Counter-Drone Defense Meets Autonomous Mobility

The Evolution of Ground-Based Radar Systems

In a former Polish tank factory in Warsaw, engineers are developing what may represent the future of mobile air defense: unmanned ground vehicles equipped with sophisticated radar systems capable of detecting and tracking drones from multiple angles simultaneously. This collaboration between American radar manufacturer Echodyne and Poland's Military Institute of Armored and Automotive Technology (WITPiS) exemplifies a broader transformation in how militaries worldwide are addressing the proliferation of small unmanned aerial systems (UAS) across battlefields and critical infrastructure.

The partnership, facilitated by Polish distributor Linc Polska, aims to integrate Echodyne's metamaterials electronically scanned array (MESA) radar technology into WITPiS-developed unmanned ground vehicles. This integration addresses a critical vulnerability in current counter-UAS (C-UAS) systems: the ability to maintain continuous surveillance while repositioning to avoid counter-targeting or to follow mobile assets.

The Drone Threat Landscape

The urgency behind such developments has been underscored by recent conflicts. Ukraine's ongoing defense against Russian aggression has demonstrated both the effectiveness of small drones for reconnaissance and strikes, and the difficulty of countering them. According to data from the Royal United Services Institute, Ukrainian forces have employed thousands of commercial and military drones, ranging from small quadcopters conducting artillery spotting to larger fixed-wing systems delivering precision strikes. This operational reality has accelerated C-UAS development across NATO member states, with Poland—sharing a border with Ukraine and hosting significant alliance forces—particularly focused on modernizing its defensive capabilities.

The scale of the challenge is substantial. A 2023 report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies documented over 1,200 documented drone attacks globally between 2016 and 2022, targeting everything from military installations to oil facilities, airports, and government buildings. Traditional air defense systems, designed for fast-moving aircraft and missiles, often struggle with the low, slow, and small signature of consumer-grade drones, which can cost as little as $500 but threaten assets worth millions.

The Technology: Metamaterials and Electronic Beam Steering

Echodyne's MESA radar technology represents a significant departure from conventional radar systems. Traditional mechanically scanned radars require physical rotation of antenna arrays to survey airspace, introducing inherent delays and mechanical complexity. Phased array radars, while offering electronic beam steering, have historically required expensive and power-hungry components, limiting their deployment on mobile platforms.

Metamaterials—artificially structured materials with electromagnetic properties not found in nature—offer a middle path. Echodyne's approach uses metamaterial surfaces to manipulate radar waves electronically without requiring thousands of individual transmit/receive modules. This architecture, according to the company's technical documentation, enables rapid beam steering across wide fields of regard while maintaining the compact size and power efficiency necessary for mobile applications.

The physics underlying this capability involves creating specific patterns on antenna surfaces that interact with electromagnetic waves in precisely controlled ways. When voltage is applied to these patterns, they alter the phase of transmitted and received signals, effectively steering the radar beam electronically. This allows Echodyne's systems to track multiple targets simultaneously—what the company terms "4D" tracking, incorporating three spatial dimensions plus velocity data—while maintaining update rates measured in fractions of a second rather than the several seconds typical of mechanically scanning systems.

Dr. Nathan Kundtz, Echodyne's founder and former metamaterials researcher at Duke University, has published extensively on the theoretical foundations of this technology. His work builds on earlier research by David R. Smith and colleagues, who demonstrated that metamaterial structures could achieve negative refractive indices—a property with no natural analog—opening pathways to novel electromagnetic devices.

Integration Challenges and Tactical Advantages

Mounting radar systems on unmanned ground vehicles introduces unique engineering challenges. Unlike fixed installations with stable power supplies and vibration-free mounting, UGVs operate in harsh environments with limited electrical power, significant mechanical vibration, and the constant movement that can introduce motion-related radar artifacts.

WITPiS, established in 1952 as Poland's primary research institution for combat vehicle development, brings deep expertise in vehicle integration to the collaboration. The institute has previously worked on modernization programs for Poland's Leopard 2 main battle tanks and Rosomak armored personnel carriers, giving its engineers familiarity with the stringent requirements of military vehicle electronics.

The tactical advantages of mobile C-UAS radar are significant. Fixed radar installations, while providing continuous coverage, can be mapped by adversaries and targeted with artillery, missiles, or electronic warfare. Mobile systems complicate targeting and enable defensive repositioning. Additionally, UGV-mounted radars can accompany moving military formations, extending a protective bubble that moves with the protected assets—particularly valuable for convoy operations or advancing forces.

Contemporary military doctrine increasingly emphasizes distributed operations, with smaller units operating across wider geographic areas. This dispersion improves survivability against precision weapons but creates sensor coverage gaps. Networks of UGV-mounted radars could provide overlapping coverage zones that adapt dynamically to operational needs.

The Broader C-UAS Ecosystem

Radar detection represents only the first step in a complete counter-drone system. Effective C-UAS architectures require integration of multiple sensors, command and control systems, and various defeat mechanisms—what defense planners call a "system of systems" approach.

After radar detection, additional sensors refine target identification. Electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) cameras provide visual confirmation, distinguishing between drones, birds, and other radar contacts. Radio frequency (RF) sensors detect command and control signals, potentially identifying drone type and operator location. According to research published in the IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, multi-sensor fusion significantly improves detection probability while reducing false alarm rates—critical in environments where friendly drones, civilian aircraft, and wildlife create complex airspaces.

Defeat mechanisms vary by operational context. In military environments, options include electronic jamming to disrupt drone communications, directed energy weapons (lasers or high-power microwaves), kinetic interceptors ranging from conventional missiles to specialized anti-drone munitions, and even trained birds of prey—a method employed by several European militaries despite its operational limitations.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has pursued C-UAS capabilities for critical infrastructure protection, with Customs and Border Protection awarding Echodyne a $20 million indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract in November 2021. This five-year agreement reflects growing governmental concern about drone threats to borders, ports, and sensitive facilities, where kinetic defeat options may be restricted by legal and safety considerations.

International Development and Market Dynamics

The Echodyne-WITPiS collaboration occurs within a rapidly expanding global C-UAS market. According to Markets and Markets research, the counter-drone market was valued at $1.4 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach $5.9 billion by 2028, driven by increasing drone proliferation and high-profile security incidents.

Poland's involvement is particularly strategic. As a NATO member sharing borders with both Ukraine and Russian ally Belarus, Poland has substantially increased defense spending, committing to 4% of GDP—nearly double NATO's 2% guideline. The country is pursuing comprehensive military modernization, including a $20 billion program to acquire Abrams tanks, HIMARS rocket systems, and F-35 fighter aircraft from the United States, alongside domestic development programs.

European defense integration has accelerated since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The European Union's €500 million European Defence Industrial Development Programme explicitly encourages collaborative projects like the Echodyne-WITPiS effort, particularly those enhancing interoperability among member states. Poland has positioned itself as a central player in this emerging defense architecture, both as a significant market and as a gateway to broader European adoption.

Competitors in the mobile C-UAS radar space include Israel's Rafael Advanced Defense Systems with its Drone Dome system, Rheinmetall of Germany with the Skyguard/Oerlikon integration, and numerous smaller defense technology firms. The sector has attracted substantial venture capital investment, with Echodyne itself backed by Microsoft founder Bill Gates, venture firms NEA and Madrona Venture Group, and strategic investors including Northrop Grumman.

Technical Performance and Validation

Echodyne's MESA radar systems have undergone extensive field testing across military and civilian applications. According to company specifications, their EchoGuard radar—likely the variant being integrated with WITPiS UGVs—provides detection ranges exceeding 10 kilometers for Group 1 UAS (small drones under 20 pounds) and can simultaneously track over 500 targets. The system operates in the Ku-band frequency range, offering high resolution while maintaining reasonable antenna sizes for mobile applications.

Independent validation of metamaterial radar performance has been documented in peer-reviewed literature. Research published in Nature Communications by a team from the University of California, San Diego demonstrated that metamaterial antenna arrays could achieve beam steering performance comparable to conventional phased arrays at a fraction of the cost and complexity. However, the same research noted challenges in achieving extremely wide bandwidth operation—a potential limitation when facing adversaries employing frequency-agile drone systems.

The U.S. Department of Defense has conducted extensive testing of commercial C-UAS systems through the Joint C-UAS Office (JCO), established in 2019 to coordinate counter-drone efforts across military services. While specific test results remain classified, Echodyne's inclusion in multiple military procurement programs suggests favorable performance evaluations.

Operational Considerations and Limitations

Despite technological advances, mobile C-UAS systems face operational challenges that constrain their effectiveness. The electromagnetic spectrum is increasingly congested, particularly in urban and near-military environments. Radar systems must distinguish between numerous legitimate airspace users—commercial aviation, recreational drones, emergency helicopters—and actual threats. Machine learning algorithms, increasingly incorporated into modern radar processors, help automate this classification, but false alarms remain problematic.

Legal frameworks further complicate C-UAS operations. In most civilian contexts, jamming or kinetically engaging drones raises liability concerns and may violate communications laws. Even military operations must balance C-UAS activities against rules of engagement and collateral damage considerations. A study by the Rand Corporation noted that C-UAS rules of engagement in joint operations environments often prove more limiting than technical capabilities.

Power consumption represents another constraint for vehicle-mounted systems. While Echodyne's metamaterial approach reduces power requirements compared to traditional phased arrays, continuous radar operation still demands substantial electrical power—potentially limiting UGV endurance or requiring larger, heavier vehicles with greater generator capacity.

Environmental factors affect radar performance. Rain, snow, and fog cause signal attenuation, particularly at higher frequencies. Ground clutter from terrain features can mask low-flying targets. These effects are well-understood in radar engineering but require sophisticated signal processing to mitigate, adding computational complexity to embedded systems.

Future Developments and Strategic Implications

The trajectory of C-UAS technology points toward increasing autonomy and integration. Future systems will likely incorporate artificial intelligence for autonomous target recognition, engagement authority decisions, and coordinated responses among networked platforms. The U.S. Army's Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System (IBCS) exemplifies this direction, creating a network architecture where sensors from multiple platforms contribute to a common operating picture, with engagement decisions optimized across the entire system rather than platform-by-platform.

Swarm attacks—simultaneous assaults by dozens or hundreds of coordinated drones—represent an evolving threat that current C-UAS systems struggle to counter. Research sponsored by DARPA's Offensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET) program has demonstrated swarms of 250+ drones operating collaboratively, overwhelming defenses designed for individual threats. Effective counter-swarm capabilities will require dramatic improvements in simultaneous tracking capacity, automated engagement decision-making, and the ability to distinguish patterns within chaotic multi-target environments.

The regulatory landscape continues evolving. The Federal Aviation Administration's Remote ID rule, implemented in 2023, requires most drones to broadcast identification and location information—potentially simplifying friendly/threat discrimination. However, adversaries can disable these systems, and significant numbers of older drones lacking such capability remain in circulation.

From a strategic perspective, the democratization of aerial surveillance and strike capabilities through accessible drone technology represents a fundamental shift in military affairs. Throughout history, air power has been the domain of technologically advanced militaries with substantial resources. Consumer drones costing hundreds of dollars now provide capabilities that required millions of dollars of aircraft and training just two decades ago.

This transformation has particular implications for territorial defense—Poland's core security concern. Where previous doctrines assumed air superiority could be established through fighter aircraft and strategic air defense systems, the proliferation of small UAS means that airspace must be contested at tactical levels across enormous geographic areas. Mobile, networked C-UAS systems like those being developed through the Echodyne-WITPiS collaboration represent one approach to this challenge, trading the comprehensive coverage of traditional air defense for greater flexibility and resilience.

Conclusion

The integration of advanced radar systems into unmanned ground vehicles represents more than a technical achievement—it reflects a strategic adaptation to emerging threats that have fundamentally altered the character of modern conflict. As small drones transition from novelties to ubiquitous battlefield tools, militaries worldwide are investing in layered defenses that can operate across the full spectrum from critical infrastructure protection to forward combat operations.

The Echodyne-WITPiS collaboration demonstrates how technological innovation, when combined with operational expertise and strategic vision, can address complex security challenges. Metamaterial radar systems overcome previous limitations in size, weight, and cost that constrained mobile air defense. Autonomous ground vehicles provide mobility and reduce risk to human operators. Together, these technologies enable new defensive postures that adapt to threats rather than merely reacting to them.

Yet technology alone cannot solve the counter-drone challenge. Effective C-UAS capabilities require integration across sensors, command systems, and defeat mechanisms; accommodation of complex legal and policy constraints; and continuous adaptation as adversaries evolve their tactics and technologies. The success of systems like those under development in Poland will ultimately be measured not by technical specifications, but by their ability to protect people and assets in the messy reality of actual operations—where perfect information is unavailable, friendly activities must continue, and adversaries actively work to overcome defensive measures.

As the electromagnetic and physical dimensions of security increasingly converge, the stakes of this technological competition continue to rise. The sensors we deploy today will shape the strategic landscape of coming decades, determining not just which threats we can counter, but how societies balance security with the openness that enables innovation and prosperity. In this context, the work being done in Warsaw and Kirkland, Washington takes on significance far beyond the specific platforms being developed—it represents our collective effort to maintain security in an age when the skies above us are no longer empty, and threats arrive not with warning sirens but with the quiet hum of electric motors.

---

Sources

1. Echodyne Corporation. "Echodyne and Poland's Military Institute of Armored and Automotive Technology Collaborate on Integrating Counter-Drone Radar into Unmanned Ground Vehicles." Press Release, 2024. https://suasnews.com/2024/11/echodyne-and-polands-military-institute-of-armored-and-automotive-technology-collaborate-on-integrating-counter-drone-radar-into-unmanned-ground-vehicles/

2. Bronk, Justin, and Nick Reynolds. "The Russian Air War and Ukrainian Requirements for Air Defence." Royal United Services Institute, November 2023. https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/special-resources/russian-air-war-and-ukrainian-requirements-air-defence

3. Cancian, Mark F., and Adam Saxton. "The Evolution of Drones: New Capabilities and Future Applications." Center for Strategic and International Studies, June 2023. https://www.csis.org/analysis/evolution-drones-new-capabilities-and-future-applications

4. Kundtz, Nathan, and David R. Smith. "Extreme-angle broadband metamaterial lens." Nature Materials 9, no. 2 (2010): 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2610

5. Smith, David R., et al. "Composite medium with simultaneously negative permeability and permittivity." Physical Review Letters 84, no. 18 (2000): 4184-4187. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184

6. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems. "Multi-Sensor Data Fusion for Counter-UAS Applications." Vol. 58, No. 4, August 2022, pp. 3241-3256. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=7

7. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. "Echodyne Awarded $20M IDIQ Contract from the U.S. DHS Customs & Border Protection Agency." November 2, 2021. https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/news/2021/11/02/news-release-dhs-st-awards-counter-uas-contracts

8. Markets and Markets. "Counter-Drone Market - Global Forecast to 2028." Research Report, May 2023. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/counter-drone-market-155323983.html

9. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. "Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014-2024)." Press Release, July 2024. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_217904.htm

10. European Commission. "European Defence Industrial Development Programme." Official Documentation, 2023. https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/eu-defence-industry/european-defence-industrial-development-programme-edidp_en

11. Watts, Stephen, et al. "A Framework for Analyzing Counter-UAS Solutions." RAND Corporation, 2020. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA300-1.html

12. Federal Aviation Administration. "Remote Identification of Unmanned Aircraft." Final Rule, January 2021, Effective September 2023. https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/remote_id

13. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. "Offensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET)." Program Documentation, 2016-2023. https://www.darpa.mil/program/offensive-swarm-enabled-tactics

14. Hunt, John, et al. "Metamaterial aperture antennas for computational imaging." Nature Communications 9, Article 3333 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05797-7

15. U.S. Army. "Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System (IBCS)." Program Executive Office Missiles and Space, 2024. https://asc.army.mil/web/portfolio-item/integrated-air-and-missile-defense-ibcs/

16. Military Institute of Armored and Automotive Technology (WITPiS). Official website and institutional documentation. https://www.witpis.eu/en/

17. Echodyne Corporation. Technical specifications and product documentation. https://www.echodyne.com/

    Echodyne and Poland’s Military Institute of Armored and Automotive Technology Collaborate on Integrating Counter-Drone Radar into Unmanned Ground Vehicles – sUAS News