-know-about-the-drones-grounding-flights-in-scandinavia
- CNN. (2025, September 24). Drones close a Denmark airport for second time in a week. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/24/europe/denmark-aalborg-airport-closed-drones-latam-intl
- Al Jazeera. (2025, September 25). Denmark reports 'hybrid attack' as drones shutter major airport. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/25/denmark-shuts-second-airport-in-a-week-more-unidentified-drones-spotted
- Euronews. (2025, September 25). Denmark alerts NATO and EU after coordinated drone attacks at its airports. Retrieved from https://www.euronews.com/2025/09/25/denmark-is-on-alert-after-unauthorised-drone-activity-over-four-airports-on-wednesday-nigh
- Al Jazeera. (2025, September 22). Drone sightings disrupt flights at Copenhagen, Oslo airports. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/22/copenhagen-airport-shut-after-sighting-of-unidentified-drones
- ABC News. (2025, September 25). Mystery drones over Denmark are 'hybrid attack,' defense minister says. Retrieved from https://abcnews.go.com/International/mystery-drones-denmark-hybrid-attack-defense-minister/story?id=125918649
- CNN. (2025, September 23). Denmark links drones at Copenhagen airport to hybrid attacks across Europe. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/23/europe/denmark-drones-hybrid-attacks-intl
- CNN. (2025, September 24). Drones close a Denmark airport for second time in a week. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/24/europe/denmark-aalborg-airport-closed-drones-latam-intl
- CNN. (2025, September 22). Drone sightings disrupt flights in Norway, Denmark. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/22/europe/copenhagen-oslo-airport-closed-drones-int-latam
- CBS News. (2025, September 25). Denmark calls drones near airports a "hybrid attack" as Norway police seize drone and Russia pleads ignorance. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/denmark-drones-hybrid-attack-russia-pleads-ignorance/
- The Moscow Times. (2025, September 25). Moscow Slams Mystery Drone Flights in Denmark as 'Provocation'. Retrieved from https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/09/25/moscow-slams-mystery-drone-flights-in-denmark-as-provocation-a90625
- Bloomberg. (2025, September 25). Denmark Investigates Russia After Aalborg, Copenhagen Airport Drone Incidents. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-25/drones-at-four-danish-airports-halt-flights-spark-police-probe
- ABC News. (2025, September 25). Mystery drones over Denmark are 'hybrid attack,' defense minister says. Retrieved from https://abcnews.go.com/International/mystery-drones-denmark-hybrid-attack-defense-minister/story?id=125918649
- Danish Industry. MyDefence: Drone detection system. Retrieved from https://www.danskindustri.dk/medlemsforeninger/foreningssites/fos/om/medlemsportraetter/mydefence/
- Euronews. (2025, September 25). Denmark alerts NATO and EU after coordinated drone attacks at its airports. Retrieved from https://www.euronews.com/2025/09/25/denmark-is-on-alert-after-unauthorised-drone-activity-over-four-airports-on-wednesday-nigh
- Drone Identification and Tracking in Denmark. (2016). ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348751258_Drone_Identification_and_Tracking_in_Denmark_Drone_Identification_and_Tracking_in_Denmark
- MyDefence. C-UAS Solutions for Drone Detection and Jamming. Retrieved from https://mydefence.com/
- Al Jazeera. (2025, September 25). Denmark reports 'hybrid attack' as drones shutter major airport. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/25/denmark-shuts-second-airport-in-a-week-more-unidentified-drones-spotted
- Kyiv Independent. (2025, September 22). Denmark, Norway close airports after drone sightings. Retrieved from https://kyivindependent.com/denmarks-copenhagen-airport-shut-down-after-drone-sightings/
- Unmanned Systems Technology. (2022, November 9). Drone Detection. Retrieved from https://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/expo/drone-detection/
- NBC News. (2025, September 23). Drones shut Copenhagen Airport in 'serious attack'; NATO weighs tougher Russia action. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/world/europe/drones-shut-copenhagen-airport-attack-russia-nato-oslo-denmark-ukraine-rcna233127
- Newsweek. (2025, September 25). NATO Ally Denmark Calls Mystery Drones Chaos 'Hybrid Attack'. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/nato-denmark-drones-hybrid-attack-airports-10642013
- Kyiv Independent. (2025, September 25). Denmark weighs NATO Article 4 after more suspicious drone incursions. Retrieved from https://kyivindependent.com/denmark-shuts-down-airport-over-suspicious-drone-sightings-for-2nd-time-this-week/
- Newsweek. (2025, September 23). Russia Link Possible in 'Serious Attack' on NATO's Denmark. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/nato-denmark-drones-russia-copenhagen-airport-10473830
- Euronews. (2025, September 25). Denmark alerts NATO and EU after coordinated drone attacks at its airports. Retrieved from https://www.euronews.com/2025/09/25/denmark-is-on-alert-after-unauthorised-drone-activity-over-four-airports-on-wednesday-nigh
- CBS News. (2025, September 25). Denmark calls drones near airports a "hybrid attack" as Norway police seize drone and Russia pleads ignorance. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/denmark-drones-hybrid-attack-russia-pleads-ignorance/
- Washington Examiner. (2025, September 25). Denmark weighs invoking NATO's Article 4 as unidentified drone sightings plague the country. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/3823841/denmark-invoking-nato-article-4/
- NATO. (2025, September 23). Press conference by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte following a statement by the North Atlantic Council on recent airspace violations by Russia. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_237718.htm
- The Mirror. (2025, September 25). Nato Article 4 trigger warning as Denmark says 'hybrid drone attack'. Retrieved from https://www.themirror.com/news/world-news/denmark-article-4-drone-attack-1410077
- NATO. (2025, September 10). Statement by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on the violation of Polish airspace by Russian drones. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_237559.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment