The Cavity Magnetron Developments Which Enabled the Rapid Deployment of Airborne Radar Systems in World War II | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

The Cavity Magnetron: How a Wartime Innovation Changed the Modern World

BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front): The cavity magnetron, developed by British physicists John Randall and Harry Boot at the University of Birmingham in 1940, revolutionized radar technology during World War II by generating kilowatt-level microwave power in a compact device. This breakthrough enabled advanced airborne radar systems that proved decisive in the Battle of the Atlantic and strategic bombing campaigns, and later transformed civilian life through applications like microwave ovens and industrial heating systems.

SIDEBAR: The Magnetron in Your Kitchen

From Submarine Hunter to Popcorn Maker

If you've ever reheated coffee or defrosted dinner in a microwave oven, you've used technology directly descended from the cavity magnetron that helped win World War II. The same fundamental design that enabled RAF Coastal Command aircraft to detect German U-boats at night now sits inside approximately 93% of UK households and over 90% of American homes.

How It Works

The cavity magnetron in your microwave oven operates at 2.45 GHz—a frequency selected because it efficiently heats water molecules and falls within an unlicensed industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) radio band. A typical 1,100-watt oven generates about 700 watts of microwave power at roughly 65% efficiency.

Inside the compact metal cylinder (usually about 10 centimeters long):

A heated cathode emits electrons
Strong permanent magnets force electrons into circular paths
Resonant cavities in the copper anode generate electromagnetic oscillations
A probe or antenna couples this energy into the oven's cooking chamber
Rotating turntables and mode stirrers distribute the microwave energy

The Magnets: Ceramic vs. Rare Earth

Most consumer microwave magnetrons use ceramic ferrite magnets rather than rare earth materials. Two large spherical ceramic magnets are found within every microwave stove's magnetron, composed of strontium or barium ferrite mixed with iron oxide. These ceramic magnets are the unsung heroes of the design—brittle, uncoated, and easily broken, but perfectly suited for the job.

Why ceramic over more powerful rare earth neodymium magnets? Three reasons:

Temperature tolerance: Ferrite magnets can handle temperatures up to 842°F (450°C), while neodymium magnets begin losing strength around 176°F and can be permanently damaged above 392°F. Magnetrons generate significant heat during operation.
Corrosion resistance: Ceramic magnets need no protective coating and won't rust, while neodymium magnets require nickel or epoxy plating.
Cost: At less than a dollar for both magnets, ceramic ferrites make economic sense for consumer appliances.

Some modern high-end microwaves do use rare earth magnets for higher efficiency, but the overwhelming majority stick with the proven ceramic design that's barely changed since the 1950s.

The Magnetic Field

A microwave magnet has a magnetic strength of about 1000 gauss, or approximately 0.1 Tesla—about 20 times stronger than a refrigerator magnet but 15-30 times weaker than a medical MRI machine.

This specific field strength isn't arbitrary. To produce microwaves of 12.2cm wavelength, the strength of the magnet needs to be precise. The magnetic field must match the electron cyclotron resonance frequency of 2.45 GHz. Using the cyclotron frequency equation f = (eB)/(2πm), where e is electron charge and m is electron mass, we can calculate that 2.45 GHz requires approximately 0.088 Tesla.

The wartime GEC E-1189 magnetron used a 2.75-kg permanent magnet generating 1,000 Oersteds (roughly 1,000 Gauss or 0.1 Tesla). Bell Labs testing confirmed the British device operated in fields of 1,100 Gauss. Your kitchen microwave uses essentially the same magnetic field strength as those 1940 radar systems—the physics hasn't changed.

The magnetic field forces electrons into spiral paths around the cathode rather than traveling directly to the anode. Electrons' frequency of revolution is about 27.992 GHz per Tesla of magnetic field, so the 0.09 Tesla field produces the required 2.45 GHz rotation frequency that, through interaction with the resonant cavities, generates microwave radiation at exactly the right frequency to heat your food.

The Design Lineage

Modern microwave oven magnetrons retain Randall and Boot's core innovations from 1940:

Metal construction (not glass) allows efficient cooling
Resonant cavities machined into the anode structure control frequency
Strapping (introduced by James Sayers in 1941) stabilizes the operating mode
Permanent magnets (replacing early electromagnets) provide the critical 0.09-0.1 Tesla field

The primary differences are scale and cost. Wartime magnetrons cost thousands of pounds to manufacture and required careful hand-assembly. Today's mass-produced units cost manufacturers less than $10, with automated fabrication producing millions annually.

An Accidental Discovery?

Popular legend claims Percy Spencer of Raytheon "discovered" microwave cooking in 1945 when a magnetron melted a chocolate bar in his pocket. While Spencer did file key patents for microwave cooking applications, researchers had observed the heating effect of radio frequency energy since the 1930s. What changed was the availability of affordable, reliable, mass-produced cavity magnetrons after the war—technology that exists only because of intensive wartime radar development.

The $12 Billion Legacy

The global microwave oven market now exceeds $12 billion annually. Americans purchase over 10 million units each year. The cooking method has become so ubiquitous that "microwaveable" appears as a selling point on countless food products, and entire categories of convenience foods exist only because of widespread microwave ownership.

Beyond consumer ovens, industrial cavity magnetrons power commercial food processing, materials drying, plasma generation, and medical applications. This represents perhaps the most successful dual-use technology transfer in history—from highly classified military equipment to indispensable consumer appliance in less than three decades.

The Recycling Opportunity

When your microwave finally dies, those ceramic magnets are worth saving. A couple of very nice donut shaped magnets about 2 to 3 inches in diameter can be extracted from the magnetron. Hobbyists prize them for projects, using them to magnetize screwdrivers, hold tarps over equipment, or mount tools on steel surfaces. They're not as powerful as neodymium magnets, but they're strong enough to pinch a finger if you're careless.

The microwave also contains valuable copper—about 1-2 kg in the transformer, plus copper wire in the magnetron core, motor coils, and wiring. There's also steel casing, aluminum in the capacitor, and trace amounts of silver and gold in circuit boards and switches. Microwave ovens are full of recyclable materials like steel, copper wiring, circuit boards, and even glass.

Critical safety warning: Never attempt to disassemble a microwave yourself. Microwaves contain high-voltage capacitors that can hold a dangerous charge even after unplugging—potentially lethal for weeks or months. Some older magnetrons contain beryllium oxide ceramic insulators that, if crushed and inhaled, can cause incurable berylliosis. Leave disassembly to licensed e-waste recyclers.

So the next time you heat your morning coffee, remember: you're using the same technology that helped locate enemy submarines in the dark Atlantic nights of 1942, operating with the same 0.1 Tesla magnetic field strength as those wartime radar systems, directly descended from a device developed in a British university laboratory as the Battle of Britain raged overhead.

The Birth of a Game-Changing Technology

In February 1940, just six months after beginning their work, physicists John Randall and Harry Boot achieved what many considered impossible: their laboratory prototype cavity magnetron delivered 400 watts of continuous wave power at a 10-centimeter wavelength. This represented a quantum leap beyond existing technology—previous magnetron designs could barely produce 10 watts at such frequencies.

The innovation centered on a deceptively simple but profound design change. Rather than enclosing the vacuum tube in glass, as virtually all previous magnetron designs had done, Randall and Boot fabricated their device from a solid block of copper with cylindrical resonant cavities machined into it. This metal construction provided far superior heat dissipation, enabling the higher power outputs essential for effective radar operation.

"The cavity magnetron was a massive technological breakthrough and is considered to be one of the most important inventions that came out of the Second World War," notes the historical research compiled by IEEE in their recognition of this achievement with an official IEEE Milestone plaque at the University of Birmingham in 2024.

From Academic Concept to Military Necessity

The path to the cavity magnetron began in 1939 when Marcus Oliphant, head of the physics department at the University of Birmingham, was approached by the Admiralty about developing a radio source operating at microwave frequencies. Oliphant assigned the task to Randall, who had joined Birmingham in 1937 after working at General Electric Company (GEC) Wembley on luminescence research, and Harry Boot, forming a partnership that would prove historically significant.

The timing was critical. Britain's existing radar systems, including the Chain Home network that had begun operations in 1938, operated at relatively low frequencies (20-50 MHz) and required massive antenna arrays. The Air-to-Surface Vessel (ASV) radars entering service in 1939 operated around 200 MHz with bulky Yagi antenna systems. Operating at higher microwave frequencies would permit dramatically smaller antennas—essential for airborne applications—but no one had yet developed a source capable of generating sufficient power at these frequencies.

While Randall and Boot's design represented a breakthrough in practical implementation, the historical record reveals a more complex story of parallel development. Japanese researcher Kinjiro Okabe had designed an eight-cavity magnetron operating at 10-centimeter wavelength in 1939, with dimensions remarkably similar to the British prototype. Russian physicist N.F. Alekseev had developed a four-segment cavity magnetron producing 300 watts at 9 centimeters, though this work remained largely unknown outside the Soviet Union until published in 1944. In France, Henri Gutton's M-16 magnetron had been used for collision avoidance radar aboard the liner Normandie in 1937, though it retained a glass envelope design that limited its power output.

Engineering for Mass Production

The laboratory success in February 1940 immediately triggered an intensive engineering effort. In April 1940, the Admiralty contracted with GEC Research Laboratories in Wembley to transform Birmingham's academic prototype into a fully engineered operational device suitable for mass production.

Eric Megaw, Britain's leading magnetron expert who had published extensively on magnetron generation mechanisms since the 1930s, led the GEC engineering team. The first GEC cavity magnetron, designated E-1188, achieved 500 watts continuous wave output by May 16, 1940, when paired with a 23-kilogram permanent magnet. The subsequent E-1189 design, optimized for airborne applications with improved cooling and a compact sealed construction, achieved 3 kilowatts peak power by June 29, 1940, and would eventually reach 25 kilowatts—meeting the stringent requirements of radar manufacturers.

A crucial advancement came from James Sayers at Birmingham, who recognized that frequency instability stemmed from the magnetron oscillating in multiple modes. In July 1941, Sayers introduced "strapping"—electrical connections between selected resonator cavities that constrained oscillation to specific modes, dramatically improving both power output and frequency stability. This innovation proved essential for reliable operational deployment.

"Those who were in the business know how much the practical development of the cavity magnetron—the development that made it something that could go into operational use—was due to Megaw," wrote Nobel Laureate Sir Edward Appleton in a 1956 letter, acknowledging contributions that patents and official awards had somewhat obscured.

The Tizard Mission: Technology Transfer That Changed the War

By summer 1940, Britain faced an existential crisis. France had fallen, the Battle of Britain raged in the skies, and the nation lacked the industrial capacity to mass-produce cavity magnetrons at the scale warfare demanded. Prime Minister Winston Churchill made the fateful decision to share Britain's most sensitive military technology with the United States, which had yet to enter the war.

In September 1940, the Tizard Mission—led by Sir Henry Tizard, chairman of the Aeronautical Research Committee—traveled to the United States carrying what historian James Phinney Baxter III would later call "the most valuable cargo ever brought to our shores." Among the technologies shared were the proximity fuse, details of Frank Whittle's jet engine, the Frisch-Peierls memorandum outlining a practical atomic bomb design, and a GEC E-1189 cavity magnetron (one of only twelve then in existence).

The demonstration at the National Defense Research Committee meeting proved electrifying. As U.S. Navy representatives detailed their struggles with klystrons producing merely 10 watts in continuous wave operation, Edward "Taffy" Bowen, a Welsh physicist and radar pioneer, produced the cavity magnetron from his briefcase. "The atmosphere was electric," Bowen recalled years later. "The U.S. experts found it hard to believe that such a small device could produce so much power, and that what lay on the table in front of us might prove to be the salvation of the Allied cause."

Testing at Bell Laboratories confirmed the magnetron could generate 15-kilowatt pulses in a 1,100-gauss magnetic field—ten times the output power at five times the frequency of the best American devices. The technology transfer proved remarkably rapid and comprehensive, with Bell Labs, Western Electric, Raytheon, and Canadian firm Research Enterprises Ltd. all receiving complete design details.

Operational Deployment and Strategic Impact

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Radiation Laboratory, established in October 1940 and ultimately second in size only to the Manhattan Project, coordinated American microwave radar development. By February 1941—just four months after the Tizard Mission—a Radiation Laboratory radar detected an aircraft at 3-kilometer range from an MIT building rooftop. Flight trials in a Douglas B-18 bomber followed in March, with Bowen aboard to witness detection of ships at 16 kilometers and a submarine at 6.5 kilometers off New London, Connecticut.

British development proceeded in parallel. The first operational cavity magnetron radar was the Admiralty's Type 271 naval gun-laying system, operational in 32 flower-class corvettes by September 1941—at a critical juncture in the Battle of the Atlantic. With antennas mounted atop 10-meter masts, corvettes could track surfaced submarines at 3,500-meter range. By May 1942, these radars could detect targets as small as a U-boat conning tower.

For airborne applications, the AI Mark VII radar entered service in March 1942 as the first operational airborne interception system using the cavity magnetron. The H2S ground-mapping radar, operating at S-band (around 3 GHz), entered service in 1943 as a bombing aid, providing clear discrimination between land, sea, and built-up areas even through cloud cover and at night. The later H2S Mark III operated at X-band with even higher resolution. American development produced the equivalent H2X (AN/APS-15) radar, with the first production units reaching England in January 1944.

The most critical application was anti-submarine warfare. Prior to cavity magnetron radars, Allied aircraft had sunk fewer than 40 U-boats. The ASV Mark III radar (essentially H2S Mark II operating at S-band) deployed in June 1942 could detect surfaced submarines at 24-32 kilometer range compared to only 13 kilometers for earlier VHF systems. German U-boats' Metox radar warning receivers could not detect these centimetric frequencies. By war's end, Allied aircraft using cavity magnetron radars had sunk nearly 200 U-boats—a fivefold increase directly attributable to the new technology, though improved weapons, aircraft, and cryptanalysis also contributed significantly.

The Enemy's Struggle to Catch Up

Germany and Japan, despite having conducted early magnetron research, never closed the technological gap. German scientists had favored klystron development, severely limiting available transmitter power. Following Reichsmarshal Hermann Göring's February 1940 "development stop order," German engineers were directed to focus on longer wavelengths rather than centimetric systems.

The capture of a British H2S-equipped Stirling bomber near Rotterdam in February 1943 provided German engineers at Telefunken with a complete CV64 cavity magnetron to copy. They produced the "Nachbau" (replica) or LMS10 device, but encountered significant manufacturing difficulties, particularly with materials for suitable magnets. Though approximately 100 German cavity magnetron radar systems became operational, deployment came too late to affect the war's outcome.

Allied superiority in cavity magnetron technology was so critical that aircraft equipped with these radars were forbidden from flying over Germany until 1943. The devices were fitted with explosives to destroy them if the aircraft was shot down, preventing the technology from falling into enemy hands prematurely.

Recognition and Legacy

The Royal Commission on Awards to Inventors assessed compensation for civil servants whose inventions profited the Crown. In 1949, Randall, Boot, and Sayers shared a £36,000 prize (equivalent to over £600,000 today)—sufficient for each inventor to purchase several houses. They subsequently received the 1943 Thomas Gray Memorial Prize from the Royal Society of Arts for "improving the safety of life at sea," the 1958 John Price Wetherill Medal from the Franklin Institute, and the 1959 John Scott Medal from Philadelphia. Randall was knighted in 1962, becoming Sir John Randall.

Eric Megaw's contributions received less formal recognition, though he was appointed Member of the Order of the British Empire (MBE) in 1943 and received the Duddell Premium Award from the Institution of Electrical Engineers. It remains unclear why Megaw was not named as a co-inventor in the primary patents, though GEC's patent department had closed during wartime.

The cavity magnetron's civilian applications ultimately exceeded its military significance. By 1945, some 250,000 magnetrons had been delivered for British deployment alone. The global microwave oven market now exceeds $12 billion annually, with over 10 million units sold yearly in the United States alone and 93% of UK households owning one. Modern low-cost cavity magnetrons (typically generating 700 watts at 65% efficiency in 1.1-kilowatt ovens) derive directly from the Birmingham and GEC wartime innovations. Industrial microwave heating and drying systems for food, liquid, and material processing represent another major application.

In June 2024, IEEE installed a Milestone plaque at the University of Birmingham's Poynting Building, where the original research occurred. The plaque reads: "In this building from 1939 to 1941, University of Birmingham researchers John Randall, Harry Boot, and James Sayers conceived and demonstrated fundamental ways to improve the output power, efficiency, and frequency stability of cavity magnetrons. Further developed and refined by others, these advances facilitated the Allies' deployment of microwave radar systems in World War II. Cavity magnetrons were later adapted for use in industrial heating and microwave ovens."

Technical Significance and Continuing Relevance

The cavity magnetron represented not merely an incremental improvement but a fundamental breakthrough in microwave power generation. The key innovations—resonant cavity construction in metal rather than glass, efficient coupling mechanisms, and mode stabilization through strapping—established principles that remain relevant in modern microwave engineering.

By the 1970s, radar systems began exploiting developments in traveling wave tube technology to enable coherent waveforms, pulse compression, and digital signal processing, eventually superseding magnetrons in many military applications. However, cavity magnetrons remain in widespread service for marine radar systems and continue to dominate applications where high power, simplicity, and low cost are paramount considerations.

The cavity magnetron story illustrates how fundamental research, engineering refinement, international collaboration, and strategic decision-making can converge to produce transformative technology. From Randall and Boot's initial laboratory demonstration to Megaw's engineering for manufacture, from the Tizard Mission's unprecedented technology transfer to deployment in hundreds of thousands of radar systems and ultimately billions of consumer appliances, the cavity magnetron's impact on both warfare and peacetime society ranks among the most significant technological developments of the twentieth century.

Verified Sources and Citations

Boot, H. A. H., & Randall, J. T. (1976). Historical notes on the cavity magnetron. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 23(7), 724-729. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-ED.1976.18476
Brown, L. (1999). A Radar History of World War II: Technical and Military Imperative. CRC Press.
Watts, S. (2018). Airborne Maritime Surveillance Radar: British ASV Radars in WWII 1939–1945 (Vol. 1). Morgan & Claypool.
Blanchard, Y., Galati, G., & van Genderen, P. (2013). The cavity magnetron: Not just a British invention. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 55(5), 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2013.6735528
Lovell, B. (2004). The cavity magnetron in World War II: Was the secrecy justified? Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 58(3), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2004.0058
Megaw, E. C. S. (1946). The high-power pulsed magnetron: A review of early developments. Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part IIIA: Radiolocation, 93(5), 977-984. https://doi.org/10.1049/ji-3a-1.1946.0187
Boot, H. A. H., & Randall, J. T. (1946). The cavity magnetron. Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part IIIA: Radiolocation, 93(5), 928-938. https://doi.org/10.1049/ji-3a-1.1946.0183
Clausing, H., & Judkins, P. (2023). Microwave generation into a key military technology in World War 2: A comparative study. Transmission Lines, Defense Electronics History Society, 28(4), 1-32.
IEEE History Center. (2024). IEEE Milestone: Development of the Cavity Magnetron, 1939-1941. University of Birmingham. https://ethw.org/Milestones:Development_of_the_Cavity_Magnetron,_1939-1941
Randall, J. T., Boot, H. A. H., & Wright, C. S. (1940). Magnetron: Improvements in high frequency electrical oscillators. UK Patent GB 588185 A. https://patents.google.com/patent/GB588185A/
Sayers, J., & Wright, C. S. (1947). Improvements in high frequency electrical oscillators. UK Patent GB 588916 A. https://patents.google.com/patent/GB588916A/
Bowen, E. G. (1987). Radar Days. Adam Hilger.
Conant, J. (2002). Tuxedo Park. Simon and Schuster.
Fine, N. (2019). Blind Bombing: How Microwave Radar Brought the Allies to D-Day and Victory in World War II. Potomac Books.
Wilkes, M. (1987). John Turton Randall. Royal Society Biographical Memoirs, 33, 493-535. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbm.1987.0018
Nakajima, S. (1992). Japanese radar development prior to 1945. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 34(6), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.1992.202157
Bauer, A. O. (2010). The German wartime struggle to catch up with allied power magnetron technology. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Origins and Evolution of the Cavity Magnetron. Bournemouth University. http://www.cdvandt.org/CAVMAG-2010-Wartime%20Struggle.pdf
Royal Commission on Awards to Inventors. (1957). Use of Inventions and Designs by Government Departments. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London. https://archive.org/details/op1265894-1001/
Smith, R. A., Hanbury-Brown, R., Mould, A. J., Ward, A. G., & Walker, B. A. (1985). ASV: The detection of surface vessels by airborne radar. IEE Proceedings A - Physical Science, Measurement and Instrumentation, Management and Education, 132(6), 359-384. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-a-1.1985.0071
Hendrie, A. (2010). The Cinderella Service: RAF Coastal Command 1939-1945. Pen and Sword Aviation.
Metaxas, A. C., & Meredith, R. J. (1988). Industrial Microwave Heating. Institution of Engineering and Technology.
Osepchuk, J. M. (1984). A history of microwave heating applications. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 32(9), 1200-1224. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.1984.1132831

Aerospace Electronic and Defense Systems

Sunday, January 11, 2026